- 43,103
- 37,243
From memory it was hard-core lolicon ****.I think that he changed his avatar to a lolicon one, but do not know if it was explicit or not. I do not remember exactly what happened anymore.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From memory it was hard-core lolicon ****.I think that he changed his avatar to a lolicon one, but do not know if it was explicit or not. I do not remember exactly what happened anymore.
.I derailed a bit on this thread, i guess i should take few days ban.
A warning is all that is required for you
Because he was a longtime productive member, and it is as yet uncertain what exactly that he actually did.Why are we being lenient about god damn pornography? We've permabaned people over far less.
I’m confused? Why is he asking you to change his pfp?
Wasn't it in another thread that he wanted me to change his profile picture?I’m confused? Why is he asking you to change his pfp?
Can I just say that based on his behavior, he really seems similar to another user from another versus forum I was on from years back who went by this exact name? I mean, really, dude named Crayons? Stonewalls and acts like a bit of a troll? Just saying he reminds me of someone by the same name based on how he acts, and the uncannily same name isn't helping, so, yeah, keep an eye open.
Keep on eye on this guy. I don't think he's broken any rules, but he's definitely not going by the Profiles with his Arguments and Stonewalling Threads out of pure stubbornness.
@AKM sama @SomebodyData @The_real_cal_howard @Dragonmasterxyz @Celestial_Pegasus @Soldier_Blue @Saikou_The_Lewd_King @Andytrenom @DarkDragonMedeus @Wokistan @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Ogbunabali @AbstractionsSo is it fine if we give The God of Procrastination a final chance?
^ This.I think it's fine if they come back; worst case scenario, if they post another pic like that, we just ban them again. I don't recall them being actively malicious or something.