WrongIdea21
He/Him- 4,089
- 2,153
- Thread starter
- #81
Bump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ligthing has several Tier 7 feats, so yes it should have absurdly more energyLightning heats the air up so much specifically because air is a poor conductor of electricity, more conductive materials won't be heated up anywhere near as much.
Additionally, assuming that artifcially produced long lasting lightning has ad least as high power (energy/ time) as a normal lightning bolt rather then just having as much energy is an assumption that would need to be backed up in each case.
???You guys know you can't multiply heat, right? Like, that isn't how heat works.
The "5x the surface of the sun" is used instead of actually converting the units.???
When was heat multiplied?
It's not multiplying the heat of the sun's surface. It's just stating a fact that lightning happens to be 5x as hot as the sun's surface.The "5x the surface of the sun" is used instead of actually converting the units.
I know, but it's ever so slightly less that that. 27760 Celsius is the correct temperature for the conversion, I believe.It's not multiplying the heat of the sun's surface. It's just stating a fact that lightning happens to be 5x as hot as the sun's surface.
I'm not sure why you're nitpicking, but we know.I know, but it's ever so slightly less that that. 27760 Celsius is the correct temperature for the conversion, I believe.
If it is 0 degrees Fahrenheit, and it will be twice as hot tommorow, what is the temperature tommorow?Well that's what the National Weather Service did
The Sun's surface is 10 thousand Fahrenheit, and lightning is 50 thousand Fahrenheit
Because heat multiplication, which people were using earlier to get 28k, doesn't work. That's my one issue.I'm not sure why you're nitpicking, but we know.
Again, it's not literal multiplication. It's a generalized number to make it easier to put it into context for the average person, like Emerald said.Because heat multiplication, which people were using earlier to get 28k, doesn't work. That's my one issue.
That's incorrect. 0 degrees Fahrenheit isn't absolute 0, so multiplying it by 2 would actually be a higher number.It will be 0 cause you can't multiply zero by anything
Then we agree, I must have misunderstood the position the OP took.Again, it's not literal multiplication. It's a generalized number to make it easier to put it into context for the average person, like Emerald said.
We know that it's 27760º C. 28k is just easier and quicker to write in the OP. For the actual profiles, the 27760 figure is likely to be included in the notes section.
Actually, going outside when it's twice as hot as 0 Fahrenheit would be fairly dangerous, considering it would be 459.6692 Fahrenheit.That's incorrect. 0 degrees Fahrenheit isn't absolute 0, so multiplying it by 2 would actually be a higher number.
Okay. What has been accepted here can probably be applied then....
what?
the thread is fine to pass