• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports - 30

Status
Not open for further replies.
The resolution of the Imgur images is not high enough for me to read.
 
The zoom doesn't work for me. Perhaps because I use a tablet.
 
I agree, please stop quoting the slurs; especially without putting quotation marks around it. Punctuation does save lives. Also, edit your post if it's the latest post; please don't double/triple post.
 
Yes, he should be unbanned, for now.
 
I unblocked him. Shredder just seems to be a character he likes therefore he named himself after that. No reasonable person would mistake this guy for Matt so there's no harm to his identity. If he actually misbehaves in some way then of course he can be banned but for now I think he should be unbanned.
 
I agree with Medeus. I have full confidence in Soldier Blue.
 
As much as I agree, I wouldn't say "reporting staff members for no reason" isn't allowed, but reporting anyone for no reason isn't allowed. There's already a schism within the community because of "staff superiority" as some like to call it and it is literally believed that staff cannot be reported.
 
Arrogant Schmuck on the other hand does seem more like a legitimate RV. He's already got multiple warnings for creating spite threads or just removing Vs threads that go against his favor. And to make matters worse, he's frequently removed all those warnings from his wall iirc. A ban might be reasonable, but for how long is the question.
 
Veloxt1r0kore said:
Honestly AS is an good guy,he's just bit have aggresive attitude toward's anybody who pissed off him.
You yourself decided to add fuel to the fire by calling out "Wank"

Don't act like you're innocent
 
If many people aren't behaving well in a thread, then close the thread. We never started reporting every single person including staff who got aggressive during those infamous Pokemon or Dragonball revisions. Simply have the threads closed; simplest and most effective solution.
 
Sera Loveheart said:
If many people aren't behaving well in a thread, then close the thread. We never started reporting every single person including staff who got aggressive during those infamous Pokemon or Dragonball revisions. Simply have the threads closed; simplest and most effective solution.
If you're talking about the thread I post above...

I mean, I think it is okay if it's their first time, but...sadly it isn't.
 
Maybe giving AS an explanation warning to stop would be best?
 
I agree with Matthew. We can't go around banning generally well-behaved members for minor issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top