• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Naruto to Boruto Discussion Thread

Doesn’t this scan prove EMS is “at least” additive?

So when he then runs his Chakra through the Eyes, the end result (EMS Ocular Power) is at a basic level, Sasuke + Itachi?

This, of course, doesn’t consider any training or Zenkai Boosts ontop of this. Just a basic “Out the box” level.
 
NeoKingOfLight said:
Doesn’t this scan prove EMS is “at least” additive?

So when he then runs his Chakra through the Eyes, the end result (EMS Ocular Power) is at a basic level, Sasuke + Itachi?

This, of course, doesn’t consider any training or Zenkai Boosts ontop of this. Just a basic “Out the box” level.
Click to expand...
It's not like Itachi's eyes contain all of his chakra.
 
Man this site is really good if you open your mnd to it. When I first joined i was so annoyed like the admins skeptisms are too much and y'all are always requesting for overwhelming evidence than necessary. Heck sometimes I even thought flat out evidence were being rejected. But the more I conversed with people and argued the more I realised I might actually be inflating stuff more than normal and taking flimsy evidence as concrete stuff just coz I wanted something given to a character I like. And from there things made much more sense. I still disagree with a lot of stuff but I iust realised I became more concerned with consistency and showings of actual feats instead of straight up taking the highest possible interpretation of any feat I find. I was just discussing with some people of site. And they kept calling me a skeptic and I was asking for too much evidence. And I then realised wow I've changed. I used to be like them.


Anyways glad to be here guys.
I still believe is star level and mftl naruto verse though
 
karo_senpaii said:
Man this site is really good if you open your mnd to it. When I first joined i was so annoyed like the admins skeptisms are too much and y'all are always requesting for overwhelming evidence than necessary. Heck sometimes I even thought flat out evidence were being rejected. But the more I conversed with people and argued the more I realised I might actually be inflating stuff more than normal and taking flimsy evidence as concrete stuff just coz I wanted something given to a character I like. And from there things made much more sense. I still disagree with a lot of stuff but I iust realised I became more concerned with consistency and showings of actual feats instead of straight up taking the highest possible interpretation of any feat I find. I was just discussing with some people of site. And they kept calling me a skeptic and I was asking for too much evidence. And I then realised wow I've changed. I used to be like them.
Click to expand...
I am still sceptical about this. I'll wait for more evidence.
 
UchihaSlayer96 said:
Yeah, I also vaguely remember a High 1-A feat for Itachi in CFYOW. It checks out.
Click to expand...
This reminds me. What exactly happened here with itachi fans that was so bad the statement "only one with a mangyeko sharingan can defeat me" used as the example in faq. Did people really use that as a nlf?
 
karo_senpaii said:
This reminds me. What exactly happened here with itachi fans that was so bad the statement "only one with a mangyeko sharingan can defeat me" used as the example in faq. Did people really use that as a nlf?
Click to expand...
I doubt it. It's probably just a fairly famous example of a NLF-ish statement that they decided to use. Kinda like the "only a Stand can defeat a Stand" statement. I think most people don't take those super literally, but I'm sure there's the special few who do.
 
I mean has Itachi been proven wrong?

I don't think any pure MS user has ever been defeated by someone who isn't an MS user, so empirically pushes nerd glasses up with one finger he's not wrong...
 
EmperorRorepmeThree said:
I mean has Itachi been proven wrong?

I don't think any pure MS user has ever been defeated by someone who isn't an MS user, so empirically pushes nerd glasses up with one finger he's not wrong...
Click to expand...
Hold that thought
0006-012.png
 
karo_senpaii said:
Man this site is really good if you open your mnd to it. When I first joined i was so annoyed like the admins skeptisms are too much and y'all are always requesting for overwhelming evidence than necessary. Heck sometimes I even thought flat out evidence were being rejected. But the more I conversed with people and argued the more I realised I might actually be inflating stuff more than normal and taking flimsy evidence as concrete stuff just coz I wanted something given to a character I like. And from there things made much more sense. I still disagree with a lot of stuff but I iust realised I became more concerned with consistency and showings of actual feats instead of straight up taking the highest possible interpretation of any feat I find. I was just discussing with some people of site. And they kept calling me a skeptic and I was asking for too much evidence. And I then realised wow I've changed. I used to be like them.
Click to expand...
I mean I partially agree but I also think there's a difference between wanting consistency and wanting certainty.
karo_senpaii said:
Anyways glad to be here guys.
I still believe is star level and mftl naruto verse though
Click to expand...
Real
 
BTW I wonder if there's databook statements to place the Giant Rasengan (at least the one used by Kurama Influence/Vermilion Mode Part II Naruto) over the Vermilion Rasengan used by Part I Naruto.
 
BlastX said:
BTW I wonder if there's databook statements to place the Giant Rasengan (at least the one used by Kurama Influence/Vermilion Mode Part II Naruto) over the Vermilion Rasengan used by Part I Naruto.
Click to expand...
Wasn't there a statement about it being comparable to a meteor impact or something like that?
 
Yeah, and it was treated as Naruto's Ultimate Move in early Part II.

I'm not saying it should be a 10x multiplier or any of that shit obviously, just that it can scale above the Part I Vermilion Rasengan.
 
BlastX said:
Yeah, and it was treated as Naruto's Ultimate Move in early Part II.

I'm not saying it should be a 10x multiplier or any of that shit obviously, just that it can scale above the Part I Vermilion Rasengan.
Click to expand...
So it should still have the same power output difference, correct?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

HelloThere1089
Naruto/Boruto character with the best BIQ feats
Replies
23
Views
1K
karo_senpaii
karo_senpaii
Apollonir.Scale
Naruto Hax Upgrading
2 3
Replies
119
Views
11K
Arc7Kuroi
Arc7Kuroi
RanaProGamer
Fixing the Naruto Storm Scaling Chain
Replies
25
Views
3K
RanaProGamer
RanaProGamer
Godernet
  • Locked
Hags and Kags being Divas (Naruto CRT)
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
Godernet
Godernet
sageof8paths
  • Locked
My expansive truth seeking balls of steel
Replies
24
Views
1K
Damage3245
Damage3245
Back
Top