- 2,369
- 2,174
devilishly fine. thanks klolRobots and other mechanical things usually go for 50% from my knowledge
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
devilishly fine. thanks klolRobots and other mechanical things usually go for 50% from my knowledge
Bump? Is it possible to find the size?Question.
If a 1,000km structure isn't anywhere near outerspace of a planet. Is that enough proof of the planet being bigger than Earth?
And if so how do I go about finding it's size?
I'm gonna bump this one because I couldn't think of a good answer for it.Hello again.
How would I calculate the lifting strength of someone ripping a steel door off it's hinges merely by twisting the handle so hard the door warps around said handle?
Ok then. Thank you.I'm gonna bump this one because I couldn't think of a good answer for it.
if you know their initial velocity you can do projectile motion under constant acceleration, no?If there's a feat involving someone being thrown up off screen, and they end up falling down a while later, how do I find the height they were thrown up to for PE/KE?
boopWhat's the AP needed to do this:
find KE of such a thingTrouble in Bikini Bottom town:
How would one go about the LS of a 4 inch tall character lifting and turning an entire planet upside down with one hand?
Straightforward enough. Thanks for the quick reply!find KE of such a thing
[use spunchbop arm length + radius of earth for the radius, then find the arc length of that using 180 degrees, then divide that arc length by the time taken to get your speed and then there's KE]
then divide said KE by the arc length that you already calculated
and that's your force in newtons
We decided to use diameter instead, as using radius of the earth gave MFTL speed.
MFTL+ KE is a big nono. the method i suggested works for regular stuff but MFTL+ KE just completely ***** physics so that won't be allowed, lmfaoWe decided to use diameter instead, as using radius of the earth gave MFTL speed.
Yep. The speed has been fixed to Sub-relativistic.MFTL+ KE is a big nono. the method i suggested works for regular stuff but MFTL+ KE just completely ***** physics so that won't be allowed, lmfao
ALSO, joules:newtons is not 1:1. what i said was divide the joules from KE by the distance travelled in the arc, THAT is what gives you your force in newtons.
I'm assuming you mean the velocity at which they were flung up? That'd be easy to find, but it doesn't seem like nearly enough speed to have flung them high enough to fall down like 10 something seconds later.if you know their initial velocity you can do projectile motion under constant acceleration, no?
Almost sure It's just like that, even If It's ridicullousBack at it again with a weird one for Spongebob and Lifting Strength, this time lifting the world ocean in a reef blower after sucking it all up, and trying to figure out the LS required to only be moved 37.68 cm from the point blank explosion of said reef blower unphased.
How would one calculate the pressure, and explosion of the entire ocean from a very small container?
I assume the use of Fluid Pressure is fine, and then Newton Meters, but the circumstances are literally ridiculous lol
Speed coming from a statement cannot be considered calc-stacking. Ever.Is it possible to obtain the LS of someone who can brandish a sword that weighs 3e10 kg at Mach 40? Or is it considered calc staking? Note that the speed comes from a statement
Is this the formula/calculator for that?But you will need the distance moved for displacement. 2 radians is apparently the default. From there you just find the total length of the weapon and multiply it with the radian value to get displacement in meters.
if it's a visual medium then you could calculate the KE of them swinging the sword, and divide it by the length of the arc they swung it in to get force in newtonsIs it possible to obtain the LS of someone who can brandish a sword that weighs 3e10 kg at Mach 40? Or is it considered calc staking? Note that the speed comes from a statement
Eh no, here you don't have to screw around with that.
hello?What's the AP needed to do this:
i honestly couldn't tell you if that's a calculable thinghello?
for the record, joules ARE newton meters. it's another way of writing the same measurement, like how you can write newtons as kg m/s^2.This infamous scene:
Was it right for me to use the full distance Yujiro walked (approximately, through pixel scaling) to get newton meters by dividing joules by said distance, or should I have used the low and high end potential thickness of the ballistic glass he was pressing his face into for it since that is the distance he's actually pushing/breaking the glass?
Calc blog
Ty for the clarification. Makes more sense. That said, the question remains whether it was correct for me to use the total distance Yujiro walked, or the distance (thickness) of the glass he spent like 20 seconds pushing?for the record, joules ARE newton meters. it's another way of writing the same measurement, like how you can write newtons as kg m/s^2.
you divide newton meters (joules) by meters (distance) to get newtons (force)
my initial thought is the thickness of the glass because that's where the force is being applied, that's where work is being doneTy for the clarification. Makes more sense. That said, the question remains whether it was correct for me to use the total distance Yujiro walked, or the distance (thickness) of the glass he spent like 20 seconds pushing?
I was just worried using that thickness would have led to some pretty absurd results, hence my initial instinct was to use the distance traveled. Ty again for the help.my initial thought is the thickness of the glass because that's where the force is being applied, that's where work is being done
and obviously to get LS from this you're rearranging the formula for work done, so
There will be a G1 Transformers revision upcoming to address this, heralded by Emirp Sumitpo, but he's currently busy with some other stuff.There aren't any calcs for this
prooooooooobably wouldn't be relevantIs there a way to calculate the energy of a black hole? not the energy needed to create one but the energy released by one