• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports - 48

Status
Not open for further replies.
Crabwhale is probably correct.
 
I... don't think Gilga broke any rules with those comments beyond being blunt and slightly confrontational.

She didn't accuse supporters as wankers either, she accused a profile of being "wanked".
 
I am not sure if he's just trying to make a funny remark or legitimately trying to create trouble. It's quite possibly the former so I wouldn't think too much of this.
 
Veloxt1r0kore said:
Veloxt1r0kore said:
Back from ban after what he done yet still rude is not against rule?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
The 'violation' seems so minor I'm doubtful about any sort of action beyond a warning even with that in mind.
 
Andytrenom said:
Can we not go the "the guy was in trouble before so let's make any disagreeable action he takes unacceptable" route
Yes prior history is important but let's not focus solely on that and ignore all context.
Click to expand...
Words cannot express how much I agree with that comment, not just for this situation but for many things discussed on this thread prior.
 
Veloxt1r0kore said:
Whatever you all mean, in fact he another bacteria who soon will cause a massive chaos and should be exterminate soon.
Click to expand...
Dude, chill. Being confrontational is not a crime. We're not a bunch of authoritarians. We don't exterminate everything that disagrees with us. Now drop the issue until there's actually an issue to begin with.
 
No, that's indicate Gilga will still continue, yes he doesn't broke any rules from you all views, but if you all ignoring him, sooner he will cause many many problem and BOOM!!
 
We'll ban her as soon as she does cause problems. But she hasn't caused any yet, so this discussion is pointless.
 
Velox. Drop this.

Everyone has already explained why the report isn't action worthy and you being this stubborn in getting Giga punished doesn't help anyone.
 
Veloxt1r0kore said:
No, that's indicate Gilga will still continue, yes he doesn't broke any rules from you all views, but if you all ignoring him, sooner he will cause many many problem and BOOM!!
Click to expand...
Stop being so paranoid. If he actually does something report worthy we will cross that bridge when we come to it, but right now drop this. Saying something is wanked is not report worthy. Now move on before you say anything worse than what you already have.
 
Vel, look at it this way. Someone has just gotten out of jail on parole. The person rudely shoves you out of his way while walking down the street. You react by saying that this is a sign he plans to continue his previous criminal behavior and he should immediately be thrown back in jail. See the issue? That's basically how you're acting here.
 
And? Just because we are member of community doesn't mean we can't ignore something troublesome who already make a trouble in the past.

Anyway i'm done since i already said my thought here.
 
In an argument, wank would be closely associated with Fallacy. Saying someone wanks is similar to calling someone a wanker which is a derogatory term as listed on VS Battles Staff. The word "wank", itself, is a derogatory term: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-spanish/wank

Its definition is closely associated to "bullshit", in our context: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-spanish/bullshit

  • Wanker: A derogatory term used to describe users who inflate character or verse statistics to massive levels over faulty logic or vague evidence. Use of this term is generally frowned upon, but even Staff members have been known to use it when agitated or tired.
 
I think there should be a thread to classify it as a concrete degoratory term.

I get anger and stress but insults are insults and there should be no double-standard when we have this rule.

  • Refrain from spamming, trolling, threatening, using derogatory comments of any form (ethnic, homophobic, belittling the disabled or mentally ill, etcetera), and rude, vulgar, sexist, etcetera offensive language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
30 31 32
Replies
1K
Views
93K
Vzearr
Vzearr
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
A minor addition about discussion rules
Replies
4
Views
750
Deleted member 40688
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
1K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
Mr. Bambu
  • Locked
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
2 3
Replies
80
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top