- 111
- 35
which is why competence shouldnt be brought up because there are really no grounds to itNo you can't, because then this devolves into mockery of the people involved in the threads, which is against our rules.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
which is why competence shouldnt be brought up because there are really no grounds to itNo you can't, because then this devolves into mockery of the people involved in the threads, which is against our rules.
YOU brought it upwell then he shouldnt have brought up something subjective as hell like competence and incompetence isnt necessarily a bad thing as you dont know what im comparing to
i dont think u quite understood what i was trying to say but thats fine because i worded it terribly and thats on me but even if i steel man this ive still done nothing offensive
Appreciate that, intended to get to the rest later but since you've highlighted an area of particular concern, I've gone ahead and looked through it. Compared to the others, I would agree- this is Vzearr's worst behavior in terms of outright rudeness. I will note that Vzearr is not on the Warning Tracker, and so I would disagree with a ban being doled out for this, especially given the other interactions Vzearr has had, but I would at the very least agree with a warning for his behavior in this, specific, thread.To save some time, for the Black Clover thread I'd recommend jumping straight to page 4 since that's where all of the noteworthy stuff for Vzearr's behavior is located
NoDumb question, If i have reported a user for vandalising a profile in the vandalazing report thread, Do i need to make the user report here or?
You then immediately pulled out a "There is something else wrong with this feat". This is an incredibly scummy thing to do after realizing a downgrade CRT you made is not going your way, and you did this firstly in the OP thread when everyone straight up disagreed with your methods, and there is a high probability that this could potentially happen again based on what M3X has stated (And I am heavily inclined to trust him because he has faced such scummy behavior before in the past, not to mention his far greater experience with evaluation and scaling of HST calcs than even I could muster because nobody else would evaluate these feats with a 10-meter pole). Not even moments before the thread closed you responded with how you had to do a JoJo thread and then gave up on the OP thread completely saying you couldn't be bothered to do the research because you don't care about OP scaling. And then you basically pull out of JoJo saying there's something wrong with it and in both cases you never care to elaborate what the new issues are so that we could resolve them. What kind of message do you think does this give to the rest of the people, regardless of your intentions?No, I realised my logic/debunk was wrong after it was pointed out. Then I thought about it again and realised there was another problem with the calc. Why would I want to downgrade for the sake of downgrading.
You misinterpreted what I said.You then immediately pulled out a "There is something else wrong with this feat". This is an incredibly scummy thing to do after realizing a downgrade CRT you made is not going your way.
Why would I do it again if I run the risk of being banned? That would make no sense.and you did this firstly in the OP thread when everyone straight up disagreed with your methods, and there is a high probability that this could potentially happen again based on what M3X has stated (And I am heavily inclined to trust him because he has faced such scummy behavior before in the past).
I didn't need to do research for the OP thread, it was a pretty simple debunk. Unless you're talking about the anime changing things from the manga, which was an incredibly small part of my thread.Not even moments before the thread closed you responded with how you had to do a JoJo thread and then gave up on the OP thread completely saying you couldn't be bothered to do the research because you don't care about OP scaling.
Why would I elaborate in a calc group thread? You know giving up on a thread doesn't mean you don't care about the verses scaling. It means either you were wrong or you're never going to get your point across so you give up on the thread (end it).And then you basically pull out of JoJo saying there's something wrong with it and in both cases you never care to elaborate what the new issues are so that we could resolve them.
You've just completely misunderstood my intentions (likely because you despise me).What kind of message do you think does this give to the rest of the people, regardless of your intentions?
There is no misinterpretation to be had here. You did not make a CRT out of good intentions. Hell, you closed a CRT out of impure intentions. Twice.You misinterpreted what I said.
Because your actions show you are not sincere about your work and you don't care if a calculation is right or wrong. You just run on personal bias and will find any way possible to make your arguments stick even when everyone else is telling you "No, it won't fly here".Why would I do it again if I run the risk of being banned? That would make no sense.
Yeah no, that goes against the very ethics of making CRTs on this wiki, we've banned people for straight up making dogshite CRTs with barely any effort or when they incessantly posted useless reddit threads. Heck, we even banned a guy for trying to bullrush a CRT when the entire verse was in the process of being revised for a major overhaul with significantly more experienced members involved in the process and bullrushing it would've jeopardized all their efforts.I didn't need to do research for the OP thread, it was a pretty simple debunk. Unless you're talking about the anime changing things from the manga, which was an incredibly small part of my thread.
You can't be serious.Why would I elaborate in a calc group thread?
You literally said so yourself, that you don't care about OP scaling. Why are you lying now?You know giving up on a thread doesn't mean you don't care about the verses scaling. It means either you were wrong or you're never going to get your point across so you give up on the thread (end it).
You already lied about "Just because I gave up on the thread doesn't mean I don't care about the verse's scaling", you're gonna lie to me about this now? Seriously?You've just completely misunderstood my intentions (likely because you despise me).
Who are you to call my intentions? I'm telling you I did it because I thought the calc was flawed and you're saying "nah you did it to downgrade" because I said I was wrong but I have another debunk?There is no misinterpretation to be had here. You did not make a CRT out of good intentions. Hell, you closed a CRT out of impure intentions. Twice.
What bias? If I think its wrong then I'll make a thread to discuss it.Because your actions show you are not sincere about your work and you don't care if a calculation is right or wrong. You just run on personal bias and will find any way possible to make your arguments stick even when everyone else is telling you "No, it won't fly here".
I'll just make them better then I guess? I put effort in my threads tbh, If I see a problem I state it.Yeah no, that goes against the very ethics of making CRTs on this wiki, we've banned people for straight up making dogshite CRTs with barely any effort or when they incessantly posted useless reddit threads. Heck, we even banned a guy for trying to bullrush a CRT when the entire verse was in the process of being revised for a major overhaul with significantly more experienced members involved in the process and bullrushing it would've jeopardized all their efforts.
Okay that's my bad. I should have added an 'anymore' because after 5 pages of debating I didn't care for OP scaling. But, the fact that I debated over it for 5 pages shows I did care for the scaling, initially.You literally said so yourself, that you don't care about OP scaling. Why are you lying now?
"I don't despise you", Also you: Complains about me in the pet peeve thread and then sends me a 5 paragraph essay detailing why you hate me.You already lied about "Just because I gave up on the thread doesn't mean I don't care about the verse's scaling", you're gonna lie to me about this now? Seriously?
Me? I'm a CGM. It's our job to see if you're making a CRT out of pure intentions or just for spite. And we've honed this experience for years at a time to ensure all CRTs pass fairly with as little conflict as possible.Who are you to call my intentions?
Because that's exactly what you did twice in a row and never bothered to explain what those debunks were when I asked for them. You just had the thread closed.I'm telling you I did it because I thought the calc was flawed and you're saying "nah you did it to downgrade" because I said I was wrong but I have another debunk?
Clover, M3X and I have made it abundantly clear to you in the prior comments. If you still can't see where you did wrong then that's your problem, not mine.What bias? I could give a flying **** about anime verses. If I think its wrong then I'll make a thread to discuss it.
You think you can just say this after all the problems you caused the people here listed out, without suffering from some consequences? Staff have already given you a third warning and were even contemplating giving you a topic ban to not make such CRTs in the first place.I'll just make them better then I guess? I put effort in my threads tbh, If I see a problem I state it.
That still doesn't excuse what you did, stop trying to exonerate yourself.Okay that's my bad. I should have added an 'anymore' because after 5 pages of debated I didn't care for OP scaling. But, the fact that I debated over it for 5 pages shows I did care for the scaling, initially.
ive justified every question beg that yall have done and i only get 'upset' because i expected more from the people of this website and my experience is just a bunch of no's and not really any reasoning or arguments. I would like to make another crt to show that i actually can when taken somewhat seriously but some other thread mod i think said i had to wait two months even though it was different reasoningI'm not sure I follow the reasoning of the last few posts. If you are in a position where you make a thread to criticise a feat, your criticism is disproven, and in the process you realise there could be another worthwhile criticism, it'd be natural to ask for the thread to be closed so you can make a new thread to detail your new criticism. I do believe this adds onto the underlying issue of frequent poor-quality CRTs, but the assertion here that this comment indicating he wanted to make a new thread proved Vzearr was just pushing a downgrading agenda seems like a stretch. Not to mention, in the context of the troubles with the other CRTs, it's to-be-expected that issues would arise like having an easily debunked thread before they had thought through every alternate argument. I have more than enough experience with insincere debating tactics - and more than enough headaches in dealing with them - to call them out when I see them, but I'm not so convinced that's what happening here. That being said, there is still the problem of frequently posting poor quality CRTs, and I would support a warning as with the other staff for this.
I would like to add, since it was brought up in passing, that I would also support a warning for Luci5678 on the basis of his behaviour on many of the same threads as Vzearr. Full disclosure - while it would be inappropriate to share details, Luci5678 did quite recently come to me with an HR report, which I rejected, and he seemed upset about the matter. I mention this not because the HR report is tied to this case, but because it could be taken (by Luci or others) as a source of bias on my part, so I feel it would be disingenuous to occlude it. Independently of that matter, however, Luci's conduct on many of these threads has a lot of room for improvement - the majority of his posts have been instances of throwing dirt at whomever he is debating with, most notably by accusing them of using fallacies (often very clearly without knowing what the fallacies in question are, but I digress) and proceeding to double-down and take on a patronizing and mocking tone whenever someone calls him out for it. For a user with not even a hundred comments on the forum thus far, the fact that such a pattern has already been established - and that he's caused troubles for many people already through this pattern - is something I believe needs to be nicked in the bud. I would support a strong warning for his conduct.
Strongly agreed. Bullying is not something that we should engage in in this community, especially not staff members.But at the same time, I don't appreciate y'all bombarding his wall with "LOL"s, you guys know better than to engage with that kind of behavior
That was a pretty instant unleashing of rudeness. You did react poorly, mind, but in this instance, given the 0-to-60 nature of the initial aggression, I think a kneejerk reaction isn't the worst one might expect of someone being accosted like that. Do try to be more patient in the future, or to just immediately shut down and send it here, lest it get into the discussion of "who was more wrong, someone who attacked or someone who attacked back worse".i just made a match for the non smurf list and @Jozaysmith? came out of nowhere and said this to me
"Can you stop opening stupid shit all the time are you that jobless this is like the 5th vsthread on slime you're doing, knowing how some of the outcomes will work out, its annoying"
Baal vs Rimuru
bro this match is for the non smurf list https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Baal,_The_Gate_of_Hell vs https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Rimuru_Tempest_(Light_Novel) SBA Speed Equalvsbattles.com
what the fk man
He does have unofficial warnings by you for being unnecessarily aggressive towards maou supporters and accusing dereck of using staff position to wank verses.@Jozaysmith? Play nice or refrain from posting. You have no warnings up to this point on the tracker for this sort of poor behavior so a warning this will remain
I admit, my memory sucks ass and I'd forgotten, although informal warnings are meant to be small enough that they won't contribute to a ban in the future. If you'd like, you could link me to them to refresh my memory, may change how I perceive this all, though.He does have unofficial warnings by you for being unnecessarily aggressive towards maou supporters and accusing dereck of using staff position to wank verses.
Alright, my bad.That was a pretty instant unleashing of rudeness. You did react poorly, mind, but in this instance, given the 0-to-60 nature of the initial aggression, I think a kneejerk reaction isn't the worst one might expect of someone being accosted like that. Do try to be more patient in the future, or to just immediately shut down and send it here, lest it get into the discussion of "who was more wrong, someone who attacked or someone who attacked back worse".
@Jozaysmith? Play nice or refrain from posting. You have no warnings up to this point on the tracker for this sort of poor behavior so a warning this will remain.
(This is a fairly minor issue, one feels, but if other staff feel the need to weigh in, they of course may do so)
I admit, my memory sucks ass and I'd forgotten, although informal warnings are meant to be small enough that they won't contribute to a ban in the future. If you'd like, you could link me to them to refresh my memory, may change how I perceive this all, though.
This case have died out like months ago, are you trying to achieve something?This is after a slime thread rejection. Also that him being grossed out of banner that dereck had was found out to be not true since before this comment of his he was asking dereck for "Sauce" of the banner. You gave him warning in the latter page of this. He also was on close call to get banned because of targetting dereck but dereck forgave him, I'll link the RVR report in few minutes here by editting it this post.Maou Gakuin Discussion Thread
Cap, wankers not working. No wanking material for another month, If JNCs schedule stays samevsbattles.com
Edit: his RVR discussion went to several ******* pages what the hell. I'll just link one post among all.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
I put it on the op as soon as Deagon explicitly stated his stance. again, that is not vote manipulation. i know how this user operates, they would have definitely called it vote manipulation if i added a staff member who seemed to approve but not state directly if they agree or not. Still...vsbattles.com
I understand now, thanks.Listen.
You need to stop responding like that.
Reiner was asked to bring up an old case because I had forgotten it. I already stated that it seemed as though you repented then and thus would not consider it significant enough to alter the ruling. This isn't a witch hunt or whatever else you might be labeling it as, this is due process and Reiner simply helped in that. The aggressive, immediate reaction is rarely the acceptable one. Please think about that before replying.
to add to this, they also seem to be threatening to report people that disagree with them.reporting @Chandra0706 for continuing to call people stupid in this thread he made
Are this novel is allowed to be in Vsbw? Mmorpg : Isekai World Online
Are this allowed ? Webnovel name : Mmorpg : Isekai World Online Problem : havent read it... but the author seems know about some powerfull stuff, and the author is same as created web novel called the great witch of magic academy Link character afbw...vsbattles.com
twice on page 4