• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Sigurd has a point here, if not at the very least ban Matt from threads where his behavior has constantly been like that.
 
I don’t see how this doesn’t lead to a ban if he’s been doing that for years.
Well, the community used to be extremely dependent on him to improve the quality of our profile pages, so we were more lenient towards him than any other member, but I am getting tired of acting as a shield for him year in and year out, while he doesn't significantly shape up, and keeps being ungrateful by repeatedly whacking me in the head as thank you for the effort.

Even so, I do think that his analytical sensibilities are very beneficial for this community when he makes an effort to help out and behave properly in combination, so I would prefer either a very strict warning or at most a brief ban to start with. Just so he understand that we are very tired of giving him special treatment at this point.

Btw: I sent the thread links to AKM in private, as he requested.
 
A brief ban sounds acceptable to me - and can be escalated after that point if he doesn't shape up afterwards.
 
Well, maybe we could start with giving him a few months restriction from the verses where he has been a recurrent problem, similarly to what we did with Firephoenixearl. However, it is better if our Human Resources group handles this discussion in private.
 
I don't see how I'm showing poor behavior here. I merely disagree with Ant's accessement and it's just a case of him trying to make an unrelated issue about himself. Because Ant doesn't like that I openly disagree with him in threads.
 
Or, perhaps, the greater problem is you being little more than a nuisance in just about any thread you're in and flinging shit at whoever is unfortunate enough to disagree with you. But nah, couldn't be that.
I believe the greater problem is that the Sonic Fandom on VBW is notoriously toxxic and aggressive to anyone who dares disagree with their assesement and every single thread becomes a disaster unless its filled with nothing but sycophants saying "I agree" to everything. It's why most of the staff don't interact with it, it's a lost cause.
 
I believe the greater problem is that the Sonic Fandom on VBW is notoriously toxxic and aggressive to anyone who dares disagree with their assesement and every single thread becomes a disaster unless its filled with nothing but sycophants saying "I agree" to everything. It's why most of the staff don't interact with it, it's a lost cause.
This is just meaningless whataboutism. The fact of the matter is that it was you, for no reason insulting others and your consistent behavior of doing this. Someone else doing wrong in a completely separate instance is not an excuse or justification.
 
Last edited:
This is just meaningless whataboutism. The fact of the matter is that it was you, for no reason insulting others and your consistent behavior of doing this.
Technically it wasn't for no reason. The Sonic fans were doing the exact same thing to users who dared disagree including staff members. But the moment they receive anything in turn they get super sad and get together to act like oppressed bullied victims.
 
Technically it wasn't for no reason. The Sonic fans were doing the exact same thing to users who dared disagree including staff members. But the moment they receive anything in turn they get super sad and get together to act like oppressed bullied victims.
I can understand the sentiment but I don't think "an eye for an eye" in this case is really going to solve anything.
 
For the record, I am fine with people disagreeing with me, but get tired of ad hominem personal attacks after a while.

Just calm down in general and stick to evaluating the issues at hand themselves instead.

Also, I am personally conflicted about Marvel and DC Comics as a whole, whereas I just plain dislike or really like plenty of other prominent verses in this wiki, but I make an effort to be as rational and unbiased regarding them as I can manage anyway.
 
Last edited:
Matthew, you literally said everyone who disagreed with you on this thread were attempting to win via steamrolling, and claimed that you “saw the plan.”
I was right, and other staff agreed with me, and the upgrade was rejected.

Isn't it funny how it's always the people whose upgrade attempts I was involved in foiling that get the mad the most at me existing? Bringing up an entirely unrelated thread with a wholly separate wank into the discussion is extremely hilarious to me.

"In this thread you called people out"

Yes I did and I would do it again.
 
I was right, and other staff agreed with me, and the upgrade was rejected.

Isn't it funny how it's always the people whose upgrade attempts I was involved in foiling that get the mad the most at me existing? Bringing up an entirely unrelated thread with a wholly separate wank into the discussion is extremely hilarious to me.

"In this thread you called people out"

Yes I did and I would do it again.
The point wasn’t about the upgrade the point was your claim was a blatant lie, and only made to discredit the other side. I couldn‘t care less whether or not this wiki allows Low 2-C Mario. It was extremely immature to attempt to use that as a way to discredit people. Also the staff didn’t agree with you on that point. They agreed that the upgrade wasn’t valid.
 
Just because people act badly doesn't give you the right to do so, especially when you are a long standing member, you do this over and over in several threads, there's comes a time when you are in the wrong, not everyone else, plus I don't think anyone said anything as bad as "you aren't normal" like you did, but since Matt himself wants to be banned from it then I suppose that should be done, but as everyone said nobody is forcing you to comment on threads you dislike
 
The point wasn’t about the upgrade the point was your claim was a blatant lie, and only made to discredit the other side. I couldn‘t care less whether or not this wiki allows Low 2-C Mario. It was extremely immature to attempt to use that as a way to discredit people. Also the staff didn’t agree with you on that point. They agreed that the upgrade wasn’t valid.
It wasn't a lie, everyone could see it. The dude was making several Mario Low 2-C upgrade threads in rapid succession, and after the fourth failed he resorted to making a giant thread where he threw everything at the wall at once. Several staff members and regular users called him out and the upgrade attempts were refuted.

Some people deserve to be discredit when they act blatantly dishonest.
 
Just because people act badly doesn't give you the right to do so, especially when you are a long standing member, you do this over and over in several threads, there's comes a time when you are in the wrong, not everyone else, plus I don't think anyone said anything as bad as "you aren't normal" like you did, but since Matt himself wants to be banned from it then I suppose that should be done, but as everyone said nobody is forcing you to comment on threads you dislike
No Versus Debater is normal. Normal people don't Versus Debate. And this includes me.
 
It wasn't a lie, everyone could see it. The dude was making several Mario Low 2-C upgrade threads in rapid succession, and after the fourth failed he resorted to making a giant thread where he threw everything at the wall at once. Several staff members and regular users called him out and the upgrade attempts were refuted.

Some people deserve to be discredit when they act blatantly dishonest.
You could simply make a habit of politely pointing that sort of thing out instead of being rude and hostile though. I would strongly suggest making a serious effort to shape up in that regard.
 
Instead of a six month ban, user Elhermanopadre should be banned for infinity as:

1) is Completely immature
2) insults people who disagree with him
3) shouts almost every time
4) got banned at least 3 times or so already here
5) once he got unbanned one time, he acted agressive against a user
6) consistently wanks Dragon Ball and says that the franchise always wins

He's already been a headache for the wiki multiple times, therefore, he should be permabanned for good
 
@TyranoDoom30 I agree, the guy has been doing my head in, he's not calmly listening to other parties and keep insulting them when he heats up, but I interacted with him in other places and yes, I hate to say but he has the worst attitude I have come across, when it comes to Dragon Ball fans.
But may I ask, has he done anything at all? His last few posts were just asking for translation requests, does that warrant for a ban in any way, despite his past?
 
Just wondering, where has he been if not here, considering he's banned as of now
Is he actually banned? I don't know to be fair with you, his last post is on the 1st of February asking for translations. The only time I have seen him toxic in this wiki is the thread here
Edit: Nevermind, all threads involving him and Dragon Ball are just full of stonewalling, fallacies and also strawmanning.
Filled with insults, threats and other childish *****.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top