- 13,509
- 5,665
Reminds me of a guy in a Natsu fight a few months ago. Just argued with dc feats and ignored the resoning of the calcs/site in general.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports - 38
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
- 40,446
- 12,914
Yeah, not Jonathan
- 32,327
- 20,201
I'm reporting KuuIchigo for his actions in the following thread. Yet again he is behaving condescending, ignoring warnings and trying to stir up trouble by bringing up ancient drama back to the surface.
Multiple condescending posts.
He received multiple warnings, both from myself and other staff. His only response to the four warnings of stopping was to go further in the opposite direction by bringing up exaggerated two year old drama.
If it wasn't clear by the two times he's been reported already, or the constant provocations and condescending tone of his posts - particularly against Weekly in threads - KuuIchigo has no intention of changing his behavior nor acting in good faith for the wiki and it's member. I've talked to multiple admins about this and they agree that he deserves a ban. At least temporary.
Multiple condescending posts.
He received multiple warnings, both from myself and other staff. His only response to the four warnings of stopping was to go further in the opposite direction by bringing up exaggerated two year old drama.
If it wasn't clear by the two times he's been reported already, or the constant provocations and condescending tone of his posts - particularly against Weekly in threads - KuuIchigo has no intention of changing his behavior nor acting in good faith for the wiki and it's member. I've talked to multiple admins about this and they agree that he deserves a ban. At least temporary.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Yet again we show everyone how having once had a green name here is enough to require a constant repeat of offenses that'd ban a normal user ten times over. I've said this before regarding Kuu and I'll say it again.
He should definitely be banned.
He should definitely be banned.
- 32,327
- 20,201
If you wish I can give you a list of Staff who think he deserves a ban, because I know some are not available right now.
- 33,405
- 8,416
I agree with Matt and Kepe. Any other user would have long been banned by now. There should be a limit to how much we accept. Even for the likes of former "green names".
- 21,783
- 4,826
Agreed
- 32,327
- 20,201
It could either be temporary or infinite but I strongly doubt he would learn his lessons with a month-long ban.
- 32,327
- 20,201
Infinite. Temporary is only delaying until he does stuff again after being unbanned and gets report a fourth time.
- 12,522
- 3,488
I think an infinite ban is best.
- 11,200
- 12,509
Infinite, obviously. I may not have the greatest grip on the situation, but this sounds like a repeated offender for at least months on end. I've seen people get perma-banned for far less confrontational behavior. Justice should be blind.
- 21,783
- 4,826
Infinite
It seems to me that anything less would just provoke Kuu when he gets back and make the issue worse.
It seems to me that anything less would just provoke Kuu when he gets back and make the issue worse.
- 10,748
- 6,476
I would honestly be fine with a temporary ban. Granted, I am not that knowledgeable on his past offenses and ignoring multiple staff warnings is not a sign of someone willing to adjust his behaviour for the sake of a healthy discussion.
So yeah, infinite ban isn't something I would oppose, but I am more inclined to suggest a temporary ban before banning him from the site for good.
So yeah, infinite ban isn't something I would oppose, but I am more inclined to suggest a temporary ban before banning him from the site for good.
- 15,332
- 7,559
I banned him.
- 32,327
- 20,201
Done and banned and deleted. Moving on.
- 165,044
- 71,886
- Thread starter
- #302
I used the nuke script to automatically delete all of his additions.
If an administrator wants to install it him- or herself, they must send me a PM first though, so I can give them instructions.
If an administrator wants to install it him- or herself, they must send me a PM first though, so I can give them instructions.
- 32,327
- 20,201
This is clearly happening in direct response to KuuIchigo's ban.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Worth noting that, when FANDOM removed the 10 edit block, they also removed the 4 day wait for an account to be usable.
- 8,486
- 8,886
- 200
- 49
- 11,200
- 12,509
- 3,669
- 1,080
- 15,407
- 5,717
Does it really matter who it is? It's just another troll. Trying to attribute it to someone will just give said someone more unneeded attention.
- Status
