Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They might just form a "ring" (or some other closed system) of Universes, with a finite amount.Udlmaster said:I've never understood this.
Since there's always going to be an infinite amount of these, wouldn't it just be 2-A?
The argument for it is that they're branching, but, by the fact they already exist and have already branched out, it's already infinite, so why is this 2-B?
No, I cannot prove that.NoUdlmaster said:Well, can you prove that?
Because otherwise it's speculation, and since we've been given no reason to speculate that they're the same Universes connected to each other, we'd have to assume they're all different.
We've also been given no reason to assume that they're all different. If you wanna bring up occam's razor, it's a much smaller assumption to say that they link to each other instead of an infinite amount.Udlmaster said:Well, can you prove that?
Because otherwise it's speculation, and since we've been given no reason to speculate that they're the same Universes connected to each other, we'd have to assume they're all different.
Actually, no, it's a much bigger assumption to say that they're all the same Universes in a closed system instread of them being branching Universes.RotofBots said:We've also been given no reason to assume that they're all different. If you wanna bring up occam's razor, it's a much smaller assumption to say that they link to each other instead of an infinite amount.
If the only thing we've seen is that there's a Universe per mirror reflection, isn't the first assumption that there is a Universe per mirror reflection?Udlmaster said:The only thing we've seen is that there's a Universe per mirror reflection, therefore, the first assumption is there's an infinite set of these.
Yes, the Universes are infinite in size.Xerkser500 said:Just to add in a bone from watching some other threads, didnt someone mention something about the universes in Pokemon being infinite in size? Not amount but as in the size of each universe.
Doesn't Arceus have a bit of Dialga's time manipulation powers, at least? I mean, Arceus DID create Dialga along with the other two dragons.The real cal howard said:If Arceus wound up a 2-A, I could make an argument of him being the strongest non infinite 2-A if I bullshitted enough (like if I said each game had infinite universes), and Arceus does have better hax, but well...Sonic kinda has that AP advantage if I don't bs and it's effective and it makes it a stomp.
(Dialga on the other hand instantly timestops and wins ovo)
That said, Arceus and the trio should be Type 2 abstracts for sure.
If those reflections are:PaChi2 said:If we put three mirrors from that cage together we could get infinite reflections and that way infinite worlds.
(thinks)
Unfortunately, the bad one. Because people like to be complicated.ShadowWarrior1999 said:What kind of conceptual manipulation does Arceus even have anyways, 3 or 2?
Godoka and Homucifer are too abstract for Arceus. Arceus beats Homu's mindhax easy (three layers of broken 4-D mindhax resistance), but abstraction makes that a problem.Dragopentling said:By all means, I wished Arceus was 2-A, too, just so we can have Llama God vs Goddoka OR her Satan friend.
BUT, Arceus's feats are high in the 2-B range at best.
Ha, a hax Sonic has that is better than Arceus.The real cal howard said:Unfortunately, the bad one. Because people like to be complicated.ShadowWarrior1999 said:What kind of conceptual manipulation does Arceus even have anyways, 3 or 2?
Which im also pretty sure would be the case with Reflection Cave.Udlmaster said:If those reflections are:
1. Universes
2. Different
Then yes, it would be infinite worlds.