- 12,852
- 2,610
Alright so cal did the superman throwing a compressed solar system calculation his result
5.6548526984352e+46 joules (High end)
Yet in the comment section Dark anine thought, it would be more accurate to use radian then convert it to degree. Here is her calculation
2atan(tan(70/2)*(74/444)) = 0.157611155738 Radians
0.157611155738├ù180┬░/¤Ç = 9.030454028┬░ Degrees
So Distance: 8.8098e+9 Meters
8.8098e+9 Meters / 1 minute = 146,829,999.9998661 m/s
For Relativistic Kinetic Energy, just use this calculator
The result is 2.627E+46 J. 262.7 FOE
With the new values, the high end would be FTL KE, and that's no good.
So lets do the mid end instead.
8.8098e+9 Meters / 30 seconds = 293,660,000 m/s. That's 0.97c. I think theirs a limit to the speed in which Relativistic KE ca go, and I think that's past it, but lets do it just in case.
That result is 6.963E+47 J. 6.9 KiloFoe.
Now here is Matts
Assuming that star was 100 meters in diameter when compressed, and had the same mass of our sun:
GBE = 3GM┬▓/5r
GBE = 3 * 6.67408e-11 * 1.9891e30 kilograms┬▓ / 5 * 50 meters
GBE = 7.9218369e50 / 250
GBE = 3.16873476e48 joules
Is there anything wrong with matts? Would dark calculation be considered more accurate then cals and be better to use. If something is wrong with Matts calculation.
5.6548526984352e+46 joules (High end)
Yet in the comment section Dark anine thought, it would be more accurate to use radian then convert it to degree. Here is her calculation
2atan(tan(70/2)*(74/444)) = 0.157611155738 Radians
0.157611155738├ù180┬░/¤Ç = 9.030454028┬░ Degrees
So Distance: 8.8098e+9 Meters
8.8098e+9 Meters / 1 minute = 146,829,999.9998661 m/s
For Relativistic Kinetic Energy, just use this calculator
The result is 2.627E+46 J. 262.7 FOE
With the new values, the high end would be FTL KE, and that's no good.
So lets do the mid end instead.
8.8098e+9 Meters / 30 seconds = 293,660,000 m/s. That's 0.97c. I think theirs a limit to the speed in which Relativistic KE ca go, and I think that's past it, but lets do it just in case.
That result is 6.963E+47 J. 6.9 KiloFoe.
Now here is Matts
Assuming that star was 100 meters in diameter when compressed, and had the same mass of our sun:
GBE = 3GM┬▓/5r
GBE = 3 * 6.67408e-11 * 1.9891e30 kilograms┬▓ / 5 * 50 meters
GBE = 7.9218369e50 / 250
GBE = 3.16873476e48 joules
Is there anything wrong with matts? Would dark calculation be considered more accurate then cals and be better to use. If something is wrong with Matts calculation.