- 8,243
- 1,382
oh, he writes those every other week
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 6,104
- 5,102
I'll handle it.
- 8,243
- 1,382
???
- 8,243
- 1,382
i wasn't trying to have a casual discussion, i was trying to say that pan's "farewell message" probably isn't legit
- 4,942
- 1,316
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 7,678
- 4,265
I mean, the dude is just asking a question. I don't really see any report-worthy behaviors there.
- 19,325
- 9,911
... what about that post is report worthy?
- 11,255
- 17,490
It seems like an honest question. Nothing about it seems report-worthy.
- 10,036
- 14,718
Are they really the same person or is it some minuscule coincidence they have the same name?
- 19,325
- 9,911
If he is the same dude then neat, kind of derailing a bit here, but point is him making a Q&A thread on dimensional tiering isn't really report worthy at all. If that's seriously report worthy, then A LOT of people on the wiki would've been reported just because they asked how certain things work.
- 966
- 183
I'm almost 100% positive
- 4,265
- 2,795
It's his personal youtube channel (or so is thought)
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 7,678
- 4,265
Its his youtube channel it seems, and he talks about scaling and stuff.
Pretty neat if it was actually the same person. Would love to have youtubers here.
- 4,942
- 1,316
I remember some of his comments on the internal wiki, hopefully he will be a lot less rude as he was back there
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 7,678
- 4,265
Anyways, we should probably stop derailing. The dude doesn't seem toxic in any way.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 29,965
- 31,080
Yeah, the person seems fairly harmless unless and he's just asking a question. Unless someone can actually show things actually harmful, we can't do anything.
Anyway, we should probably remove some derailing comments.
Anyway, we should probably remove some derailing comments.
- 15,277
- 15,439
This guy vandalized the Naruto verse page.
- 29,965
- 31,080
Banned; those were obvious troll edits.
- 12,438
- 4,562
- 12,438
- 4,562
Seems like a spite/troll post, as the OP already said that Battler stomps the opponent.
- 11,255
- 17,490
My understanding is that he made that thread and then immediately after said that one of the characters stomps. Makes it seem like he made the thread knowing they'd stomp.
- 6,967
- 4,211
I'd prefer we leave the thread open for an Umineko knowledgeable to give their information on, as I believe that the person is using misinformation and taking scans out of context to argue a character is stronger then the profile states they are so as to create the stomp.
I suspect they are either a troll exaggerating well-know character's abilities, or a particularly biased fan who would twist information to make them seem stronger. However, as I'm not that familiar with the series I'd like a knowledgeable take on the scan first to see if what I suspect is correct.
Edit: Based on their post history for the couple of weeks that have been on the site, they either severally misunderstand the site's systems, will use even the most flimsy evidence to make their favourite characters stronger, or are just a troll.
Creating threads such as Saitama vs CAS, and arguing Saitama wins, Trying to make Arceus Low 1-C with remarkably weak evidence, and Arguing Goku's hyperversal with somehow even weaker evidence.
I suspect they are either a troll exaggerating well-know character's abilities, or a particularly biased fan who would twist information to make them seem stronger. However, as I'm not that familiar with the series I'd like a knowledgeable take on the scan first to see if what I suspect is correct.
Edit: Based on their post history for the couple of weeks that have been on the site, they either severally misunderstand the site's systems, will use even the most flimsy evidence to make their favourite characters stronger, or are just a troll.
Creating threads such as Saitama vs CAS, and arguing Saitama wins, Trying to make Arceus Low 1-C with remarkably weak evidence, and Arguing Goku's hyperversal with somehow even weaker evidence.
Last edited:
- 6,967
- 4,211
It does seem like he took the scan out of context, but like all the threads it could be a case of a new user just wrongly interpreting things in a way that makes a character stronger then they are. So I won't say they have any malicious intent but I do believe at least a warning is necessary because of how they have frequently made such errors.
- 1,808
- 2,809
Luffysolosfictionstfubozo's change on Naruto's profile.
- 29,965
- 31,080
Same edits as other permabanned users and similar username to them. Possible sock, so I banned him in addition to vandalism.
- 9,998
- 5,218
I find the fact that all of the Naruto Uzumaki profiles were unlocked as an alarming prospect, so I locked all of them for the time being.
If anyone wants the profiles unlocked, they need only say so. I feel it's better safe than sorry.
If anyone wants the profiles unlocked, they need only say so. I feel it's better safe than sorry.
Similar threads
