-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Possible Tier 4 and MFTL+ Kirito (CONCLUDED)
- Thread starter Ywlrvl
- Start date
-
- Tags
- kirito sword art online
- 1,164
- 163
- Thread starter
- #164
Possibly? They stated it wasn't just a void covering earth, but an actual night sky.
"RELEASE RECOLLECTION!!"
Pure white and pitch black discharged at the same time.
Massive numbers of ice tendrils exploded from the front-facing Blue Rose Sword, tightly binding Gabriel's body.
Then from the Night Sky Sword raised high above— A monumental, dark pillar towered into the sky.
Dark light roared upwards, boring through the crimson and gaining soaring altitude — then spreading in all directions almost as if it had collided violently with the sun.
Bit by bit, it was covering the sky.
The crimson was being painted over at terrific speed and the daytime light vanished.
Darkness reached the horizon at once, and continued to expand beyond.
No, it wasn't the darkness of a void. It was velvety, had a slight temperature...
An infinite night sky.
"RELEASE RECOLLECTION!!"
Pure white and pitch black discharged at the same time.
Massive numbers of ice tendrils exploded from the front-facing Blue Rose Sword, tightly binding Gabriel's body.
Then from the Night Sky Sword raised high above— A monumental, dark pillar towered into the sky.
Dark light roared upwards, boring through the crimson and gaining soaring altitude — then spreading in all directions almost as if it had collided violently with the sun.
Bit by bit, it was covering the sky.
The crimson was being painted over at terrific speed and the daytime light vanished.
Darkness reached the horizon at once, and continued to expand beyond.
No, it wasn't the darkness of a void. It was velvety, had a slight temperature...
An infinite night sky.
- 4,333
- 291
How far into 4-B?DMUA said:
- 1,164
- 163
- Thread starter
- #168
This scan furthur proves that it was probably an actual night sky.
A torrent of darkness was ascending from the pitch-dark
longsword raised high in the swordsman's right hand, covering
the entire world.
But it was not a darkness without light.
The northern sky began to shimmer with countless dots of light.
Clusters of stars shining many different colors gradually adorned
the sky... the night.
A torrent of darkness was ascending from the pitch-dark
longsword raised high in the swordsman's right hand, covering
the entire world.
But it was not a darkness without light.
The northern sky began to shimmer with countless dots of light.
Clusters of stars shining many different colors gradually adorned
the sky... the night.
- 1,164
- 163
- Thread starter
- #170
I dunno. You can always ask ol' google.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/11/how-many-stars-are-there-in-the-sky/281641/
Apparently the naked eye can see 5,000 stars at night in one spot.
...But considering the entire planet could see it, that's probably not gonna help a lot.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/11/how-many-stars-are-there-in-the-sky/281641/
Apparently the naked eye can see 5,000 stars at night in one spot.
...But considering the entire planet could see it, that's probably not gonna help a lot.
- 32,359
- 20,298
Changing the night sky doesn't require you to actually manipulate all the stars. Just the atmosphere / planet itsef.
- 24,967
- 6,283
Right, just looked it up via the internet
"There are only about 5,000 stars visible to the naked, average, human eye, MinutePhysics points out. And, because the Earth itself gets in the way, you can only see about a half of those from where you stand."
of course another source says "To answer the question, "How many stars in the sky?" The total comes to 9,096 stars visible across the entire sky."
Considering the former is 2013 and the latter is 2014, I'll go with that number.
9,096 times GBE of 1.517x10^41 is
1.3798632e+45 Joules, 13.798632 FOE, Large Star level, I believe +
"There are only about 5,000 stars visible to the naked, average, human eye, MinutePhysics points out. And, because the Earth itself gets in the way, you can only see about a half of those from where you stand."
of course another source says "To answer the question, "How many stars in the sky?" The total comes to 9,096 stars visible across the entire sky."
Considering the former is 2013 and the latter is 2014, I'll go with that number.
9,096 times GBE of 1.517x10^41 is
1.3798632e+45 Joules, 13.798632 FOE, Large Star level, I believe +
- 1,673
- 289
Yeah, that's another thing. You'd mostly just need to block out the sun's light which is only like, Tier 7.
Moving a nightsky's worth of stars should be High 4-C though.
That's something that legitimately could be used to downplay any destructive feats in astronomical scale when planets/stars are just shown to vanish without a trace rather than destroyed normally.
Moving a nightsky's worth of stars should be High 4-C though.
That's something that legitimately could be used to downplay any destructive feats in astronomical scale when planets/stars are just shown to vanish without a trace rather than destroyed normally.
- 2,047
- 778
I agree with Matthew, 4-A and FTL sounds like a textbook definition of an outlier.
- 1,164
- 163
- Thread starter
- #180
Did you even bother to read the entire thread?Rin The Dragon Empress said:
There are multiple possible 5-A to 4-A feats.
MFTL+ should be solid. It was already shown 10+ times consistently, and by 8 different characters.
Don't forget Underworld during SK Kirito's time is an interstellar, space-faring civilization.
- 1,673
- 289
That requires the assumption the character who performed the feat has light manipulation.
It could be more "reasonable", thing is you'll seldom see this logic applied evenly across the board. And when taken to its logical conclusion it only serves to put holes in the interpretation certain visual cues.
ie: Who is to say stars seen inside dimensions that were created are actually stars and not just an illusion created via light manip? If planets just vanish without leaving any trace, shouldn't it be far more reasonable to assume only the light they reflect was erased instead? and so on.
It could be more "reasonable", thing is you'll seldom see this logic applied evenly across the board. And when taken to its logical conclusion it only serves to put holes in the interpretation certain visual cues.
ie: Who is to say stars seen inside dimensions that were created are actually stars and not just an illusion created via light manip? If planets just vanish without leaving any trace, shouldn't it be far more reasonable to assume only the light they reflect was erased instead? and so on.
- 16,606
- 1,791
Wait, is this happening? Lol
- 10,687
- 6,336
I can agree with At least High 4-C.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Moving stars isn't GBE, though. That's creating them.
Moving stars should be the rotational KE of the star multiplied by the number of them.
Moving stars should be the rotational KE of the star multiplied by the number of them.
- 10,687
- 6,336
The speed calc is pretty weird but using a simple method (I.E just googling 4.367 light years / 10 minutes) I get the same results so I'm okay with the speed myself.
- 10,687
- 6,336
Our rule has always been if a celestial object goes FTL, then we use its GBE instead. No need to complicate everything.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Except I'm talking about rotational kinetic energy. Not kinetic energy.
And link for that? I'm pretty sure we only use GBE if a constllation is created.
And link for that? I'm pretty sure we only use GBE if a constllation is created.
Similar threads
