- 16,174
- 9,416
Have you tried not doing that?My problematic behaviour is "stone walling"...
Like just staying on topic and simply not responding when nothing more needs to be said?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you tried not doing that?My problematic behaviour is "stone walling"...
I'm not the one who goes off topic, someone always brings up something elseHave you tried not doing that?
Like just staying on topic and simply not responding when nothing more needs to be said?
Well, maybe @Dereck03 is willing to create a staff forum thread regarding the topic?At the time, the controversy was primarily that it had been applied with a small consensus (2 agrees, 3 neutrals) with Derek's disagree.
The focal point was Fuji applying it, everyone was clear that she hadn't pulled the wool over anyone's eyes in doing so, the matter of whether it was a sufficient vote was sort of secondary to that and everything got out of hand fairly fast.
I don't necessarily think it should've been reverted, but at the end of the day we can make another CRT to focus on those two issues and attempt to come to a more decisive agreement on what to do.
In any case, it is best that the RVR not become a proxy war for MG issues.
I think I said previously that I don't know what thread I would have to create to address this whole issue and I clarified that I am not the best at all at creating these types of topics or getting involved in the drama.Well, maybe @Dereck03 is willing to create a staff forum thread regarding the topic?
I was thinking slightly more longer than that, but I guess 2 months is fineSo would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
I agree with this, aye, from my limited scope of knowledge on the sitch.So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
That's fine by me but the specifc problem with isn't just with Vapourrrrr in general because the entirely of the TR verse is plaged with bad calcs, blogs, and profiles that have in several occasions just had stuff added to them without crts or mod approval be in calcs or abilities and even then it hasn't just been a one or two time thing for this verse.So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
I can create a staff thread later today since Dereck seems unwilling.Well, maybe @Dereck03 is willing to create a staff forum thread regarding the topic?
No one gets banned for simple "Debating" it is more so "Acting like a crazed egomaniac on debates" that warrants a topic ban.Banning me for debating is crazy
So would a two months Tokyo Revengers topic ban be sufficient for Vapourrrrr? It should hopefully be enough time for him to work on his behaviour, as he doesn't seem to be ill-intended.
I personally think it should be 1 month longer, though.I agree with this, aye, from my limited scope of knowledge on the sitch.
Yeah I'd vote just a block. Perma is fine with me.Reporting @yuko
His account is about a year old, but he only has 4 posts so one of them came up in the mod queue. He was attempting to post on Ultima's Marvel Revision so I rejected it because he doesn't have staff permission, so I posted on his wall letting him know the rules, and this exchange followed.
Me: Please be informed that you are not allowed to comment on staff discussion threads without permission from a moderator.
Yuko: Oh gee im so sorry for doing that im so butt hurt can you ever forgive me????
Me: Weird.
Yuko: Hop off my tip
Not sure what the best course of action is, but given his whopping 4 total posts and juvenile attitude, I wouldn't be opposed to just blocking him, but open to other suggestions.
Still in favor, two months still seems fine in my book, and then we can tackle the situation from there if it continues.Also, we seemed to be on our way to a topic ban from Tokyo Revengers for Vapourrrr. Do we intend to move forward with that? All of the staff that commented seemed to be in favor of it, but we didn't nail down a specific time frame.
I am reporting @Migue79 for sniping Bambu in the RVR. I propose a 20 year ban.EDIT: Migue sniped me, bastard.
@Crabwhale please add us to the list.Please no derailing. Thread block yourselves indefinitely.
Not quite- there's a Downgrade that's bringing Lookism folk from Small Building level+ to Small Building level, I think he thought it already passed since everyone was in agreement until @RemainsAE joined the discussion, and was just applying the changes. Just an honest mistake.this guy https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Vapourrrrr
vandalizer
I've done so.Can an admin please condense this down and delete the unnecessary comments when ya have time.
Please stop derailing with such pointless comments. Thank you.A downgrade? wait I thought its a calc or something?
I really don't like perma-blocking new members for a level of hostility that would get a user with even a few hundred posts a warning. If you have to block, I'd drop it to at the very least a year, but more realistically a month or a week.Yeah I'd vote just a block. Perma is fine with me.