OUTDATED VERSES, UNTRANSLATED VERSES, VERSES WITHOUT ACTIVE SUPPORTERS E.T.C.

[PrinceofPein]

As the Topic said, this thread is about verses(Books, Anime, Light novel e.t.c.) that are:
1. Outdated or lacking valid information
2. The majority of it is Untranslated (Accuracy cant be guaranteed)
3. The verse no longer has active supporters/experts (So it can be wanked or lowballed without anyone knowing)
4. Verses that are too Disorganized and a mess.
If there are other reasons that you think i should add, please point that out.
Verses that check out the above points should be nuked for obvious reasons. (All verses that would be deleted will be backed up to a blog so it can be revived later on if things changes for the verse i guess)

And i dont think a verse should be deleted just cause it checked just one of this, verses should check at least two of this points before it should be brought up for deletion, so please if you have such verses that you think check this out please point them out in this thread so it can be discussed if it should be nuked or not. these are some of the verses that was mentioned to be nuked
1. Shinza verse (What brought about this thread https://vsbattles.com/threads/last-thread-shinza-shit.120557/) (2, 3 and 4)
2. Senshikan (1,2 and 3)
3. Akame ga kill (1 and 4)
4. Silverio (Ticks everything)
5. Sentouin Hakenshimasu (1,3 and 4)
6. Tales of Demons and Gods (1,3 and 4)
7 Red vs Blue (1, 3 and 4)
8. infinity Stratos (1, 3 and 4)

 

[Delta333]

9 - Nine

Why this verse need to be deleted?It has translation and supporter is still active in this wiki

 

[Sir_Ovens]

We actually had a verse auditing group that went over dead verses and audited them. However the project had long since died out, and we would probably need to revive it again.

 

[Ovy7]

3. I/O

We actually just had a revision thread for it not too long ago.

 

[Popted2]

Akame Ga kill
the profiles are outdated and miss many abilities

Sentouin Hakenshimasu

lacks supporters and needs some crts about the profiles and tiers

Red vs Blue
profiles outdated and very incompleted, lakcs supporters

 

[PrinceofPein]

Why this verse need to be deleted?It has translation and supporter is still active in this wiki

was what i was told, a single supporter too, its hard to know if it is wanked or not. but you are right it only checks one box, so it cant be nuked i will remove it

 

[PrinceofPein]

We actually had a verse auditing group that went over dead verses and audited them. However the project had long since died out, and we would probably need to revive it again.

i think another one should be created, this can be it tho

We actually just had a revision thread for it not too long ago.

noted

 

[Popted2]

wait a minute wait

actually Akame ga kill has supporters and they are not that outdated ts just that miss some powers

and sentouin just needs more supportes but he has that so if you just remove it please?

for red vs blue there is nothing i can do supporters are missing and ect if someone is active please tell me

 

[PrinceofPein]

wait a minute wait

actually Akame ga kill has supporters and they are not that outdated ts just that miss some powers

i agree with this, i am currently reading the manga of akame ga kill and was going to make a revision for it later on

and sentouin just needs more supportes but he has that so if you just remove it please?

sure, i can not even find the verse on wiki i think it has been nuked or it has another name

for red vs blue there is nothing i can do supporters are missing and ect if someone is active please tell me

noted

 

[Popted2]

i agree with this, i am currently reading the manga of akame ga kill and was going to make a revision for it later on

sure, i can not even find the verse on wiki i think it has been nuked or it has another name

noted

about Sentouin I mean remove from the panel thread not remove the verse
also is in the Akatsukiverse with Konosuba

 

[Popted2]

about Sentouin I mean remove from the panel thread not remove the verse
also is in the Akatsukiverse with Konosuba

so if you wanna read it/ see the anime and became a supporter/knowlegdble you do me a favor

 

[Kisaragi_Megumi]

Infinity Stratos comes to my mind

 

[PrinceofPein]

about Sentouin I mean remove from the panel thread not remove the verse
also is in the Akatsukiverse with Konosuba

so if you wanna read it/ see the anime and became a supporter/knowlegdble you do me a favor

oh i thought konosuba has a lot of supporters that are still active?
so i guess it can be removed from the list

 

[Shyouu]

We actually just had a revision thread for it not too long ago.

what was the thread about? I personally think I/O should get removed or get listed at least; due to how it fits 2 of the criteria.

 

[Ovy7]

what was the thread about?

The thread was about revising the tiering of the characters, as they weren't revised at all since the Tiering System change.

I personally think I/O should get removed or get listed at least; due to how it fits 2 of the criteria.

What criteria exactly?

 

[Shyouu]

The thread was about revising the tiering of the characters, as they weren't revised at all since the Tiering System change.

Was the CRT implemented yet?

What criteria exactly?

1. Outdated

3. The verse no longer has active supporters/experts

 

[Antvasima]

As I said in the other thread, I think that it would set a very bad precedent for the wiki if we start to systematically wipe out all of our verses without active supporters simply due to that the favourite verse of some members was downgraded. It is not a realistic option. We would have to regularly waste time on wiping out thousands of pages with solid work behind them.

 

[PrinceofPein]

As I said in the other thread, I think that it would set a very bad precedent for the wiki if we start to systematically wipe out all of our verses without active supporters simply due to that the favourite verse of some members was downgraded. It is not a realistic option. We would have to regularly waste time on wiping out thousands of pages with solid work behind them.

i think it is not just verses without supporters, but these four things

1. Outdated or lacking valid information
2. The majority of it is Untranslated (Accuracy cant be guaranteed)
3. The verse no longer has active supporters/experts (So it can be wanked or lowballed without anyone knowing)
4. Verses that are too Disorganized and a mess.
If there are other reasons that you think i should add, please point that out

And i dont think a verse should be deleted just cause it checked just one of this, verses should check at least two of this points

 

[Antvasima]

#1 can be hard to determine properly.

#2 depends on if we have sufficient available explanations and/or calculations.

#3 is not particularly meaningful in itself.

#4 is far more relevant.

All points in combination make deletions far more warranted though, yes.

 

[PrinceofPein]

#1 can be hard to determine properly.

#2 depends on if we have sufficient available explanations and/or calculations.

#3 is not particularly meaningful in itself.

#4 is far more relevant.

All points in combination make deletions far more warranted though, yes.

well instead of two it can be that verses that check at three should be deleted.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, verses that have serious problems in all 4 areas should probably likely be seriously considered for deletion at least.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Red VS Blue has Weekly Battles and Bambu, so the verse should stay

#3 is not particularly meaningful in itself.

Disagree, if a verse has zero active supporters, then we have no reliable source for information besides what is on the pages themselves (Which the pages can be inaccurate)

 

[Antvasima]

As long as the profile pages and the calculations and other information that they link to is elaborate enough to warrant the tiers, it should usually be fine.

 

[Ovy7]

Was the CRT implemented yet?

It was accepted, but needs someone to do the changes.

1. Outdated

That's what the revision was for.

3. The verse no longer has active supporters/experts

It does tho.

 

[DemonGodMitchAubin]

I guess I can agree with the logic, verses that are extremely outdated and have no one working on them should be deleted yeah

 

[Cosmic_King_of_SAO]

Will this thread be a long term thing?

If so, it would be preferable to move it to the wiki management section and should probably be treated the same as the profile deletion request thread since we'd be deleting an entire verse.

If not and that this can be finished rather quickly then I have nothing else to say.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Akame Ga kill
the profiles are outdated and miss many abilities

Red vs Blue
profiles outdated and very incompleted, lakcs supporters

Both of these are on my list and RVB has an ongoing crt at the moment

 

[Popted2]

Both of these are on my list and RVB has an ongoing crt at the moment

for real that is really good

i can't wait to utilize rvb characters

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Jujutsu Kaisen? Idk. Many people have read the manga, but only 3-4 people are willing to work with the verse

Nah, that should be enough.

Plus, Jujutsu Kaisen is accessible enough for any staff to pick it up and read it if they need to.

 

[Antvasima]

Will this thread be a long term thing?

If so, it would be preferable to move it to the wiki management section and should probably be treated the same as the profile deletion request thread since we'd be deleting an entire verse.

If not and that this can be finished rather quickly then I have nothing else to say.

I am honestly not sure. We can obviously not go on a widespread deletion spree as soon as a verse lacks active supporters, but verses that also lack any valid justifications and explanations for their statistics likely have to be removed, yes.

It would be better with a first post of the thread that better explains that to avoid misunderstandings.

 

[Rez]

Ra from lessa probably should have his page deleted his is the only page from lessa on this wiki the page is definitely a bit accurate though but is probably lacking a few powers

 

[Antvasima]

I think that we would likely need a new thread that is better organised from the start, but honestly, we already have a wiki management forum thread for deleting very unreliable pages. Isn't it better to continue to use that instead?

 

[Bobsican]

Considering how a good chunk of the users already follow that, and how making two threads for similar topics would just cause attention and input issues, I think just sticking to the Profile Deletions Request thread for this kind of stuff as well is fine, it has also been done before on this regard over there after all

 

[LIFE_OF_KING]

Jujutsu Kaisen? Idk. Many people have read the manga, but only 3-4 people are willing to work with the verse

DAMN, I THOUGHT THIS WAS "FUN AND GAMES". IGNORE WHAT I SAID, DON'T DELETE JUJUTSU FROM THE WIKI, THERE IS A SPEED REVISION LITERALLY READY although I still need my computer to post

 

[Antvasima]

Considering how a good chunk of the users already follow that, and how making two threads for similar topics would just cause attention and input issues, I think just sticking to the Profile Deletions Request thread for this kind of stuff as well is fine, it has also been done before on this regard over there after all

Agreed.

Should I close this thread then?

 

[Bobsican]

Yes, although I'll also remind to bring back the audit plans in the future, they have gone in hiatus for years and help on this sort of issues.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, that is not really up to me, but you can talk with audit group members about if they want to revive the project.

I do not remember who they are anymore though.

 

[Bobsican]

Well, that is not really up to me, but you can talk with audit group members about if they want to revive the project.

I do not remember who they are anymore though.

They had an entire Discord server, and whenever I try to ping everyone over there I'm ignored, perhaps it requires the staff being called over it once more, but that's for another thread.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, you can send a PM here instead.

Should I close this thread?

 

[Bobsican]

Go ahead.