• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Report - VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Matt I think we should just ban him. He shows no intentions of following our rules and proceeds with the AP is greater than hax arguments despite being proven wrong and told to drop the subject. He also continues to derail the thread.
 
I don't think he's broken any actual rules, though. And he is polite, and tries not to make stomp/spite threads. I guess a simple warning can suffice.
 
I already gave him a warning and he seems to have stopped for now so whatever you guys think is the correct course of action go ahead and do
 
He's very new so I don't think an instant ban is a good idea, but if he keeps up even after Weeklys warning, then go for it.
 
A long instant ban is actually our standard praxis for new editors who immediately start to vandalise by inserting extremely exaggerated statistics.

I am giving him a 6 month block.
 
@Ant

Why an instant ban though? People who have no clue about how feats are taken into consideration might start editing one or two pages. I don't feel that it warrants a ban.
 
Because people joining this wiki to instantly vandalise pages must be strongly discouraged from trying to get away with such behaviour, as othervise this wiki would be at risk to have lots of inaccurate and misleading information inserted into the profiles.

This is a very important rule, and not up for discussion.

In addition, regular members should only use this thread to inform the staff about rule-violations, not argue about the verdicts.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Dooyo

Very biased towards NNT and condescending. Constantly tries to downplay Fairy Tail without giving any evidence and is very rude . Dismisses a characters abilities . And continues to quote large blocks of text despite me telling him not to. Obviously has not read the files and when he does he dismisses the stats entirely. He pretty much calls us blind for not seeing Erza's feat as an outlier showing he did not read comments or the upgrade threads.

Overall everything he's done can be viewed

Here:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/588076

Here:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/606982

And his bias here:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/607037
 
It does seem like he is a bit of an ass looking at the links above. You can tell him to tone his behaviour down a bit and see how it goes.

Would like to see the other admins' stance on this however.
 
@Lina

I'll give him a warning. If he continues he's getting a six month ban minimum. He's exceedingly snobby and condescending.
 
Not to pester anyone, but I'd suggest keeping an eye on Plasmapunch101. I understand him creating a DBZ. vs DC. thread may be because he's new, but this is completely different. Commenting "My name is Legion, for we are many" on a random thread is a bit suspicious.
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Tk45

Likely a sockpuppet of https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Dooyo

-Has the same disrespectful and condescending tone.

-Doesn't follow our rules. He ignores statistics and warnings.

-Obviously knows nothing about our system and doesn't care to. He uses his own made up stats.

-New account made today which is not far off from when Dooyo was banned.

-Even quoted Dooyo's argument.

Can all be seen here:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/606982#167
 
I don't think Morkar meant to be rude towards Promenstein, just frustrated. I say this because he's generally polite and nice in the chat. I also believe Ryukama already warned him about his attitude towards Celestial, but I could be wrong.
 
I didn't give Morkar a warning. He was complaining about Celestial Pegasus's behavior regarding some thread, and I was telling him how I don't believe there was anything wrong with how CP was acting.

I do not know much about Morkar or how he acts as a whole though, so other staff are free to handle the situation as they think to be best.
 
TK45 seems like an obvious sockpuppet. Blocked. Morkar's fine.
 
Morkar has had other negative behavior in the past. Asking me to do or in some way pass along a warning to Trexalfa over something they argued about, IIRC, on a different wiki. I personally have spoken with him outside of Wikia, and I believe he is an aquiantace of AMM. However I do not like his behavior, and we should warn him. To note, this thing he asked of me was a month ago, and while I was on my laptop, on which I had no way of taking screenshots, so sorry in advance for burden of proof.
 
From what people said about Morkar, I do not think that he has done anything wrong other than get into some heated debating with Celestial Pegasus. He didn't seem to break any rules however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top