- 3,333
- 3,802
No problem. I didn't report anyone. Staff just told me these things need to be posted here, which is why I did.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 6,645
- 6,526
Revised should be reverted for the time being.
ShakeResounding
He/Him- 10,456
- 11,244
Just a small hiccup; I have to remove a few portions of a blog and I can't reliably do so at the moment because I'm on mobile (and viewing it in Desktop doesn't help). As long as people are willing to wait until later today, I can do so effortlessly.
I know exactly which parts to remove, I just won't be able to do so until I get back home.
- 6,645
- 6,526
No problem take your time.
- 7,940
- 12,045
The summarized rules for acceptance are:
Minor Revisions: 1 Staff Approval
Normal Revisions: 2 Staff Approval
Revisions for Large/Popular Verses: 3 Staff Approval
And those staff obviously need evaluation rights (thread mods, admins, etc.)
If it's Tier 2 or higher, at least one admin needs to be involved.
-
So, looking at the thread, it is obviously not a minor revision, and LordGriffin1000 never fully agreed.
So the changes should be reverted, but I think a new thread should be made since that one is two years old and a lot of other stuff may have changed which affects it.
- 14,227
- 5,685
Can make one by the weekend
- 7,940
- 12,045
I agree with them that there wasn't good evidence to assume they and SeiyaRyuSei are the same person.Another member (MeiouHades) apparently also wants to make a ban appeal.
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
They did, however, have a pattern of aggressive and dramatic/toxic behavior, and continued this even after receiving a lesser punishment for it.
That said, it looks like this all happened over a year ago, and I know that a lot of growth can happen in a year, and is quite a long time to be banned but still want to participate.
So I would support giving them another chance, but in my eyes they have two strikes out of three.
- 178,202
- 91,345
- Thread starter
- #29,890
@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Agnaa @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist
We need your continuous help here.
We need your continuous help here.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 6,455
- 5,170
As someone who was wronged by him in the past and is the direct cause of at least one of his warnings, over the last year we’ve been communicating on other sites and his general tone has massively changed.Another member (MeiouHades) apparently also wants to make a ban appeal.
Antvasima
He no longer, at least in my opinion, communicates with aggressive undertones and is generally “more chill”. I think he’s grown as a person and should get another chance.
Edit: I should also note, I don’t use discord and am not in the server that got leaked by a certain person on RVR, nor has anyone asked me to advocate for his appeal.
ShakeResounding
He/Him- 10,456
- 11,244
Just wanted to inform you that I have now reverted changes due to the situation beforehand. Thank you for the patience!Thank you for helping out.
- 12,494
- 16,896
I could agree with this
- 34,768
- 42,253
MeiouHades I am willing to give another chance; I do not entirely remember the full extent of why they're banned. But so far, witnesses seem to speak in defense.
As for GodlyCharmander. My mistake, I should have double checked what "Catfishing" meant. I thought it simply meant making accounts with false identities; for example, pretending to be a transgender female when the user is actually a cisgendered male IRL. I didn't know "Luring people into a romantic relationship" had to be a requirement to be considered "catfishing." But I still have not moved from this conclusion, the ultimate final chance for me was the "No sock puppets created after September 2023 will result in him having a ultimate final chance to appeal post September 2024." And the fact is, Yellow Topaz was created before the deadline, which is what I consider his ultimate final chance being blown. But I also agreed that I will simply make that as a vote against coming back, and that I wouldn't mind letting him back if I am outvoted. But so far, it looks like staff majority agree with my side.
As for GodlyCharmander. My mistake, I should have double checked what "Catfishing" meant. I thought it simply meant making accounts with false identities; for example, pretending to be a transgender female when the user is actually a cisgendered male IRL. I didn't know "Luring people into a romantic relationship" had to be a requirement to be considered "catfishing." But I still have not moved from this conclusion, the ultimate final chance for me was the "No sock puppets created after September 2023 will result in him having a ultimate final chance to appeal post September 2024." And the fact is, Yellow Topaz was created before the deadline, which is what I consider his ultimate final chance being blown. But I also agreed that I will simply make that as a vote against coming back, and that I wouldn't mind letting him back if I am outvoted. But so far, it looks like staff majority agree with my side.
- 7,940
- 12,045
Reporting @Giannysmag for regularly making sexual/inappropriate comments, many of which are directed at other users.
I first noticed it in this thread, where I deleted their comment and gave them an informal warning.
I then looked at their post history and realized it's a pattern.
Case 1, Case 2, Case 3, Case 4, Case 5, Case 6, Case 7 (This one is particularly bad, though he deleted it.), Case 8, Case 9, Case 10, Case 11, Case 12.
And these are just what I collected in the first 20 of the 130 pages of their activity.
I think at the very least an official warning is in order, but given how some of it was clearly directed at other users and aggressive in nature, I think a ban of some duration is probably more fitting.
I first noticed it in this thread, where I deleted their comment and gave them an informal warning.
I then looked at their post history and realized it's a pattern.
Case 1, Case 2, Case 3, Case 4, Case 5, Case 6, Case 7 (This one is particularly bad, though he deleted it.), Case 8, Case 9, Case 10, Case 11, Case 12.
And these are just what I collected in the first 20 of the 130 pages of their activity.
I think at the very least an official warning is in order, but given how some of it was clearly directed at other users and aggressive in nature, I think a ban of some duration is probably more fitting.
- 6,645
- 6,526
Just to clarify, he's a good friend of mine. That first comment can be taken as a joke towards me, I'm pretty sure he didn’t mean any harm with it. But yeah, I know the rest were really inappropriate. So honestly, I do think he should at least get a warning. Banning one is not on me so I'll leave it to rest of the staff to take decision.
Edit:- actually on a second thought i don't find other as inappropriate as it seems like except for that second one.
Edit:- actually on a second thought i don't find other as inappropriate as it seems like except for that second one.
Last edited:
Giannysmag
Any/All- 6,325
- 10,540
This was bound to happen eventually huh.
Just like with Twilight most of these are directed towards people who I talk to and am friends with off site, to whom jokes like this are pretty mild. That being said I understand that this forum isn't a private discord chat and my behaviour was inappropriate.
As for the messages on the JJK thread... yea I've got no defense for those I was feeling real gooner brainedcan you blame me tho? look at how majestic Gojo looks
Just like with Twilight most of these are directed towards people who I talk to and am friends with off site, to whom jokes like this are pretty mild. That being said I understand that this forum isn't a private discord chat and my behaviour was inappropriate.
As for the messages on the JJK thread... yea I've got no defense for those I was feeling real gooner brained
- 178,202
- 91,345
- Thread starter
- #29,900
Well, I think that a regular warning seems sufficient for Giannysmag then, given the combined above information.
Also, we need to make a final active decision regarding MeiouHades, and our discussion about GodlyCharmander seems split/inconclusive.
Also, we need to make a final active decision regarding MeiouHades, and our discussion about GodlyCharmander seems split/inconclusive.
- 7,940
- 12,045
Well, while I understand that they may seem minor from certain perspectives, I think that regular talk of gooning (excessive masturbation), gay sex, etc. should be heavily discouraged, even among friends, and even jokingly, given that we have a large population of minors on this site.
Given it was mostly directed towards friends who were okay with it, I suppose I can be convinced to back down to a warning.
Well it seems like it's unanimous so far across five different staff members and a previous victim to give MeiouHades another chance, so it's probably fine to unban them. I don't think any special instructions are needed since they seem to already understand what they did wrong.Also, we need to make a final active decision regarding MeiouHades, and our discussion about GodlyCharmander seems split/inconclusive.
Last edited:
- 178,202
- 91,345
- Thread starter
- #29,902
Hmm. Given your new summary, I think that a very strict cease and desist warning seems most appropriate in this case.
Okay. It seems best if I write an explanation message that clarifies why I unblock them though. What should it say exactly?
- 34,620
- 35,071
Does it? I thought majority were opposed to them returning.and our discussion about GodlyCharmander seems split/inconclusive.
- 2,060
- 3,920
I think finepoint’s concerns are valid; I’d like to think I have a fairly liberal take on this sorta thing, but something as explicit as all of the above (particularly the deleted one cus lmao) are honestly not cool. A strong warning does seem appropriate.
REPEAL: Bambu, Finepoint, Ant
NO REPEAL: DDM, Damage, Reiner, Propellus, Catz
@Firestorm808 requested further information, so feel free to consider the latter portion of Bambu’s message and this summary.
It’s 5-3 — with Agnaa being “not sure” ?Well, three staff members are for giving him a final chance if I remember correctly.
REPEAL: Bambu, Finepoint, Ant
NO REPEAL: DDM, Damage, Reiner, Propellus, Catz
@Firestorm808 requested further information, so feel free to consider the latter portion of Bambu’s message and this summary.
if I write an explanation message that clarifies why I unblock them though. What should it say exactly?
Last edited:
- 2,900
- 3,350
Can someone tell me what this user said to me in original post?
CodeCCLL
vsbattles.fandom.com
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,259
I thought that comment was edited by also a moderator and that I would not be able to see the changes made by moderators.
- 2,900
- 3,350
i don't understand
i don't know if it was edited by a mod all i did was go to "Reply History" and look at what was there
- 6,645
- 6,526
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/834667410086821959/1370781495463252169/Screenshot_2025-05-10-20-45-13-81_e4424258c8b8649f6e67d283a50a2cbc.jpg?ex=6820bf40&is=681f6dc0&hm=0e5f0745aedaddb6f5cbed9ad6e9712af0d95e439173cb5cd7fa0a197c501e78&
If a mod had edited it, you'd see Edited by a Moderator instead of what above is.
If a mod had edited it, you'd see Edited by a Moderator instead of what above is.
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,259
How can this happen?
- 16,139
- 5,608
Don't bring him back, ever.
Though, I have a feeling he's back as another account, as this account I've been seeing oddly joined the forum the same day The Yellow Topaz (A GodlyCharmander sock) was last seen (May 30, 2024) and a week after it got banned, with this account possessing a similar toxicity level and similar verse interests to Charmander, although I don't want to jump to conclusions too soon and accuse them just yet.
Last edited:
- 7,940
- 12,045
Okay. It seems best if I write an explanation message that clarifies why I unblock them though. What should it say exactly?
I think Catzaflame's explanation message is to-the-point and well-written.
Though if you feel like it's not detailed enough, I could write a more elaborate one instead.
- 7,940
- 12,045
I edited it just to test it, and my edit does show up in the revision history.
https://media.**********.net/attachments/1005772797278158898/1370830186291138692/image.png?ex=6820ec99&is=681f9b19&hm=f5bc9ad61ef3987cb6f4e5a120aa6bd83a997ad1e86e5899769a23f330045420&=&format=webp&quality=lossless&width=1465&height=771
So I'm assuming their original message is just "Your existence is meaningless. Just like this debunk."
Which is really rude, by the way. Do you know this person, or are they being toxic?
CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,259
Yes. That's why I wondered if the original post was much worse.
- 7,940
- 12,045
I see. Well, it doesn't look like it's a pattern. They got slightly heated one other time but nothing serious.
So an informal warning/instruction is probably appropriate, I think.
- 5,187
- 4,307
This is definitely going to be a bit of a petty report, but still necessary.
Reporting @Hellscream for this comment in the thread. This shows he is not arguing based on actual facts or their profiles, but rather out of bad faith and disdain.
It should also be noted that he has shown extreme dislike for the verse in the past and was reported for it.
Also, look at CodeCCLL message wall (13 April 2025)
Not to mention how these actions are consistent, as I proved in an earlier post.
So yeah, to conclude, his last punishment seems to have accomplished nothing, and he still acts the same.
Reporting @Hellscream for this comment in the thread. This shows he is not arguing based on actual facts or their profiles, but rather out of bad faith and disdain.
It should also be noted that he has shown extreme dislike for the verse in the past and was reported for it.
Also, look at CodeCCLL message wall (13 April 2025)
Not to mention how these actions are consistent, as I proved in an earlier post.
So yeah, to conclude, his last punishment seems to have accomplished nothing, and he still acts the same.
Hellscream
He/Him- 2,539
- 1,426
Honestly, there should be sanctions for people that are reporting, just for the sake of reporting
"This shows he is not arguing based on actual facts or their profiles, but rather out of bad faith and disdain."
I joined the thread, to address misconceptions about Yhwach such as him not having "AE1", quoted the relevant parts and then backed down from the thread for personal reasons that i quoted. Could i have stated it differently sure? But im entitled to my opinion right?
You seem quite upset, with my opinion however.
(Probably not) You're just looking for every possible reason to report me lol.
