- 1,255
- 855
Soooo, I have been looking over profiles for unreliable regeneration and recently found this
Now I have a few problems with this.
First of all, the scans doesn't say anything about any form of regeneration, healing or restoration. So first I was extremely confused and tried to hit up some Sonic scalers... Was ignored... So instead I hit up one of my friends, and he basically tells me the scans "show" from the orb that is just energy cable of constructing a body.... Yes I mean show not explain... Do I even need to say where the problem lies? And yes, this was all shown, not said...
Either way, I find both the scans and explanation faulty. Now where do i begin...
Problems
What we actually know from the scans presented.
Conclusion
Votes
Agree - @Deagonx (removal), @Mr. Bambu (agree with removal, and think "possible low godly regeneration is fine, but would be a long stretch), @ActuallySpaceMan42,
Disagree - @Maverick_Zero_X
Neutral - @Propellus( seems to be leaning towards agreeing but waiting for more counter arguments), @DarkDragonMedeus(leaning towards agreeing with "possibly low godly",
Note 1, I would love it if we could keep a civilized discussion from both sides. All opinions and arguments counts, but try not to go in circles.
Note 2, I likely won't be able to respond to counter arguments today due to celebrating Midsummer.
Note 3, Will update this CRT as the thread progresses.
Source Chaos Energy page
- Regeneration (Low-Godly): Users imbedded with Chaos Energy can regenerate from their life essence.[8] However, a lack of Chaos Energy would prevent users from regenerating.
Now I have a few problems with this.
First of all, the scans doesn't say anything about any form of regeneration, healing or restoration. So first I was extremely confused and tried to hit up some Sonic scalers... Was ignored... So instead I hit up one of my friends, and he basically tells me the scans "show" from the orb that is just energy cable of constructing a body.... Yes I mean show not explain... Do I even need to say where the problem lies? And yes, this was all shown, not said...
Either way, I find both the scans and explanation faulty. Now where do i begin...
Problems
- First of, we have no mention or clear feats of this regeneration happened. Only a vague picture and a small explation of life essence.
- Let's say this was a regeneration feat, it wouldn't even matter since it is caused by a outside factor (Chaos Energy), making it Healing instead.
- How do we know that it is capable of regenerating from entire physical erasure? Just due to it being a metaphysical cause doesn't mean it can regenerate an entire body, and how do we even know it is metaphysical in the first place? All we see is a yellow ball becoming expanding.
- Also the fact that of branches, of Chaos energy has lower regeneration is already a huge red flag. (A magic type that requires a long time of training with chaos energy according to the page.
What we actually know from the scans presented.
- Life essence is a form of energy.
- The last scan says that they can't retain a physical form without energy (not sure if it's chaos energy or not) and will power.
- We lack feat of actual regeneration, and knowing how much it can regenerate, whether it can regenerate a body from complete erasure or not.
- It is healing and not regeneration. As we can clearly see it is a healing factor caused by a energy.
Conclusion
- Proposal 1, we Just remove this entirely due to being to unreliable to get a actual regeneration rating.
- Proposal 2, The regeneration becomes possibly low godly healing and better phrasing. If so the new description can be discussed in the thread.
- Proposal 3, We find a appropriate replacement for the healing feat tier.
Votes
Agree - @Deagonx (removal), @Mr. Bambu (agree with removal, and think "possible low godly regeneration is fine, but would be a long stretch), @ActuallySpaceMan42,
Disagree - @Maverick_Zero_X
Neutral - @Propellus( seems to be leaning towards agreeing but waiting for more counter arguments), @DarkDragonMedeus(leaning towards agreeing with "possibly low godly",
Note 1, I would love it if we could keep a civilized discussion from both sides. All opinions and arguments counts, but try not to go in circles.
Note 2, I likely won't be able to respond to counter arguments today due to celebrating Midsummer.
Note 3, Will update this CRT as the thread progresses.
Last edited: