New KHR Calc

[RinkakuKagune]

I made a new calc of the XX Burner here, based off DodoNova's previous one (don't worry I didn't use calc stacking).

It should be a huge bump up in the Tiers.

 

[Xanxussama1010]

Fix your link. I got an error when clicked it.

Anyway, this is the calc that he talking about.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

It seems like ArbitraryNumbers accepted the calculation, so the results should probably be acceptable to use.

However, it might be best to wait a while for input from other calc group members, in order to make sure.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

That's why I didn't add the results in yet.

If it's not too much to ask coild you highlight this thread please?

 

[Antvasima]

I do not think that it seems important enough, but I vaguely recall Dragonmasterxyz was interested in the last KHR revision thread, so you can ask him to participate.

Also, we cannot scale by claims of being "x times more powerful" and the like.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

I do not think that it seems important enough, but I vaguely recall Dragonmasterxyz was interested in the last KHR revision thread, so you can ask him to participate.

Also, we cannot scale by claims of being "x times more powerful" and the like.

Well in the calc in question I was scaling downwards. If Daemon Spade claimed to be 10x weaker than before then any one that can harm him from before will be 6-C. The High 6-C comes from the actual calc itself. But if that's still a problem we should just put all Simon and Vongola Guardians as; 6-C possibly High 6-C (Except for Mukuro and Hibari, who are of course High 6-C).

 

[RinkakuKagune]

I also replied on the comments btw.

 

[Antvasima]

I do not know how to properly scale the characters, but Dragonmasterxyz might be able to help out, if you ask him to reply here.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

Dang. I just edited Tsuna's profile RIGHT NOW because I saw the comment on the calc saying it could be used. Sorry about that.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

I'm being a pest but could you please revert the edit. I was being stupid sorry.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay, but do as I told you and ask Dragonmasterxyz to give his input here.

 

[FanofRPGs]

The calc needs to be fixed. I attempted the calc a month or two ago and could not find a good way to scale.

Going by your calc, you took a pixel scaling ratio from one panel, and tried to apply it to another panel. This is not allowed, and should be discredited. Each panel works on a different scale with a different angle, and would be crazy to scale one scale to another.

Nevermind the fact that it is accepted after just ONE admin said "seems fine."

I am sure Tsuna is 6-C by that, just by eyeballing the feat its a 6-C feat, but the way in such feat was calculated is wrong. Perhaps one may calculate it by this scan?




Use the explosion formula and get the result, that's fine.

But the calculation method done is wrong and may count as calc stacking (I need to recheck the rules), and it irks me most that its getting accepted by one comment on how it "looks fine"

 

[RinkakuKagune]

I'll attempt the calc again then. When I do I'll add Dragonmaster to this thread.

 

[Antvasima]

@FanofRPGs

Well, it was due to that ArbitraryNumbers accepted the calculation, but I appreciate that you took the time to evaluate it. It needs to be adjusted accordingly then.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

Looks fine to me. As long as the calc is fine, I'm fine.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:RinkakuKagune/XX_Burner_Calc_(Revised)

New Calc here.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:RinkakuKagune/Complete_XX_Burner_Calc


New Calc here.

 

[RinkakuKagune]

New Thread Her: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/991152