-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports - 48
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
- 15,711
- 7,686
I agree and we also have Site Disclaimer about spoilers.Antvasima said:
- For our visitors, please be aware that this wiki contains spoilers for various media, so read it at your own risk.
- 39,343
- 15,150
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2919300#52
Gilga just back from his ban and look what he did in that thread above.
Gilga just back from his ban and look what he did in that thread above.
- 10,748
- 6,476
What did he do?
- 39,343
- 15,150
You can just look at that thread, but in short accusing the supporters as wank and say the profile is wank.
- 15,431
- 7,853
I mean, that's a rude thing to do but I'm not sure it's against the rules.
- 39,343
- 15,150
Back from ban after what he done yet still rude is not against rule?
- 15,636
- 5,391
I... don't think Gilga broke any rules with those comments beyond being blunt and slightly confrontational.
She didn't accuse supporters as wankers either, she accused a profile of being "wanked".
She didn't accuse supporters as wankers either, she accused a profile of being "wanked".
- 10,748
- 6,476
I am not sure if he's just trying to make a funny remark or legitimately trying to create trouble. It's quite possibly the former so I wouldn't think too much of this.
- 39,343
- 15,150
Veloxt1r0kore said:
- 15,636
- 5,391
The 'violation' seems so minor I'm doubtful about any sort of action beyond a warning even with that in mind.Veloxt1r0kore said:
- 40,446
- 12,912
Even a warning seems too much. I mean, I call things wanked all the time.
- 10,748
- 6,476
Can we not go the "the guy was in trouble before so let's make any disagreeable action he takes unacceptable from now on" route
Yes prior history is important but let's not focus solely on that and ignore all other context.
Yes prior history is important but let's not focus solely on that and ignore all other context.
- 39,343
- 15,150
I mean after the ban he's not behaved.
- 15,636
- 5,391
Words cannot express how much I agree with that comment, not just for this situation but for many things discussed on this thread prior.Andytrenom said:
- 15,431
- 7,853
Agreed, she hasn't even done anything yet. Wait until there's actually something to report.
- 12,522
- 3,488
Saying a character is wanked isn't report worthy though.
- 39,343
- 15,150
Whatever you all mean, in fact he another bacteria who soon will cause a massive chaos and should be exterminate soon.
- 8,438
- 3,292
You referring to a person as literally bacteria is going to get you "exterminated" if you keep it up, Vex.Veloxt1r0kore said:
That is the most unacceptable thing posted here so far.
- 10,748
- 6,476
Velox you're calling a user a bacteria and saying we should exterminate them. Do I have to explain what's wrong with that?
- 15,431
- 7,853
Dude, chill. Being confrontational is not a crime. We're not a bunch of authoritarians. We don't exterminate everything that disagrees with us. Now drop the issue until there's actually an issue to begin with.Veloxt1r0kore said:
- 39,343
- 15,150
Gilga history already proof why he's a ignorant user, get banned, back from ban and yet still not behaving.
- 15,431
- 7,853
And? She hasn't broken the rules. End of discussion.Veloxt1r0kore said:
- 39,343
- 15,150
No, that's indicate Gilga will still continue, yes he doesn't broke any rules from you all views, but if you all ignoring him, sooner he will cause many many problem and BOOM!!
- 15,431
- 7,853
We'll ban her as soon as she does cause problems. But she hasn't caused any yet, so this discussion is pointless.
- 10,748
- 6,476
Velox. Drop this.
Everyone has already explained why the report isn't action worthy and you being this stubborn in getting Giga punished doesn't help anyone.
Everyone has already explained why the report isn't action worthy and you being this stubborn in getting Giga punished doesn't help anyone.
- 8,438
- 3,292
Stop being so paranoid. If he actually does something report worthy we will cross that bridge when we come to it, but right now drop this. Saying something is wanked is not report worthy. Now move on before you say anything worse than what you already have.Veloxt1r0kore said:
- 39,343
- 15,150
You guys just too soft tbh, but fine!!
- 15,431
- 7,853
Vel, look at it this way. Someone has just gotten out of jail on parole. The person rudely shoves you out of his way while walking down the street. You react by saying that this is a sign he plans to continue his previous criminal behavior and he should immediately be thrown back in jail. See the issue? That's basically how you're acting here.
- 39,343
- 15,150
That's indicate he doesn't regret what he done.
- 5,554
- 2,327
Yes, thoughtcrime I agree.
- 15,431
- 7,853
We are members of a vs community, not members of The Party from 1984.
- 39,343
- 15,150
And? Just because we are member of community doesn't mean we can't ignore something troublesome who already make a trouble in the past.
Anyway i'm done since i already said my thought here.
Anyway i'm done since i already said my thought here.
- 10,748
- 6,476
Best to not argue further, the decision is already made.
- 15,711
- 7,686
In an argument, wank would be closely associated with Fallacy. Saying someone wanks is similar to calling someone a wanker which is a derogatory term as listed on VS Battles Staff. The word "wank", itself, is a derogatory term: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-spanish/wank
Its definition is closely associated to "bullshit", in our context: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-spanish/bullshit
Its definition is closely associated to "bullshit", in our context: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-spanish/bullshit
- Wanker: A derogatory term used to describe users who inflate character or verse statistics to massive levels over faulty logic or vague evidence. Use of this term is generally frowned upon, but even Staff members have been known to use it when agitated or tired.
- 15,711
- 7,686
I think there should be a thread to classify it as a concrete degoratory term.
I get anger and stress but insults are insults and there should be no double-standard when we have this rule.
I get anger and stress but insults are insults and there should be no double-standard when we have this rule.
- Refrain from spamming, trolling, threatening, using derogatory comments of any form (ethnic, homophobic, belittling the disabled or mentally ill, etcetera), and rude, vulgar, sexist, etcetera offensive language.
- 10,748
- 6,476
>Classifying wank as a derogatory term
No
No
- Status
