- 7,142
- 4,658
I sort of have an opinion on this, but I'd rather hear the opinions of other Staff knowledgeable on the topic first before I give a firm response.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think you could also call those 3 staff members who are knowledgeable about the concepts.Okay. No problem.
yepI think you could also call those 3 staff members who are knowledgeable about the concepts.
Thanx for sharing your opinion.My opinion is the same.
More staff opinion is needed. This is standard practise.I personally think this CRT has gone on long enough.
The current votes are 15 in agreement, 1 in disagreement, and 1 staff member in neutral, tho they are leaning towards agreement.
We can wait one more day for extra input, but if there are no more disagreements + valid reasons by then, then this upgrade should be applied.
A downgrade CRT can always be created at a later time if needed.
I said we can wait one more day for extra input, but since I wasn't clear enough, I specifically meant staff input, as that's basically the only thing we've been waiting for for the past few days.More staff opinion is needed. This is standard practise.
It is unfair to subvert standard practise. Go out and invite staff to this, because one neutral staff doesn't mean this will go through.I said we can wait one more day for extra input, but since it wasn't clear enough, I specifically meant staff input, as that's basically the only thing we've been waiting for for the past few days.
In any case, the votes are still 15:1:1 in favour of agreement.
It is unfair of us to expect staff members who are not knowledgeable on either the verse, or concepts, or both, to give an opinion here, but it's also unfair to delay a thread for this amount of time just because more staff have not given input here, even though the votes are heavily in favour of agreement.
Hey Dude, now that you are here... You still disagree with the upgrade? since all arguments against it were debunked and literally those against it agreed with type 1 now.It is unfair to subvert standard practise. Go out and invite staff to this, because one neutral staff doesn't mean this will go through.
Actually, did u disagreed? due which reasons? and Yuri said that he was Neutral, leading toward agreementIt is unfair to subvert standard practise. Go out and invite staff to this, because one neutral staff doesn't mean this will go through.
He no longer has reason to disagree, since all his points were completely debunked, since it seems that if he were still against it, he would simply have to bring new evidence to make a counter to the upgrade, which he has not done.Actually, did u disagreed? due which reasons? and Yuri said that he was Neutral, leading toward agreement
You can read the first page, he practically couldn't debunk anything from the Op, and just recycled arguments that made no sense at all, then ImZer0Null got bored and decided to put him in Disagree.I dont even know the reasons that he disagrees, perhaps he should tell them and we could clarify it to him
Which reasoning? can u bring the argument again? I'm too lazy to search itI stick by my same reasoning
All in the first page, not too far down.Cool, let's see, give me the evidence of why you disagree.
All in the first page, not too far down.
Oh, and nothing that was previously debunked, nor recycled arguments please.
Cut the snark. Your not helping your side at all here.hahahaha, how funny, perfect, go read the thread again, it's good that you still disagree after you have no evidence to refute the upgrade, I'll try it in another thread later.
This doesn't help to counter my points, or help my side at all. I am currently reading through it, so cut it down.Oh come on, look who says so, you that on a mere whim that you have no evidence to be against Op, plus all your points are meaningless and have been debunked, but you don't prove anything to back up your pre-debunked points, so what do we do?
Already have, which I stick by. Nothing further needs to be said on my points until staff can evaluate this.All of this can be ended by simply giving me your points against the Op, but it seems to be difficult, since you cannot refute the Op.
I'll wait thenThis doesn't help to counter my points, or help my side at all. I am currently reading through it, so cut it down.
How does it doesnt? Nousgalia Order is not affected by others orders being affected/destroyed, however, if Nousgalia order is destroyed, all others orders are gone due itAfter re-reading the OP and the arguments presented, i'll stick by my original claim, as there is no concrete and direct evidence that HFG (HGF?) meets the first part of CM Type 1
No bernk, let's wait one more week until the staff responds and gives their POV about this thread, I don't think it makes sense to keep arguing since we won't get anywhere.How does it doesnt? Nousgalia Order is not affected by others orders being affected/destroyed, however, if Nousgalia order is destroyed, all others orders are gone due it
That's the second part.How does it doesnt? Nousgalia Order is not affected by others orders being affected/destroyed, however, if Nousgalia order is destroyed, all others orders are gone due it