-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 18,393
- 14,323
Were you not before perma banned for a week? I guess the staff did not unban you yet
- 31,399
- 27,689
The previous block had the IP field checked. But the block was only for a week so it should have expired by now.
- 31,399
- 27,689
The block can't be removed. It has already expired.
- 4,299
- 2,800
Have you tried logging out and logging back in again? A similar situation happened to me a while back and that seemed to work.
- 4,769
- 7,810
Are you using a VPN or something?
- 21,469
- 30,790
Doesn't say it's blocked for me
azontr
He/Him- 40,579
- 50,192
- 4,769
- 7,810
That could be it if its an ip that's already blocked
- 31,459
- 34,319
I was pretty sure I kept the "Block IP Address" box unchecked since it was only suppose to be for a week But if that's what fixed the issue, then I guess things are fine. Though, normally Fandom wants to avoid blocking entire VPNs as to not block thousands of innocent users in the process.
- 8,827
- 9,403
Nah its uncomplicated, what I think happend is that Azontr's VPN used a IP that may have been blocked in the past, especially considering our mass sockpuppet arc back then. Just unlucky on his end.
- 13,903
- 5,405
My thoughts exactly
- 11,972
- 11,579
Sure
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #14,898
That is the by far most likely reason, yes.
Noneless21
He/Him- 7,508
- 5,168
someone changed this profile's tier rating to 1-A
- 25,017
- 27,011
I reverted the changes.
They seem to be new to the wiki and might not know how the works. I'd say best to give them the benefit of the doubt and leave them with a warning.
They seem to be new to the wiki and might not know how the works. I'd say best to give them the benefit of the doubt and leave them with a warning.
Jamesthetaker
He/Him- 6,754
- 1,853
The user Mam383829 has made multiple changes to this profile without any CRT or such.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #14,903
speedster352
He/Him- 17,550
- 1,788
The op applied the changes when we were still debating and with only a few staff approval.
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #14,905
Sir_Ovens blocked the vandal.
Should we contact Mam via his wiki message wall to see if he seem reasonable enough to reduce the ban to a month or so?
Jamesthetaker
He/Him- 6,754
- 1,853
Well, I think we could give him a chance to explain himself.
speedster352
He/Him- 17,550
- 1,788
Has anyone taken care of this? Its a rule violation
Lugh_Tuathe_Dé
He/Him- 3,706
- 2,077
It is not. It is past grace iirc and there were 3 staff that has agreed.
speedster352
He/Him- 17,550
- 1,788
There is no grace and he did not counter his debunked arguments that many people disagreed with it.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
If he still managed to convince 3 staff, that’s enough to pass a CRT like the one above
Lugh_Tuathe_Dé
He/Him- 3,706
- 2,077
There were only few people bruh plus staff>normal members. You know that staff votes weight more than normal members. Plus iirc many agree as well, and it is past grace the last comment by Makai was august.
speedster352
He/Him- 17,550
- 1,788
The reasons were not concrete enough and have been debunked even one piece gets regeneration negation from someone bruising macro with mid-regeneration yet nnt need to get their regeneration downgraded?
Not enough we were still arguing
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
In your personal opinion. If staff still agree with the CRT, it’s hardly been “debunked”
- 8,827
- 9,403
Enough. He made his report. Let Staff decide the ruling
Lugh_Tuathe_Dé
He/Him- 3,706
- 2,077
Stop the thread has been closed and it is not RVR worthy, you'll be derailing if you continue this.
speedster352
He/Him- 17,550
- 1,788
That was before the new arguments you can't just ignore arguments and apply change its against the rules
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 22,784
- 22,312
From what I can tell the "new arguments" are scarcely different than the old arguments. It's a matter of interpretation and most people just disagreed with your interpretation- hardly a big deal. Furthermore, while I won't speak on the entire thread (largely out of a lack of desire to read the entire thread), I will say that I agree with those staff member's analysis on the point of contention, even after reading it.
Not a rule violation, so do please move on.
Not a rule violation, so do please move on.
- 31,459
- 34,319
Super Ascended Sean Pazdera is asking me about his permanent ban. He says he thinks he matured enough to come back which I can't really argue one way or the other.
I remember there being quite a lot of reasons for why he was banned, including a period in which he made use of a sock puppet account. And that was made back in 2016, but was leaked to have the exact same IP Address as Sean. Which he mention it was created at his house, but the connection would imply they live in the same household.
If someone who knows them can give us reminders, that would be fine. Otherwise, should we give him a final chance?
I remember there being quite a lot of reasons for why he was banned, including a period in which he made use of a sock puppet account. And that was made back in 2016, but was leaked to have the exact same IP Address as Sean. Which he mention it was created at his house, but the connection would imply they live in the same household.
If someone who knows them can give us reminders, that would be fine. Otherwise, should we give him a final chance?
- 11,972
- 11,579
I'm trying to change it
Similar threads
- Locked
