Except it wasn't. It quite literally wasn't anywhere near those nebulae. It was lightyears and lightyears away from them. Like what in the actual **** are you arguing?
Except no? You're literally just saying stuff like "it would have to be this in order for this to happen or be seen", when no, that wouldn't be the case, at all. "Showing the entire moon and having it zoomed in", is a contradictory statement. Dodging your point? I honestly have no clue what you're arguing because your points make no sense or arent even real points.
You're literally wrong.
we see landmasses in the zoomed in earth shots, your scan just happens to be awful and the grays arent properly pronounced, you can see them better in the other scan though. Regardless, literally wrong, we do see landmasses in the earth shot.
I'm going to say pay attention to the panels you're actually arguing.
Yes, a celestial object, stripped of any and all detail, with debris gravitating around it. You're assuming that the debris were launched 380000km and all just so happened to be hovering around the moon that's drawn at the same angle as the earth previously was mind you, despite not being drawn as the moon at all, opposed to it being the earth stripped of its surface. Occam's razer is the what requires the least amount of assumptions here.
And yet it doesnt. Pretty straightforward.
You are though, because if that IS THE MOON in that panel, then all the debris moved almost 380000km, as the debris in that panel are less then 400km away from the moon.
Except that "distance" is only like 100km (turns out a little less than 400, albeit the that's from the pov, not from the debris, which are even closer to it), so 379900km.
It's not interpreting what you're saying wrong though, it's the fact what you're saying is a complete nonargument.
Anyway, lucky for me, KLOL already did some scaling. Using that as a base.
Object in pixels = 519px (Moon chunk).
Screen height = 316px
Object size = 911.5823053589484281057
911.5823053589484281057*316/(519*2*tan(70deg/2)) = 396.331721534km from moon.
So yes, you're arguing that the debris ended up not even 400km away from the moon, of the 380000km, except it's even less because that's the distance of the moon from the POV, in which the debris can be seen like half that distance if not less closer to the moon.