- 9,190
- 6,593
That's gravity knuckle. Not a Black Hole.
Oh was the only black whole the GRB feat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's gravity knuckle. Not a Black Hole.
What? You made a downgrade CRT without fully understanding the topic at hand. Why wouldn't someone be irritated?letting Kachon's attuduite get the better of me
Are you saying you made this thread just to try and spite Kachon, without actually knowing what you were talking about?Well, fair enough then from me. I made a mistake of letting Kachon's attuduite get the better of me.
Yeah, though I've seen a lot of arguments that the scan you send is also a Black Hole. I'm neutral towards that.Oh was the only black whole the GRB feat?
uh... i'm disagreeing with the OP, Ziller.here’s an argument buddy
1. A still image where there’s no clear movement is not evidence of light escaping when it can just as easily be argued as light entering, it’s physically impossible to know just based off this one panel alone
2. The light there is quite literally how gamma ray burst look like in real life. If you’ve gotta problem with it then talk to Albert Einstein or something.
3. The “lighting” isn’t even there in the short from farther away, which would be more accurate to a bystander view to begin with.
And bonus
4. Statements of it being a gamma ray burst, it being black, it looking like a hole, and because I said so
Technically if the Black Hole was there for a super short time (under a second or so) then there is a good chance it wouldn't leave permeant damage.There is, while I would question why the planet wasn't further destroyed, its not my issue.
I can do that I guess. Don't know where they would want to talk about it though.He might be learning Black Holes and it'd likely be good if you two spent time discussing things.
I think they were talking about the attitude/remarks they made regarding the responses in this thread rather than the thread itself.Are you saying you made this thread just to try and spite Kachon, without actually knowing what you were talking about?
Gravity Knuckles use hyperspace/subspace gates, not Black Holes. The concepts can be related though.Oh was the only black whole the GRB feat?
Yeah, though I've seen a lot of arguments that the scan you send is also a Black Hole. I'm neutral towards that.
I’m mentally illuh... i'm disagreeing with the OP, Ziller.
If he escaped the black hole, theoretically. But he didn't do that, he just summoned one and survived its effects which wouldn't be related to LS.Wouldn’t that upgrade his LS or something?
Ratio.Well, fair enough then from me. I made a mistake of letting Kachon's attuduite get the better of me.
Context is this thread.I think they were talking about the attitude/remarks they made regarding the responses in this thread rather than the thread itself.
Unless I'm missing context somewhere.
If he escaped the black hole, theoretically. But he didn't do that, he just summoned one and survived its effects which wouldn't be related to LS.
He was able to spread his arms and legs apartalthough he should’ve been crushed being at the epicenter in general.
Simple: Infinite Durability for surviving in the middle of a black hole.
Infinite dura, but only with his belly button.Simple: Infinite Durability for surviving in the middle of a black hole.
bruh momentumSimple: Infinite Durability for surviving in the middle of a black hole.
Ehhhhh. The separation between "resisted the gravitational pull so that he didn't just get ripped apart" and "lifting strength" seems kind of random to me.If he escaped the black hole, theoretically. But he didn't do that, he just summoned one and survived its effects which wouldn't be related to LS.
I mean, fellasSimple: Infinite Durability for surviving in the middle of a black hole.
This is a joke btwI mean, fellas
would it be so wrong….
Also for the record I disagree with the thread lol. It's dumb most avenues you decide to argue it from.
I believe the OP already changed their mind? It would be best not to dogpile here even if that wasn’t the intention…Based off everything, I disagree with OP FRA for now. It's seem to me at least that the manga is trying to represent a legit GRB as much as it can.
That said, I'll also await more input from Firestorm. This is area I'm not crazy familiar with...
Garou can indeed replicate a big bang for 3-AYea, pretty obvious that i disagree with this thread. It's a blatant GRB and Black Hole made by someone who knows all forces in the universe and can create perfect replicas of cosmical events (Which means Low 2-C Garou since he can replicate a big ba-)
Big Bang would be in a smaller scale (in potency). He can replicate the event, not the energy behind it.Garou can indeed replicate a big bang for 3-A
problem is, he kinda lives in the same universe as Tareo so destroying the universe is a no-go, which is why he didn’t do it
but still possible
It can I believe.Either way, is the OP not arguing for this anymore? If so, this can be closed, no?