- 11,624
- 15,996
The feat from RtN is valid. It just won't scale to stats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah just wait for Ghostimuscrime's big CRTThe feat from RtN is valid. It just won't scale to stats.
why not? it should still scale to the Bijuu shouldn't it?The feat from RtN is valid. It just won't scale to stats.
It's a creation feat. We don't scale those to stats by default.why not? it should still scale to the Bijuu shouldn't it?
Actually, the Jiraiya argument you used to support this argument, I think, removes the ambiguity.Oh yeah I kinda expected it to come from there cause I don't recall seeing anyone else use the argument. It's not the first argument I'd use due to the vagueness though.
Nah that just supports it to some extent but isn't concrete proof. It could not be such an analytical thing and rather Kurama just being like "Ah shit an Uchiha that's strong and can control me, it must be Madara!" Eapecially since it's an initial reaction.Actually, the Jiraiya argument you used to support this argument, I think, removes the ambiguity.
is it because of the UES thing?It's a creation feat. We don't scale those to stats by default.
That's part of it.is it because of the UES thing?
but like....we scale Super Shenron to 2-C for creating 7 universes...That's part of it.
Having a UES doesn't guarantee that you scale to such feats, but it's a nonstarter without it.
Nardo Fans can't stop mentioning other verses
1. I'm not in charge of Dragon Ball. I'm in charge of Naruto. So....but like....we scale Super Shenron to 2-C for creating 7 universes...
yeah i just realized he's 2-C with wishes. physically he's 3-B for dwarfing galaxies1. I'm not in charge of Dragon Ball. I'm in charge of Naruto. So....
2. Pretty sure Ki is accepted as a UES. But again, I dunno how they handle it over there.
Immeasurable chakra from tt > any miniscule chakra gotten from the tailed beast. Obito is same person using it in both cases with more or less superior chakra control so sword of nonuboku> LIT. How's the fraud agenda looking?It's a creation feat. We don't scale those to stats by default.
someone made a thread specifically not long agouh yeah? you specified movie keys hence I'm stating a version with all pierrot canon
the feats and explanations are all there, the wiki never rejected the scaling, just its canonicity
As fraudulent as ever!Immeasurable chakra from tt > any miniscule chakra gotten from the tailed beast. Obito is same person using it in both cases with more or less superior chakra control so sword of nonuboku> LIT. How's the fraud agenda looking?
Idk much about the anime scaling anymore, but in the movies:vaguely, how strong would the anime+movies counterparts be compared to Manga ones?
brother does not know what reasoning meansthe wiki simply won't accept it.
hence why I told you, nothing past 5B is getting accepted so im not gonna use those herejust the stuff that can and will readily get accepted, if there's stuff that you think wouldn't take a bible worth of arguments (and get potentially rejected), then that's what i'm after, i don't care if it's higher than 5-B
im good man, if I do make any CRT in the near future it'll be about multipliersNah just wait for Ghostimuscrime's big CRT
lmaoyeah i just realized he's 2-C with wishes. physically he's 3-B for dwarfing galaxies
I was there, the thread was abandoned due to continuity issues, while I think the 2B stuff is probably debunkable, it's bare minnimum Low 2C based on the movies actual events and as Karo said, that 7 bijuu feat issomeone made a thread specifically not long ago
wait does that mean it can be included in the (hypothetical) pierrot canon profiles?The feat from RtN is valid. It just won't scale to stats.
Possibly, yeah.wait does that mean it can be included in the (hypothetical) pierrot canon profiles?
for a fluff rating, similar to etso
And I haven't watched it but ik it has Itachi~/>Obito fuelPossibly, yeah.
Tbh, RtN is canon in every single aspect EXCEPT the fact that it just does not fit into the timeline at all.
Fuel? More like Hell fire lmao. AND it was 100% written by Kishimoto lmao, soooooooooAnd I haven't watched it but ik it has Itachi~/>Obito fuel
Probably Toneri. His bag is insane.Equal Stats, which Naruto Movie Villain is the most Dangerous?
I personally think so, but I scale Jigen quite differently than most people, so the popular answer is prolly that Code stomps.Is Jigen vs Code a good matchup? (Both FP) Mainly because of Jigen's abilities and Code's IQ (lack of).
I think Lee and Guy fight equally at one point in the anime.It should be noted that Naruto gets stronger through the Post Sasuke Retrieval filler arcs too and that the third movie is like in the middle of those (same as the second movie) so Lee could surpass that Naruto and Naruto could surpass that Lee.
that is an issue, but rereading the anime scenes of hags moving the moon got me thinking, if that one was a contradiction to the canon timeline as well but its still a part of the anime regardless im starting to think it was more of a writing flaw than actually it being non canon necessarilyPossibly, yeah.
Tbh, RtN is canon in every single aspect EXCEPT the fact that it just does not fit into the timeline at all.
The anime isn't canon to the manga tho. And even if it were, in cases where there are contradictions, we would defer to the source material, which is the manga (and its canonical supplementary material) in this case. So nothing really changes in that regard.that is an issue, but rereading the anime scenes of hags moving the moon got me thinking, if that one was a contradiction to the canon timeline as well but its still a part of the anime regardless im starting to think it was more of a writing flaw than actually it being non canon necessarily
the anime does follow the canon lore of the manga (not saying i wanna use anime feats for the manga) and that contradiction still exists in the anime only episodes so im saying based on that we shouldnt say rtn cant be used anime only profiles when its more of a writing error instead of it being non canonThe anime isn't canon to the manga tho. And even if it were, in cases where there are contradictions, we would defer to the source material, which is the manga (and its canonical supplementary material) in this case. So nothing really changes in that regard.
Oh, you meant purely within the anime continuity? I guess, yeah. Haven't watched the anime in ages, so I can't say for sure, but it's prolly fine if you're doing a "composite Pierrot" type deal.the anime does follow the canon lore of the manga (not saying i wanna use anime feats for the manga) and that contradiction still exists in the anime only episodes so im saying based on that we shouldnt say rtn cant be used anime only profiles when its more of a writing error instead of it being non canon
Dang, didnt know that was allowedOh, you meant purely within the anime continuity? I guess, yeah. Haven't watched the anime in ages, so I can't say for sure, but it's prolly fine if you're doing a "composite Pierrot" type deal.
Well, the villains, chronologically, are:Equal Stats, which Naruto Movie Villain is the most Dangerous?
Wait, how bad does this nerf Shino?I swear, I need to do a "Canon Menma" fanfic, or one where everyone has their movie personalities, that'd be cool as hell.