- 161
- 79
That just doesn't seem fair to Straika. You guys gave him a warning, and he hasn't acted up since. You should give him a chance.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports - 35
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
- 15,332
- 7,563
Straika also used a heavily modified and memey version of the M-word, suggesting he is just joking.
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,481
- 13,689
@MICKEY Even if Dargoo did temp ban you for using a word prohibited by fandom, and even if that's why everyone else in the thread agreed to ban you, "m-fers" isn't prohibited by fandom.
As far as I can tell, they'd rather people not say that due to the age demographic of the wiki, but it's not one of the three (or is it four?) words that would lead to a permanent fandom block regardless of context. If there's a filter on it here (which I believe there is) that's additional stuff the staff added as a precaution, and because of the demographics of the wiki.
As far as I can tell, they'd rather people not say that due to the age demographic of the wiki, but it's not one of the three (or is it four?) words that would lead to a permanent fandom block regardless of context. If there's a filter on it here (which I believe there is) that's additional stuff the staff added as a precaution, and because of the demographics of the wiki.
- 161
- 79
"Stuff like this is inexcusable, I don't personally give a damn if it was a joke."
- 15,332
- 7,563
The C-word is forbidden by FANDOM bro. They have even come here to say it.
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,481
- 13,689
That doesn't say it's about the specific word, it's probably about you calling another user of a site the c word, then continuing to mock them.MICKEYMOUSEUSERNAME said:
- 161
- 79
That quote, coupled with what Dargoo said to me in chat, says that I was banned because I used a word prohibited by FANDOM.
- 161
- 79
Than why was the plausibility of Straika being banned for using the word "m-fers" even taken into consideration for him being banned as well?Agnaa said:
Sorry, Antvasima, but I needed to bring that up.
- 161
- 79
But if, like you said, using the term "m-fers" isn't even banable, why would Antvasima claim that he would be fine with Straika being banned for that very reason?
- 161
- 79
So you're basically saying that it was because I made it seem like what he said was a banable offense, right? If so, that's not what I'm asking about. If you guys knew that using such language wasn't banable, why even entertain the idea that what he said was banable?
- 15,332
- 7,563
Stop derailing this thread '''now''' and take this to a wall.
- 161
- 79
Okay, but please don't delete our previous comments. I would like somebody to look over my ban and use these for reference.
- 63,529
- 8,506
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2180620#44
Someone really needs to tell Uldmaster to calm down. Even after being told to drop the attitude by both me and Dragon he still acts this way.
Someone really needs to tell Uldmaster to calm down. Even after being told to drop the attitude by both me and Dragon he still acts this way.
- 63,529
- 8,506
Thank you
- 15,637
- 5,392
I have discussed MICKEY"s ban on my wall, and am not convinced they are undeserving of the ban.
Some context:
I banned MICKEY not only because they used the word in question and that was that. I banned them on chat for two weeks as they and another user were jeering a user behind their backs with derogatory language, I was told by said user they had already been on poor terms, and I was informed by an admin that this isn't the first time MICKEY has been warned due to poor conduct and use of language.
I don't see any sense of them owning up to their actions. While I understand they may have issues with how strongly I feel about this, they don't seem to actually care about owning up to their actions and instead desire to tally them up against other rule violations. If they actually apologized for what they did to the user on my wall instead of accusing me of being inconsistent with other staff actions (a claim I was not provided evidence for), I would have been much more open to decreasing or eliminating the ban.
Now I feel it should firmly stay the entire duration.
Some context:
I banned MICKEY not only because they used the word in question and that was that. I banned them on chat for two weeks as they and another user were jeering a user behind their backs with derogatory language, I was told by said user they had already been on poor terms, and I was informed by an admin that this isn't the first time MICKEY has been warned due to poor conduct and use of language.
I don't see any sense of them owning up to their actions. While I understand they may have issues with how strongly I feel about this, they don't seem to actually care about owning up to their actions and instead desire to tally them up against other rule violations. If they actually apologized for what they did to the user on my wall instead of accusing me of being inconsistent with other staff actions (a claim I was not provided evidence for), I would have been much more open to decreasing or eliminating the ban.
Now I feel it should firmly stay the entire duration.
- 12,824
- 3,983
- 12,524
- 3,492
^Certainly looks like a troll.
- 31,371
- 34,117
I closed the thread and give the user a warning, but if he doesn't learn, and Admin or above could ban him.
- 31,701
- 5,478
User:Veloxt1r0kore and User:EMS-TC02 Phantom have had a volatile conversation in chat, and a slur or two was exchanged.
- 39,646
- 15,557
I admit that,that's because i following my angery there so i lost my cool.
- 15,418
- 5,748
Not to be rude Velox, but you "losing your cool" happens way more often than it should.
- 6,104
- 5,106
My advice is take a 15 minute break (suggested by your friendly neighborhood Wal-Mart) to cool off if you're losing said cool, but Saikou has a point. I do understand why, Im just offering the solution since you're not at all volatile on purpose.
- 31,701
- 5,478
- 39,646
- 15,557
You're right,Sora-san.
- 15,332
- 7,563
If Phantom is a black dude the word is very likely not to have the same meaning to him, but...seems like he set it off.
- 40,459
- 12,940
As African Americans, Dragon and I both agree that even as black people, the word shouldn't be used at all here.
Sorry for speaking for you, Dragon.
Sorry for speaking for you, Dragon.
- 597
- 21
"Makes you look like a " hm, isn't that like bannable
- 12,524
- 3,492
Velox, I did tell you you have to be careful of what you say on here. If someone's provoking you, don't respond and just report them.
- 40,459
- 12,940
In the words of Angelica Schuyler in the musical Hamilton...
"You know why Jefferson can do what he wants? He doesn't dignify schoolyard taunts with a response!"
"You know why Jefferson can do what he wants? He doesn't dignify schoolyard taunts with a response!"
- 10,758
- 6,491
What qualifies as "large amount of profanity" exactly? To me at least this seems to be an example.
- Status
Similar threads
