- 13,903
- 5,405
Atomic’s durability should just be 7-B via his sword, but unknown physically
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I guess its fair to say he is referring to a large amount of clones as individual ones are 10-C as stated by BS himselfBlack Sperm, who scales to Iaian. But the statement from Gyoro didn't specify an exact amount of clones, or anything.
The suirs were on their white "base" form and G5 seems to have easily defeated them offscreenWe don't actually know if the suits were even active. Considering that they're on nearly par with Pig God, I doubt it.
Well his other feats are being called "strong" by Child Emperor who purposefully avoided him + his core enduring an attack from Atomic SamuraiThe white shit just means they weren't using the absolute full strength of the suit. We don't know much beyond that.
But, Genos scales to Gums, whom Pig God somewhat downscales from. So, Pig God should be able to roast G5.
Well he did cut Jet Psykos with a fully powered Beeline Slash but he didn't make such effort against her laser beamsAtomic slaughtered Jet Psykos. There's no way he was full power there.
Well assuming this goes through and Atomic Samurai AP with his sword is "At least 7-B" then G5 core dura is 7-B as well which means that MA Arc Genos striking strength gets upgraded to 7-B for destroying G5's core with a stomp.True.
The same Jet Psykos required Genos' continuous core beam to pierce the top layer of skin. And Psykos' beams are able to clash with DK's beams, which burned sections of her body.
You need to leave at least 24 hours since the last post before you bump a thread.... Why would you bump after less than 2 hours?Bump?
Sorry, haven't forgotten but been a bit swamped with things after my holiday.Waiting for your evaluation here
I thought we went over it and concluded it needed re-calcing. The measurements for the crater are wrong.Didn’t we already go over that and confirm the current calc was ok?
Fair enough. The calc I will make will have multiple ends for it, for a few different options. I will bring them up for discussion here once it is ready.We didn't come to any conclusions in that thread. We shut down the discussion entirely.
Totally understandable. I was a bit distracted with some One Piece revisions yesterday, but will have the calc for this up today.I don't wanna be annoying about this but I also don't want this CRT to take nearly a month to complete like the other one.
Calc is done now, I've just got to get it evaluated.Okay, hopefully it isn't a big downgrade.
I don't agree with either of your methods. We agreed in this CRT that Beefcake's sizes are too inconsistent to be used.Calc is done now, I've just got to get it evaluated.
This isn't the place to debate which calc is better, we can do that in a Calc Group thread.I don't agree with either of your methods. We agreed in this CRT that Beefcake's sizes are too inconsistent to be used.
In both of your versions in your blog, you use Beefcake to find the volume of the cater. Due to Beefcake's sizes being vastly different in different panels and shots, how do we know that his hand is the same size in the first panel you used to pixel scale as it was in the second one?
Thus, I think that my calc should remain, although my crater pixel scaling does need to be fixed.
No, we're not just going to apply the revision without sorting out the calc issues first.In that case, we should be able to apply the 7-B scaling since apparently the calc will be handled separately
No further delays needed.