- 9,098
- 9,410
Given the information brought up by Dread and points raised by Expectro, I am in support of rejecting the appeal at this time.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 667
- 408
I'm reporting @Marshadow29 for breaking his topic ban. He posted in the current Nasu CRT in Staff threads. It should be noted that on Marshadow's message wall, Mr. Bambu informed him that the topic ban would last until August 3rd 2023. While it is two days before the thread ban is up, it should be noted that Marshadow has been warned about the topic ban and evading it.
- 10,893
- 10,179
According to the same user, he said he asked Maverick_Zero_X permission to post. Although I'm pretty sure Maverik doesn't know about the topic ban and gave him permission, and because of that, he thought it was fine to post.
But I can not find on Maverik's message wall the post where the permission was given.
But I can not find on Maverik's message wall the post where the permission was given.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,674
- 3,730
to add to this, he had commented prior on the thread, but that comment was deleted
- 3,346
- 1,903
The last time I posted in a type-moon thread was around may 1st. as of yesterday, the 3 month time-limit had been met.
- 7,399
- 13,547
No, it hadn't. Bambu's post on your wall very clearly says August 3rd.
- 3,346
- 1,903
and just to clarify, 3 months is 90 days ,correct?
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,674
- 3,730
The topic ban you got where you acknowledge what Bambu says. And then your post on my wall from yesterday.
- 3,346
- 1,903
it has been a 90 day gap since then, or exactly 3 months. i adhered to my 3 month ban, no issue
- 7,399
- 13,547
Let me quote Bambu's post directly.
This is an official advisory: you have been topic banned from any and all threads relating to Nasuverse until August 3rd, 2023, as discussed here
There is no room for debate here. You were directly told August 3rd.
- 3,346
- 1,903
my official ban was voted for 3 months. the 3 month period is over.
- 11,729
- 18,418
Please stop trying to contest this. You were told August 3rd. Surely you can wait 2 more days
- 7,399
- 13,547
No, your official ban was until August 3rd, as that is what you were told. You do not get to decide to end your ban early.
- 3,346
- 1,903
it was voted upon that my ban would be 3 months,or a 90 day period. a 92-93 day period would be incorrect, as a month is commonly defined as a 30 day period, correct?
- 7,399
- 13,547
This is not a debate. The ban lasts until the day that the admin implementing it says, which in this case was August 3rd. There is no wiggle room here whatsoever, as it directly says August 3rd on your wall. Stop commenting here, it is a waste of everyone's time as you are definitively wrong on this.
- 3,346
- 1,903
that would be a small oversight on bambu's part as im sure no one here voted for 3 months and a few days
- 11,729
- 18,418
You're going to only make your punishment worse if you continue to keep contesting something that has repeatedly been explained to not be up for debate. Seriously, please stop.
- 7,399
- 13,547
Given your obstinacy on this subject, cluttering up the RVR with this argumentation that your ban should end earlier than what an Admin directly told you, and the fact that you violated your topic ban twice during the period of the ban, I am persuaded to advocate that your topic ban should be extended.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,637
- 19,327
Marshadow was given a specific date at which their topic ban expired (that is, August 3rd, two days from now). This is very silly behavior when you were given an exact date at which your topic ban would be up, I really don't get why you're making this more difficult than it is. I would not personally push for an extension of a topic ban but I do agree that it is a reasonable response to the above.
What sort of extension would you want, Deagon?
What sort of extension would you want, Deagon?
- 7,399
- 13,547
I wouldn't mind an additional month, but if others are against it or want something shorter I'm not married to that.
- 14,852
- 20,842
I’m fine with an additional month.
- 11,729
- 18,418
An additional month makes sense. So it’d be lifted on September 3rd
- 30,159
- 25,513
That also seems fine to me.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,637
- 19,327
Unanimous agreement, I've posted on their wall the updated end-date of their topic ban. @Marshadow29 Do not be confused: you are topic banned until September 3rd, 2023.
We're free to move on now, I think.
We're free to move on now, I think.
- 9,098
- 9,410
While the topic is done, for full transparency, I had asked Maverick about this in private couple hours ago. Maverick confirmed to me they indeed gave them permission to comment once.
Edit: Nvm, I was mistaken about the second comment.
- 121
- 58
Okay sorry for bringing this up again despite a resolution already being reached but I feel like this information shouldn't go ignored. Steezstifler was not his only alt.
He also used akasakelulcifer as an alternative account even after he was banned.
Ant even banned him for being a sock puppet of ClownYagami.
So yea he's used at least 2 alts and continued to make threads with another even after being banned on the forums.
- 14,942
- 12,512
Vapourrrrr: As I initially advocated extending that ban to 2 months, and this return days after the end of that 1 month ban hasn't inspired much confidence, I'd support banning him until the end of the month.
Marshadow: I agree with the topic ban extension after the obstinate behaviour here. Instead of initially seeking clarity, they dug their heels in after being given a clear answer. Without that I would've seen it as a mistake and let it slide, but that reaction doesn't bode well for good behaviour in threads.
Marshadow: I agree with the topic ban extension after the obstinate behaviour here. Instead of initially seeking clarity, they dug their heels in after being given a clear answer. Without that I would've seen it as a mistake and let it slide, but that reaction doesn't bode well for good behaviour in threads.
- 800
- 146
For what exactly ?
You advocated me getting banned for "stealth CRT'S" but you gave no proof as to why you believed I made a stealth CRT, I severely disagree with a 2 month ban especially because I don't believe I made a stealth CRT, and if I don't believe I made a stealth CRT you also shouldn't
- 14,942
- 12,512
No, the extension to two months was for creating a sockpuppet after you were banned and using it to send annoyed messages at a user of the wiki.
Creating sockpuppets to get around bans is against the rules.
Creating sockpuppets to get around bans is against the rules.
- 800
- 146
It wasn't to get around a ban, it was too message ANTVASIMA, although that did happen I would like to make it clear I'm sorry, banning me for another month is just un needed though, I get that its against the rules but really 1 month is a long time and it's not like I have gotten worse since then, I've been pretty active and haven't went to any TR CRTS because I learned from my mistakes and know I get angry when I debate in those threads
Pls don't ban me
- 165,428
- 72,762
- Thread starter
- #21,435
Well, I don't mind that Vapourrrrr created an extra account specifically only to message me without any subterfuge involved, but he hasn't behaved well in other ways after he returned and needs to shape up his rather childish behaviour quite a lot.
Maybe a warning would be sufficient?
Maybe a warning would be sufficient?
- 3,083
- 1,659
- 14,942
- 12,512
As I said, the issue isn't that Vapourrrr used the alt to message you, it's that he used the alt to send annoyed messages at the person who reported him.
While this is admittedly a minor use for a sockpuppet, it is still one, which is why I suggested a 1 month extension to the ban, rather than the more typical permaban.
John: Left a warning on their wall.
While this is admittedly a minor use for a sockpuppet, it is still one, which is why I suggested a 1 month extension to the ban, rather than the more typical permaban.
John: Left a warning on their wall.
- 800
- 146
Please don’t ban me, I’m sorry
- 15,870
- 8,969
I say a one month ban is very much warranted. This borders on trolling if nothing else.
- 800
- 146
How is it trolling, I didn’t even do anything wrong, you guys are so overly strict with no reasoning
I got one month because of a stealth CRT, you didn’t give sufficient proof though, you guys don’t realise how long a month is, it’s a long ahh time, rethink this, ANT usually suggests the best things here and honestly I think you guys are severely mis judging my case especially since you can’t even prove my “stealth CRTS”
Similar threads
