- 12,800
- 5,927
stop trying to change the subject and act all niceThanks Antvasima
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
stop trying to change the subject and act all niceThanks Antvasima
I genuinly didn't even knew about thatstop trying to change the subject and act all nice
There's a button on the top of the screen that you can press that says "watch", so you don't have to interrupt the report.Following
Sounds good to me.Even without the cursing and use of a different language to obfuscate it, it is an unnecessary display of pettiness and derailment. I would agree with a brief general forum ban (1 month sounds fine) and a permanent thread ban seems fine. If it becomes a continuing issue, a topic ban would be preferable.
A formal warning and a thread ban from this verse seems reasonable to me, but I am not sure for how long.Reporting @Dishano again. This scaler keeps opening new CRTs to ""rebunk"" debunks to the verse, without adding anything new to them. In my last report, it was decided that he would get an informal warning, but he didn't learn anything it seems. Since he just opened another thread, this would make his 4th open thread at the same time. Even though an overwhelming majority disagrees, even all the admins that come to his thread, he still refuses to acknowledge he is wrong and to close the thread. To make matters worse, he still didn't bother taking his time to learn how scaling tiers and abilities worked on this site, nor the rules.
His constant "upgrades" are nothing but repeated arguments that have been debunked and repeated regularly with no new information. This makes the CRTs nothing but a burden to be forced to repeatedly debunk...
To summarize - He is constantly ignoring arguments like before and repeating the same arguments as before, and it seems the informal warning did nothing, meaning he didn't change his behavior, proven by he has yet to close a single one of his 3 already open CRTs before opening a 4th one...
At this point, I think it's necessary to have a formal warning or a thread ban.
Closing the thread is a good start, but iirc, he has had a not so good track record. But I'd prefer to see his warning tracker; he hasn't been banned before, but his actions he kept up despite multiple warnings of inappropriate behavior is indeed not a good look.Reporting user @XXBenShapiroXx for the following derailing remarks and, using their own words, "tomfoolery" inappropriate for our forums:
I have also closed the thread for the massive derailment caused by these comments (as other users were starting to join in).
He doesn't have warnings documented in the tracker.Closing the thread is a good start, but iirc, he has had a not so good track record. But I'd prefer to see his warning tracker; he hasn't been banned before, but his actions he kept up despite multiple warnings of inappropriate behavior is indeed not a good look.
In fact, someone already had reported him before, but it went unnoticed because it was in the Fuji case which was much bigger.He doesn't have warnings documented in the tracker.
That's fine with me as wellYeah.
Given the prior report, I'm inclined to suggest something beyond an informal warning- still just warning, this time noted on the Tracker, combined with a thread ban if he pulls this in another thread. I think that works.
Reporting @Dishano again. This scaler keeps opening new CRTs to ""rebunk"" debunks to the verse, without adding anything new to them. In my last report, it was decided that he would get an informal warning, but he didn't learn anything it seems. Since he just opened another thread, this would make his 4th open thread at the same time. Even though an overwhelming majority disagrees, even all the admins that come to his thread, he still refuses to acknowledge he is wrong and to close the thread. To make matters worse, he still didn't bother taking his time to learn how scaling tiers and abilities worked on this site, nor the rules.
His constant "upgrades" are nothing but repeated arguments that have been debunked and repeated regularly with no new information. This makes the CRTs nothing but a burden to be forced to repeatedly debunk...
To summarize - He is constantly ignoring arguments like before and repeating the same arguments as before, and it seems the informal warning did nothing, meaning he didn't change his behavior, proven by he has yet to close a single one of his 3 already open CRTs before opening a 4th one...
At this point, I think it's necessary to have a formal warning or a thread ban.
A formal warning and a thread ban from this verse seems reasonable to me, but I am not sure for how long.
I'm not sure who this is, but i usually accept pretty much any friend request sent to me, and they started harassing me in my messages.
Is any user familiar on who this might be, if this isn't just a convenient throwaway account?
edited the first screenshot out, thanks for letting me know.I believe this should be approached privately to avoid sharing sensitive information.You almost showed your personal servers and chats
On this, so it doesn't get buried again.Reporting @Dishano again. This scaler keeps opening new CRTs to ""rebunk"" debunks to the verse, without adding anything new to them. In my last report, it was decided that he would get an informal warning, but he didn't learn anything it seems. Since he just opened another thread, this would make his 4th open thread at the same time. Even though an overwhelming majority disagrees, even all the admins that come to his thread, he still refuses to acknowledge he is wrong and to close the thread. To make matters worse, he still didn't bother taking his time to learn how scaling tiers and abilities worked on this site, nor the rules.
His constant "upgrades" are nothing but repeated arguments that have been debunked and repeated regularly with no new information. This makes the CRTs nothing but a burden to be forced to repeatedly debunk...
To summarize - He is constantly ignoring arguments like before and repeating the same arguments as before, and it seems the informal warning did nothing, meaning he didn't change his behavior, proven by he has yet to close a single one of his 3 already open CRTs before opening a 4th one...
At this point, I think it's necessary to have a formal warning or a thread ban.
If I may interject since I'm one of the main people who has done major CRTs and changes on the verse, I agree that even if a topic ban were to happen, it would be disingenuous to not let him comment on threads, especially the ones that he would obviously disagree with. That would be like killing the only opposition, clearly not a move I'd consider as fair.It is tempting to include a particular caveat in this topic ban that states that this does not extend beyond CRTs, and possibly even that commenting on CRTs is fine- only the creation of them is considered to be in error. I would like to hear from others on the specifics.
To be noted:With that said, it is a rule violation to stonewall unreasonably, and spamming the same threads repeatedly can be one in the right contexts. Looking through his postings, it does not seem as though he has really done the latter, as most of his threads are concerning different upgrades (always upgrades) he wishes to put through, such as regeneration, speed, and a Low 1-A tier upgrade. It is also a fact that each verse has a limited number of CRTs that it may have open, and that opening a great deal of pointless and baseless upgrades may needlessly impede progress on more thought-out efforts- not a rule violation, but a consideration I take into account with my next words.
This is actually false. First, because he actually has only made 3 threads. Second, while there is another active thread close to the time of his high-godly, immeasurable and Low 1-A attempts, the immeasurable one was already rejected by the time he posted the Low 1-A one. So he was actually completely in the clear there, unless I've missed another active thread (which would've been made by a different user anyways).Since he just opened another thread, this would make his 4th open thread at the same time.
I just realized I mistook one of the other threads as his (the bde) So I deeply apoligise for that one.This is actually false.
Thank you for helping out.Responded
For how long, and why?I want to get banned
Well I think it is better if I don't put a date, indefinite I would say. In the past few days, I have not slept well at all, I'm very tired and stressed. At this point debating is like an addiction it makes me happy and I have to break it.Thank you for helping out.
For how long, and why?
Nope just Vs battleOkay. No problem. And do you want to be banned in our wiki as well?
I did not use the word coward but the point was him trying to make fun my claim without actually debating me on that. However I'll better ignore him because he himself admitted being a troll.Yeah I don't think you were acting great but Hellformer's statements certainly appear to be intended towards schoolyard agitation. I'll try to keep an eye on the thread, but for now: @Hellformer consider this an informal warning to knock off the "be a man, coward, debate me about a children's cartoon bro" bullshit.
i wasn't even trolling in the debateI did not use the word coward but the point was him trying to make fun my claim without actually debating me on that. However I'll better ignore him because he himself admitted being a troll.
You admitted to Ben 10_Stick_nodesi wasn't even trolling in the debate
I did not use any bad word against you.i was being serious and not behaving like a total dick unlike you
You're right, but only because you instead said "Then be a man and pull up to debate instead of continuously running away while being fearhaxed." It's inappropriate, childish behavior, and trying to skirt around the fact that you said it by arguing semantics does not make me hopeful for an improvement in said behavior.I did not use the word coward but the point was him trying to make fun my claim without actually debating me on that. However I'll better ignore him because he himself admitted being a troll.
This is obviously not what is actually at issue. It is the rudeness, not the action of requesting engagement, that is the problem. Rudeness is in fact against the very first rule you should read on our site. I deem your actions to be at a greater severity of rudeness than usual, and so I have (I note again) informally (for now) warned you to stop it- continuing to be mean for the sake of it won't help you, is the point.@Mr. Bambu If me asking him to debate is not good behaviour from your perspective, then shouldn't you take some action against him saying this as well?