- 31,639
- 34,671
@Jvando seems to be making sense, but so do Damage's points.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think in this case, it's fine, there is no transitional panel and they're both in the same page which contain two panel and without dialogues, it's fine to assume that they're separated by a few second.Damage3245 said:Just because there is cut from Naruto's face to the end result of the CT doesn't mean that the timeframe between the two panels has to be really short.
There doesn't have to be a transitional panel; there is nothing linking them to being a few seconds apart so it is an unwarranted assumption.The Causality said:I think in this case, it's fine, there is no transitional panel and they're both in the same page, it's fine to assume that they're separated by a few second.
You only talked about this panel i guess not the entire chapter, if it's the latter, then we didn't talk about the same things, About the whole Chapter, that's obvious that there is not a few seconds between the formation and the end.Damage3245 said:@BlackeJan; this is a staff-only thread.
@The Causality; look at the formation of the CT over the course of the chapter. You're assuming it jumps from a couple kilometers across to over 3,400 kilometers across in a few seconds just because there was a scene cut to it being formed a panel later? Even though it took multiple panels for it to grow to a couple kilometers across?
I want to say that there is a few seconds between panel only if there is no inconsistency or nothing to contradict it, (like we don't assume few minutes between panel without concrete proof of it), that's the usual assumption, just like we don't assume dynamic action in panel to 10 minutes or stuff like that.Damage3245 said:@The Causlity; the formation of the CT is what I'm talking about as a whole.
But regarding that panel you're talking about specifically, I would say that is a Non-Sequiter fallacy among others. A jump from one panel to another in no way implies a definite timeframe.
You can't point to that page and say that it could only be a few seconds between the panels.
We don't need to make any assumption about the timeframe between panels thanks to the Potential Energy version of the calc.The Causality said:I want to say that there is a few seconds between panel only if there is no inconsistency or nothing to contradict it, (like we don't assume few minutes between panel without concrete proof of it), that's the usual assumption, just like we don't assume dynamic action in panel to 10 minutes or stuff like that.
Only if it's contradicted by the usual assumption or there is an inconstency