Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fine, this is betterI think that we settled on using "( (The lower border of the next tier - The upper border of the preceding tier) x 3/4 ) + The upper border of the preceding tier".
Baseline for High 7-A is 1 gigaton, not 775 megatons.That doesn't actually get you 3/4 of the tier.
3/4 of 1000 Megatons is 750 Megatons.
The actual midpoint of between halfway up 7-A and the baseline for High 7-A is 775.
Still, this isn't the number (Or I should say, method) to qualify for upscaling. The correct number would be 3/4 that of the next tier, which is definitely gonna give you the + rating due to it being higher than the arithmetic mean between the lowest and highest bounds of a tier.@KILO506; I didn't say the baseline for High 7-A was 775 Megatons...
I'm lost on what you're talking about.Still, this isn't the number (Or I should say, method) to qualify for upscaling. The correct number would be 3/4 that of the next tier, which is definitely gonna give you the + rating due to it being higher than the arithmetic mean between the lowest and highest bounds of a tier.
Lemme post another example.I'm lost on what you're talking about.
Isn't that what I just posted?
This^@KLOL506; no, because I don't think we're using the 3/4 of 11 tons as the guideline here. We're using 3/4 of the way to the next tier, which in your example would be 8.75 tons.
I didn't say it was a guideline tho. I was merely saying to multiply 3/4 or 0.75 with the highest point of the tier (Which also happens to be the baseline of the next tier, as in, the highest point of a lower tier is the baseline starting point of the next tier, this isn't limited to any tier) to get the value required to upscale to the next tier.This^
There's 3/4 of the way to the next tier and then there's 3/4 of 11 Tons
I don't think an overcomplication like this is required. We already have a + sign that we use like this and that's enough. Not everything has to follow a well-defined rule, and more than half of the people in the thread disagree with having a specific limit, past which characters are free to get upscaled easily. Either don't have upscaling and just rate them as "higher", or allow upscaling on a case-by-case basis but still very strictly. I am not talking about being 1.5x away from the border of the next tier, I personally feel that's quite a large gap more often than not, and even if characters are 0.8 or 0.9x from the border of the next tier, someone oneshotting them shouldn't be loosely considered for upscaling, they should be strictly examined even then.I think that we settled on using "( (The lower border of the next tier - The upper border of the preceding tier) x 3/4 ) + The upper border of the preceding tier".
Either don't have upscaling and just rate them as "higher"
I'm gonna be real here this doesn't seem that bad.Upscaling to me, is as random as seeing someone one-shot a 145 Megaton character and deciding "It makes more sense if we rate them as 160 Megatons. Or 175 Megatons."
Anyway, what about this suggestion regarding the + signs? Is somebody willing to work on that?I think it'd be a good idea to mark that specific value for every tier in our AP chart too, though.
M3X put this list together: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:M3X/SandboxAnyway, what about this suggestion regarding the + signs? Is somebody willing to work on that?
M3X said he had difficulties calculating the values going beyond Planet level so help on that side is appreciated.We preferably need to verify before major changes.
Yes, help is always appreciated.M3X said he had difficulties calculating the values going beyond Planet level so help on that side is appreciated.
Is somebody willing and able to come up with a compromise solution that reasonably satisfies most of us?We're going in circles at this point, nobody can seem to agree on one solution
The 3/4 rule seemed primarily agreed upon until AKM Sama said somethingIs somebody willing and able to come up with a compromise solution that reasonably satisfies most of us?
Doesn’t mean he is right hereThat is true. It seems simple to use to me, but AKM usually knows what he is talking about.