• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Sir_Ovens said:
Have you tried not doing that?

Like just staying on topic and simply not responding when nothing more needs to be said?
Click to expand...
I'm not the one who goes off topic, someone always brings up something else

the only time I went off topic was in the remove calcs in TR thread, but that one wasn't even that bad to the point where I get topic banned
 
So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
 
Deagonx said:
At the time, the controversy was primarily that it had been applied with a small consensus (2 agrees, 3 neutrals) with Derek's disagree.

The focal point was Fuji applying it, everyone was clear that she hadn't pulled the wool over anyone's eyes in doing so, the matter of whether it was a sufficient vote was sort of secondary to that and everything got out of hand fairly fast.

I don't necessarily think it should've been reverted, but at the end of the day we can make another CRT to focus on those two issues and attempt to come to a more decisive agreement on what to do.

In any case, it is best that the RVR not become a proxy war for MG issues.
Click to expand...
Well, maybe @Dereck03 is willing to create a staff forum thread regarding the topic?
 
Antvasima said:
Well, maybe @Dereck03 is willing to create a staff forum thread regarding the topic?
Click to expand...
I think I said previously that I don't know what thread I would have to create to address this whole issue and I clarified that I am not the best at all at creating these types of topics or getting involved in the drama.

And according to all this problem again, there was an exhaustive investigation since the problem in RVT a few weeks ago that involved me, deagon and others where the conclusions reached by Bambu, Medeus and Ant after all the time of investigation of the problem is that those specific changes were reversed and other conclusions that I will not say here for the sake of privacy.
 
Antvasima said:
So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
Click to expand...
I agree with this, aye, from my limited scope of knowledge on the sitch.
 
Antvasima said:
So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
Click to expand...
That's fine by me but the specifc problem with isn't just with Vapourrrrr in general because the entirely of the TR verse is plaged with bad calcs, blogs, and profiles that have in several occasions just had stuff added to them without crts or mod approval be in calcs or abilities and even then it hasn't just been a one or two time thing for this verse.

It needs some major overhaul and a drastic change in the way its supporters handle the verse and its quality on the wiki because as it stands i don't know a single CGM or thread mod who really wants to interact with the verse in any major capacity due to these continously issues and back and forth, that's just my two cents though
 
Yes, I have also noticed that a few of the supporters keep pestering our calc group members extensively if they do not get the results that they want. Not aggressively, but relentlessly persistently.
 
Reporting @yuko

His account is about a year old, but he only has 4 posts so one of them came up in the mod queue. He was attempting to post on Ultima's Marvel Revision so I rejected it because he doesn't have staff permission, so I posted on his wall letting him know the rules, and this exchange followed.

Me: Please be informed that you are not allowed to comment on staff discussion threads without permission from a moderator.
Yuko: Oh gee im so sorry for doing that im so butt hurt can you ever forgive me????
Me: Weird.
Yuko: Hop off my tip

Not sure what the best course of action is, but given his whopping 4 total posts and juvenile attitude, I wouldn't be opposed to just blocking him, but open to other suggestions.
 
Last edited:
Also, we seemed to be on our way to a topic ban from Tokyo Revengers for Vapourrrr. Do we intend to move forward with that? All of the staff that commented seemed to be in favor of it, but we didn't nail down a specific time frame.
 
A 2 month timeframe was proposed by Antvasima with Mr. Bambu agreeing with it.
Antvasima said:
So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
Click to expand...
Mr._Bambu said:
I agree with this, aye, from my limited scope of knowledge on the sitch.
Click to expand...
I personally think it should be 1 month longer, though.
 
Deagonx said:
Reporting @yuko

His account is about a year old, but he only has 4 posts so one of them came up in the mod queue. He was attempting to post on Ultima's Marvel Revision so I rejected it because he doesn't have staff permission, so I posted on his wall letting him know the rules, and this exchange followed.

Me: Please be informed that you are not allowed to comment on staff discussion threads without permission from a moderator.
Yuko: Oh gee im so sorry for doing that im so butt hurt can you ever forgive me????
Me: Weird.
Yuko: Hop off my tip

Not sure what the best course of action is, but given his whopping 4 total posts and juvenile attitude, I wouldn't be opposed to just blocking him, but open to other suggestions.
Click to expand...
Yeah I'd vote just a block. Perma is fine with me.

Also, we seemed to be on our way to a topic ban from Tokyo Revengers for Vapourrrr. Do we intend to move forward with that? All of the staff that commented seemed to be in favor of it, but we didn't nail down a specific time frame.
Click to expand...
Still in favor, two months still seems fine in my book, and then we can tackle the situation from there if it continues.

EDIT: Migue sniped me, bastard.
 
Anyway, it seems like Vapourrrrr is going to receive a 2 months topic ban from Tokyo Revengers threads. What should we say in our connected instruction message to him?

Also, should his recent edits mentioned above be reverted or not?
 
If you have questions you may ask him directly, on his wall. Respectfully, it is against the rules of the thread to comment as an unrelated third-party- we have to keep discussion trimmed to a minimum so it is as easy as possible to follow the conversation.

Do not continue posting to this thread.
 
I don't think that's necessary. Just that warning's fine, imo.

EDIT:
Mr._Bambu said:
Yeah I'd vote just a block. Perma is fine with me.
Click to expand...
I really don't like perma-blocking new members for a level of hostility that would get a user with even a few hundred posts a warning. If you have to block, I'd drop it to at the very least a year, but more realistically a month or a week.
 
Last edited:
Agnaa said:
I really don't like perma-blocking new members for a level of hostility that would get a user with even a few hundred posts a warning. If you have to block, I'd drop it to at the very least a year, but more realistically a month or a week.
Click to expand...
Well, he's not a new member. He's had an account for a year, with posts from a year ago and 9 months ago. It seems he's an individual with extremely low interest in our community, and clearly no particular regard for the rules or basic courtesy. So personally I think the permanent block should remain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FinePoint
  • Locked
Discussion Rule Word Salad
Replies
22
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
17
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FlipLaScript
Loosening Up Tier 1 Rules
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
Kanogami
Kanogami
Back
Top