- 21,516
- 30,871
- Thread starter
- #241
"The lightest rock" come on now
We shouldn't have to lowball it. There's barely anything against it
We shouldn't have to lowball it. There's barely anything against it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This question deals more with the composition of the planet rather than strictly it’s size.Like, if One Piece's world was sun sized or larger then you could easily just point out how it'd collapse in on itself.
I’m more so saying, even using the least dense rock still nets larger than earth gravity."The lightest rock" come on now
We shouldn't have to lowball it. There's barely anything against it
Doesn't the atmosphere's issues also correlate with gravity?
I’ll get back to you with this.Doesn't the atmosphere's issues also correlate with gravity?
Not at all. OP's atmosphere isn't scientifically accurate either, so it's not a good argumentDoesn't the atmosphere's issues also correlate with gravity?
We not ignoring thisDon't forget that regullar compass wouldn't work on One Piece planet.
That's been accepted. The size is what needs to be determined. This one seems the safest to useAight, how about we save it for later?
Does everyone agree that the planet is bigger than ours?
I would agree that one is the safest so far at least.That's been accepted. The size is what needs to be determined. This one seems the safest to use
![]()
Long River Calcs My Planet
vsbattles.fandom.com
Still bigger than JupiterThat's been accepted. The size is what needs to be determined. This one seems the safest to use
![]()
Long River Calcs My Planet
vsbattles.fandom.com
That's been accepted. The size is what needs to be determined. This one seems the safest to use
![]()
Long River Calcs My Planet
vsbattles.fandom.com
Shouldn't a new thread in the calc group discussion be created so CGMs can discuss which calc is the safest.I would agree that one is the safest so far at least.
I'd like to mention that by this logic we wouldn't use calculations at all as they rely on authors being aware of several kinetic/physical semantics, yet we assume so for the sake of having nearly anything whatsoever measurable for our purposes.There's arguments for both higher gravity and not.
- It's a fictional universe. It can have regular earth gravity and reasonable density as well because it's fictional and doesn't NEED to make sense, as many other cases in other media.
OR
- It DOES have gravity to match its mass, but it doesn't effect the inhabitants of the world because it's a verse where humans don't get turned to soup when getting shot into the sky by a knock up stream.
While I absolutely agree with the bigger size I'm always in favor of suspension of disbelief, because exmaning fiction with logic shouldn't be done unless the author specifically tries to apply said logic to a tee.
^^^^Shouldn't a new thread in the calc group discussion be created so CGMs can discuss which calc is the safest.
Since this thread's purpose has been fulfilled, it wouldn't be a stretch to close it.
Entirely different things to compare. Feats have visual evidence behind them at least. And if not, we do go by statements attached to feats at times as well.I'd like to mention that by this logic we wouldn't use calculations at all as they rely on authors being aware of several kinetic semantics, yet we assume so for the sake of having nearly anything whatsoever measurable for our purposes.
(As the one who calced them both) They have an equal amount of assumptions. It needs another thread to speak about which is betterI also agree with that one due to fewer assumptions needed.
That means they travelled 0.15852885225 meters in a dayIf the 6.88 times Jupiter gets accepted. That means when they traveled roughly half the world in 6 months. The ship traveled around 2500 KM a day
Anyway are we waiting for more staff input?That means they travelled 0.15852885225 meters in a day