Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[Antvasima]

The current staff consensus seems to be that Tatsumi should be topic-banned from MG discussion threads for two months, I think. Or was that discussion about Strym?

 

[Deagonx]

Or was that discussion about Strym?

Both. For Strym it was Undertale:

Strym is a disruptive member with increasing irregularities in his behavior. I would say the baseline of a VSBW member is someone who may turn to rudeness if so prompted, but Strym has in recent days been going well beyond this to defend Undertale from perceived threats (that is, Topaz, above).

If Strym cannot behave even after already receiving a warning, I have misgivings about letting him off with another- after this, action ought to be taken.

For the record I would agree with a shorter topic ban being given out now- maybe a month.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Topic banned from MG for a time, I believe.

I guess I should give my own perspective here.

Normally, I don't see these rude comments as nothing more than warning-worthy unless a repeated pattern of toxicity is shown in direct relation to them.

Unfortunately for Tatsumi, I will have to say he has crossed this threshold. Not so long ago we even determined that certain MGK supporters, on which he was also cited, were balancing on a very delicate line that could even result on a topic ban, but decided to give them one more chance as the only active supporters of the verse and whatnot.

See, Tatsumi once more has come forth proving that topic ban may have been warranted afterall. These discussions just bring too much frustration from him, and try as we might to be understanding and patient, there comes a point we need to put the foot down. Two reports in less than two weeks he's been involved, alongside accusations of bias towards staff.

So it all comes down to: When is it enough? I will have to support a topic ban. Did it back then, and have been shown that it was the right call too.

For how long I will let other staff decide.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. So are the current conclusions a one month topic-ban for Strym from Undertale threads, and a two months topic-ban from MG threads for Tatsumi then?

 

[Antvasima]

I understand. Elde's comment was a bit of an edge case because, IMO, the phrase "mentally weak" is not intuitively transposed to mental illness or disabilities and just comes off as a generic insult, and the more pressing issue was the general hostility. So I wasn't sure if clarification was needed and it presented the risk of turning into another argument that I felt we needed desperately to prevent. But I apologize for overstepping. I will adjust accordingly

Anyway, thank you very much for trying to be reasonable here.

 

[Damage3245]

Okay. So are the current conclusions a one month topic-ban for Strym from Undertale threads, and a two months topic-ban from MG threads for Tatsumi then?

Sounds fine to me.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thank you for helping out.

That is probably good to apply then.

 

[Deagonx]

We also agreed between myself, you, DDM, and Bambu, for a 2 month topic ban for MichaelJZero. And that wraps up all of the goings on.

 

[Crabwhale]

@Crabwhale @Maverick_Zero_X @Damage3245 @LephyrTheRevanchist @KingTempest @Theglassman12

Would any of you mind taking a look at my report and help us decide what the best course of action is? We are considering a short topic ban or perhaps just a strict warning at the moment and would just like to get a bit more input before deciding.

Apologies but this case kinda spiralled beyond my ability to follow a few days ago.

 

[Antvasima]

We also agreed between myself, you, DDM, and Bambu, for a 2 month topic ban for MichaelJZero. And that wraps up all of the goings on.

Hmm. There is likely a big risk that he will continue to cause problems afterwards, but okay then.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Hmm. There is likely a big risk that he will continue to cause problems afterwards, but okay then.

Nothing stops us from taking further action then, of course.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, agreed.

 

[Deagonx]

Tatsumi reached out to me on Discord and asked the following:

Hey about my thread ban, is there a way to block members from commenting in general like from content revisions or versus threads? I think I'll prefer that

 

[StrymULTRA]

To be fair you don't. From what I know about Topic Bans, you just have to patrol their activity and see if they commented on threads on X verse.

It's something that happened back then with @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara with her thread bans from Touhou ones from what I saw.

 

[Antvasima]

That is not possible as far as I know, no. They have to avoid commenting in the specified threads on their own.

 

[Shmooply]

Tatsumi reached out to me on Discord and asked the following:

You could thread ban him from any new Maou Gakuin thread, I guess that's what he's refering to. But still, it's up to him to actively avoid posting on those threads if he's topic banned instead of requesting for constant thread bans.

 

[Reiner04]

Tatsumi reached out to me on Discord and asked the following:

If he get banned from the forum as whole for 1 or 2 month, he'll be able to read the threads but not comment. You can ask him if this approach will do as his interest is mostly in mgk from what I see.

 

[ImmortalDread]

You could thread ban him from any new Maou Gakuin thread, I guess that's what he's refering to. But still, it's up to him to actively avoid posting on those threads if he's topic banned instead of requesting for constant thread bans.

Except the general discussion. Thread ban only effect vs thread and content revision unless specified otherwise.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, he is topic-banned from any MG threads where he might misbehave further, which includes content revision and versus threads, and as far as I am aware general discussions as well, if they risk to turn controversial.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

This user vandalized this profile

 

[ShionAH]

This user vandalized this profile

Probably a clueless user, trolls most of the time do stuff like boundless on popular characters

 

[Antvasima]

I gave them a warning:

Yer39ds

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Expectro2000xxx]

Reporting the user @Vapourrrrr for changing Yor speed stat without any justification or crt (I already readded it).

 

[Just_a_Random_Butler]

Reporting the user @Vapourrrrr for changing Yor speed stat without any justification or crt (I already readded it).

He did it again after you reverted their edit.

 

[Expectro2000xxx]

He did it again after you reverted their edit.

Thanks for undo it, I explained to him in my wall that the speed rating have an accepted calc and a accepted crt to apply it to the profile, as well as told him that he can't change a profile without crt, so if he do it again then more serious action will be needed.

 

[Vietthai96]

Reporting this user for vandalizing two profiles, his edit was reverted

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Reporting this user for vandalizing two profiles, his edit was reverted

Blocked

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

He did it again after you reverted their edit.

How long should I block him for? He has an account here and messages people, but if he's ignoring warnings, that does sound like grounds for a ban.

 

[Deagonx]

He's made a CRT for it now, so I think he got the message.

 

[Vapourrrrr]

Don't you think blocking me is an over reaction, I'm still kinda new to this and removed them on reasonable grounds

Blocked

 

[Expectro2000xxx]

Don't you think blocking me is an over reaction, I'm still kinda new to this and removed them on reasonable grounds

No, you actually didn't removed it on reasonable grounds, you did so just because you thought it was wrong. However I also believe you don't need to be blocked as you have be warned already and seems to have taken the warning since you created a crt.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Ya, I think block was overreaction, simply send the guidelines since he is new user. Unblock the user, and ban the alt.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Don't you think blocking me is an over reaction, I'm still kinda new to this and removed them on reasonable grounds

I didn't block you, but rather someone else who was upgrading DB Heroes profiles to 1-A to High 1-A.

But as for you, I suppose a warning is fine, I was just going off the comments that reported you.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

i have reverted the edit

this man made usopp tier 0

Usopp

Usopp serves as the crew's sharpshooter and previously served as the (barely competent) repairman for the ship. He's the son of Yasopp, a sharpshooter serving under Shanks, and comes from the East Blue. Usopp had a reputation on his home island of being a serial liar who claimed that pirates...

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Damage3245]

@ShionAH This is an official warning for trolling on the Rule Violation Reports thread. Next time you do it will result in a temporary ban.

I'll block the user who vandalized.

 

[Crabwhale]

Damage got it before I did, but I agree with his verdict. Also.

@Ped2018 You refrain from dumbassery in the future, as well. This is the RVR, not a F&G thread.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Not much to it, just letting y'all know I dropped a warning on @azontr's wall regarding poor behavior on wiki management threads, specifically misconstruing arguments from DontTalk to paint the man as saying much worse shit than what he was. As azontr is one of several serial re-offenders in terms of poor behavior on wiki management threads, this felt justified.

 

[azontr]

I am a serial offender?

 

[DaMonkeMan]

Not much to it, just letting y'all know I dropped a warning on @azontr's wall regarding poor behavior on wiki management threads, specifically misconstruing arguments from DontTalk to paint the man as saying much worse shit than what he was. As azontr is one of several serial re-offenders in terms of poor behavior on wiki management threads, this felt justified.

https://vsbattles.com/profile-posts/57131/

What about this?

 

[Mr. Bambu]

He did that too, but generally speaking calling people a "dickwad" is an indicator of tone, not a rule violation.