- 309
- 67
I wrote above that I have never repeated the mistakes I made.So for how long should the calc blog ban be applied, and what types of calculations should it cover?
@DMUA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wrote above that I have never repeated the mistakes I made.So for how long should the calc blog ban be applied, and what types of calculations should it cover?
@DMUA
One month, speed calculationsSo for how long should the calc blog ban be applied, and what types of calculations should it cover?
@DMUA
I do not understand how public tickets would not be transparent. I'm merely suggesting separating different issues rather than having them all in one giant linear thread.The rejection reason was "the system does not have much transparency" which I don't agree with it but whatever.
Posting your personal information like SN numbers, addresses, etc. is definitely not advised. Doing so for other members against their consent will result in a ban.
Posting your personal information like SN numbers, addresses, etc. is definitely not advised. Doing so for other members against their consent will result in a ban. Moreover, please do not post fake or copypasta pieces of personal information that would otherwise be considered sensitive; this includes, but is not limited to, copypasta IP addresses.
The post is very unnecessary. It does not belong to our community.The only true path is Islam. Sharia will come to Turkey; the secularism bubble has already burst. This is the goal for 2025.
I don't seems to find a crt for these characters , upgrade or seems like user is vandalising profile.
Ok thanks, search function isn't working properly igShould Ben's Aliens scale to Rex Salazar?
Wasn't the reason why Armodrillo scaling was rejected cause it's Environmental destruction and an overtime feat ? nah, it is another feat, and it was never rejected, just no one ever evaluatedvsbattles.com
Can I send AP calculations?One month, speed calculations
I was part of the Versus Thread briefly, this input may or may not impact the report. If not, then feel free to delete.
Whether or not Zeno can erase history/Giorno is completely irrelevant to the VS Thread, since RtZ is preventing Zeno from using it in the first place. And RtZ is capable of affecting Zeno, since he’s only physically 3D.
So RtZ isn’t affecting the attack itself, but the being performing the attack.
If anything, bringing up history erasure is derailing the VS Thread.
Please don't start debating in RVR.
Last Message.Please don't start debating in RVR.
Okay. That seems perfectly fine to me then.One month, speed calculations
I personally do not mind that change.
I am not sure. Isn't that member advocating for political tyranny, which is not the kind of political discussion that is remotely something supported by our community rules?To give a translation to people who are lazy:
The post is very unnecessary. It does not belong to our community.
Seems only a warning and deletion warrants here.
Well, it is just a comparatively unimportant versus thread, and from what I recall, Chariot190 is a member in quite good standing in our community. Is it really necessary to apply any punishments here, or is it better to just lock that thread?I am here to make a report on both @Chariot190 and @Lynieryz because of them keeping to be unreasonable and extremely stubborn on this thread (that is already a dumpster on fire, btw).
Basically, the entire thing is about whenever Giorno can null or not Zeno's effect of him erasing of the timeline. In fact, Zeno does indeed have the ability to erase things across history, as mentioned from SDBH Zamasu's profile:
Immortality & Regeneration [Types 1, 2, 3 & 4. High-Godly; History] (Came back[1] after being erased[2] by Zen'ō along with[3] the entire timeline[4]. Instantly regenerated his body after Jiren completely obliterated him, and stated that he will continuously rehabilitate[5][6] no matter what happens to him, stated by narrator to be an immortal god[7]. Should be similar to his DBS counterpart who stated to be able to reform[2] even from Power of Destruction's erasure. Should be able to replicate his feat of turning into Infinite Zamasu but on a much larger scale)
From this it should be easy to understand that Zeno's erasure is indeed accepted as being capable of erasing things across history, as otherwise Zamasu wouldn't have High Godly, but just Mid Godly. In fact, this isn't even a "SDBH Zeno", it's just the Canon Zamasu regenerating after the events of DBS.
But those people keep to say that Zeno cannot have this, and that Zamasu's regeneration does not matter, thus basically saying that it's wrong and that shouldn't matter on the thread, despite being actually used in the profiles.
In fact, Chariot completely ignored this and stonewalled not one, two but three times.
Lynieryz on the other hand is basically resorting to troll behaviours and trying to look as irritating as they can here, here, here or also here.
This isn't even having a different opinion on how an ability works, but completely ignoring something accepted on the profiles on the sole basis of "it's not on the profile so it does not matter" despite it being nonsensical and ignoring why Zamasu has High Godly to begin with.
Okay, but our rules forbid politically extremely controversial arguments, and he seemed to openly advocate for permanent very ruthless political tyranny.Since it is not supported by our community rules, the post should be deleted and the user should be given a warning. Unless you perceive some serious threats from the post that warrants further extreme punishment, you can offer an alternative punishment.
I think he does not know how online communities even work.
I am the creator of the threadWell, it is just a comparatively unimportant versus thread, and from what I recall, Chariot190 is a member is quite good standing in our community. Is it really necessary to apply any punishments here, or is it better to just lock that thread?
I have now discussed things with Chariot in DMs (and we insulted each other a lot for hours, if I need to be honest).Well, it is just a comparatively unimportant versus thread, and from what I recall, Chariot190 is a member is quite good standing in our community. Is it really necessary to apply any punishments here, or is it better to just lock that thread?
Okay, so should it currently be locked then?I am the creator of the thread
If things are getting too heated then it should be locked
Chariot and Strym stopped fighting a long way back in that thread
Yes. Agreed.I feel like that user is only here to cause trouble.
Okay. I will lock that thread then.I have now discussed things with Chariot in DMs (and we insulted each other a lot for hours, if I need to be honest).
We did calm down, the match was agreed to be a major mismatch from the majority regardless.
Currently we are debating if the match is a stomp or not so it shouldn’t be locked yet imoOkay, so should it currently be locked then?
I can't speak of which ideology he is trying to spread, since it is not mainly my focus here. The post itself is not welcome here, since we forbid any political controversial arguments in general, since it simply brings drama and brings a good precedence and fairness to all types of communities (either allow, or disallow all).Okay, but our rules forbid politically extremely controversial arguments, and he seemed to openly advocate for permanent very ruthless political tyranny.
Do we really want such members in our community? Especially given that he has just made a very limited number of posts so far, has also not helped out here, and we are striving to be an internationally kind, compassionate, and tolerant community for all ethnicities, genders, sexualities, cultures, and so onwards, which he seems strongly ideologically opposed to.
I'd like to also bring our attention to this conversation (between the mentioned user and the users @zaraus and @Mamaroza)I am not sure. Isn't that member advocating for political tyranny, which is not the kind of political discussion that is remotely something supported by our community rules?
I would have destroyed your God, but I wouldn't even try now.
Son of a bitch, why do you ask God?
Don't curse God, you scumbag
Okay. I will do so then.Fine by me. You can permanently ban him.
Can somebody please investigate regarding which member that said what rule-violating things please?I'd like to also bring our attention to this conversation (between the mentioned user and the users @zaraus and @Mamaroza)
In this conversation, they, at least according to google translate, say things like:
While its probably not an exact translation, you get the idea. This sorta stuff has nothing to do with our wiki.
I have handled it.Okay. I will do so then.
I personally believe such people should not be allowed on this site, or any other site. People have a right to free speech, but they are not allowed to use said speech to incite hate and tyranny. This is why free speech is a double-edged sword.Okay, but our rules forbid politically extremely controversial arguments, and he seemed to openly advocate for permanent very ruthless political tyranny.
Do we really want such members in our community? Especially given that he has just made a very limited number of posts so far, has also not helped out here, and we are striving to be an internationally kind, compassionate, and tolerant community for all ethnicities, genders, sexualities, cultures, and so onwards, which he seems strongly ideologically opposed to.
Yes. Agreed.I personally believe such people should not be allowed on this site, or any other site. People have a right to free speech, but they are not allowed to use said speech to incite hate and tyranny. This is why free speech is a double-edged sword.