- 42,758
- 37,001
From memory it was hard-core lolicon ****.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 15,436
- 7,857
Yeah, I don't care about the details. Lolicon **** is lolicon ****. He's staying permabanned. Why is this even a discussion?
- 42,758
- 37,001
Because two lenient people are weighing in on the discussion.
- 15,436
- 7,857
Why are we being lenient about god damn pornography? We've permabaned people over far less.
- 16,263
- 10,712
- 42,758
- 37,001
A warning is all that is required for you
- 15,436
- 7,857
Bern, derailing doesn't get you a ban. At worst, it's warning worthy. You're fine, just don't do it again.
- 11,135
- 14,120
If FANDOM gave him a temporary block for it, I don't mind giving him a second chance. Besides that one incident of posting ****, I don't remember him doing anything malicious. If he has learned his lesson, he will behave from now on. If he acts up again, we can permaban him then. I do remember him derailing some important threads and being annoying at times, but I'm hoping that wouldn't be an issue.
- 167,855
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #5,290
Because he was a longtime productive member, and it is as yet uncertain what exactly that he actually did.
- 15,436
- 7,857
I distinctly remember Schnee outright celibrating when he heard about the ban, for what that's worth.
- 42,758
- 37,001
if we let him back in, we will have him under a microscope, one slipup and he is gone. No questions asked. That is my judgement.
- 4,299
- 2,800
They appear to be responding to points made on this thread on Antvasima's message wall.
- 31,457
- 34,316
I'm neutral in the long run on letting him back, but I'd think the staff who know more context should comment before letting him back. And possibly a few people in the HR group. But I agree that letting him back should be within a heavy tight spot.
- 4,299
- 2,800
Give them a chance, but watch them heavily. I do not care if they have helped in the past, I care that they have worked out their issues for what they say had been a few years, and they feel they are ready to come back. If they do something malicious against the community again, I would advocate for another ban.
- 13,225
- 21,036
- 13,225
- 21,036
Okay, that makes sense.
XSOULOFCINDERX
They/Them- 21,374
- 9,047
Keep on eye on this guy. I don't think he's broken any rules, but he's definitely not going by the Profiles with his Arguments and Stonewalling Threads out of pure stubbornness.
- 167,855
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #5,309
- 21,469
- 30,790
Yes, he could be given a chance
- 1,690
- 1,191
I’m confused? Why is he asking you to change his pfp?
- 167,855
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #5,313
Wasn't it in another thread that he wanted me to change his profile picture?
- 6,594
- 1,713
Can I just say that based on his behavior, he really seems similar to another user from another versus forum I was on from years back who went by this exact name? I mean, really, dude named Crayons? Stonewalls and acts like a bit of a troll? Just saying he reminds me of someone by the same name based on how he acts, and the uncannily same name isn't helping, so, yeah, keep an eye open.
- 167,855
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #5,315
- 5,554
- 2,329
I think it's fine if they come back; worst case scenario, if they post another pic like that, we just ban them again. I don't recall them being actively malicious or something.
- 7,413
- 3,301
^ This.
- 10,065
- 5,294
If he's aware of what he did wrong, and remembers to not do what he did again, than I'm fine with giving him a second chance.
Similar threads
- Locked
