• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Naruto Planet Size

TataHakai

TataHakai

VS Battles
Retired
2,519
1,364
I know this topic has been discussed to death but it's pretty important for the verse, it's related to scaling the size of the planet from the size of the roots of the god tree as i did here

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...th_time_but_this_time_it'll_be_fine_i_promise

It results in a planet with a diameter of around 45,000 kilometers, just under 4x bigger than our own Earth so obviously this would be a huge upgrade for a lot of calculations.

What really needs to be discussed is the calculation itself, because if there are no flaws to it then there's no reason NOT to use it, if we're just going to discard all calculations for planet sizes then we'd have to apply that across the board and downgrade a lot of verses.

So yes, check out the calculation and give your thoughts on whether it looks valid or not, i'm clearly FOR the acceptance of the calc otherwise i wouldn't have even bothered to make it at all, this is just a redux of an accepted calculation on Narutoforums which i redone because the pixel scaling was off, lowballing the size by thousands of kilometers.

CALC MEMBERS AND STAFF ONLY FOR NOW, We don't want this post to get cluttered with arguments.
 
Personally, I never liked the idea of calculating the size of fictional planets unless they have obvious characteristics that make them larger than your average planet, like the Earth in OP apparently being bigger than moons. I feel like that unless a series uses the Blue Marble image, there's always going to be something that would make the planet bigger or smaller than Earth due to an inexact scale and inexact proportions, if that makes any sense.

So, I don't really have an opinion on this matter I guess.
 
No, but I am 99% with Darkanine here, you can't reasonably expect stuff like that to be consistent throughout and correlate with the intent of the series.
 
Sorry to barge in but this would still be consistent considering this would only affect high/god tiers only. This is also under 4x (we had people get like 7x) + Fairy Tail is able to use a bigger earth for the series so I don't see a reason why this wouldn't get to use it either

How would u think that this wouldn't be consistent?
 
Why don't you use the image that shows the entire planet to calculate its size? And where do those 63 kilometers come from?
 
Pretty sure we accept FT's planet size off one map and one statement, not sure why we'd have it any different for Naruto.

Also 63km comes from the accepted size of the god tree in Narutoforums.
 
According to IMade, the size of Fairy Tail's world was measured from a map because its planetary shots didn't show us the continents we knew from the maps. That doesn't seem to be the case in your calc.
 
I already explained my problem with using shots from The Last, beyond the results they give and about the methods.
 
I agree with darkanine on the subject of using maps to calc planet sizes.
 
Therefir said:
According to IMade, the size of Fairy Tail's world was measured from a map because its planetary shots didn't show us the continents we knew from the maps. That doesn't seem to be the case in your calc.
Click to expand...
Commenting to say that this is correct. We had to use a map for Fairy Tail since the planetary shot we had for it did not show us the continents.

This is not the case for Naruto, the planetary shot reveals the continents and countries.

Either way, I'm the same as Darkanine and going along with One Piece and just settling on using irl Earth's size. Kepekely advocated for the same after all the numerous calcs were forwarded to him.
 
The planetary shots reveal continents and countries without annotations for those countries and continents, as i said before annotations are superior evidence to the guesswork that is required with the last map.

Dark literally said he didn't have an opinion on the topic, not sure what you mean by that.

It's pretty much the exact same situation as fairy tail here, the planet is scaled off a small part of the Map.

If we're all going to agree with Dark on the map topic then we better get to downgrading all verses that use maps to scale calculations.
 
We'd get near Neptune sized results. I disagree with the method mostly because the map is drawn out onto the planet by guessing where the countries are rather than having actual annotations like the one i used.
 
Omimi said:
@Therefir

https://www.narutoforums.org/xfa-blog-entry/naruto-country-size-again.22520/#comment-239885

i don't think u guys going to accept a calc from last movie planetary shots cuz that make nv earth huge 2x bigger then tata's lol
Click to expand...
I showed Therefir this calc already as an example of a calc using the 63 km but no actual calc for how they got it. It's also an outdated calc with dead links and outdated links as admitted in the comments. Even in the comments they make fun of a current VS Wiki calc member that made a calc contradicts that calc.
 
It's best not to use a calc from the OBD unless it's recent or has been evaluated and accepted here. Most of the calcs from the OBD are outdated and wrong. We tend to do calcs a lot differently here.
 
Kep's is based on an outdated image and BMW's is based on a false assumption.

Plus, Kep reiterated that we should just use irl planet size. 63Km seems nonexistent and honestly not possible by scans.
 
IIrc the reason why he said that cause we were getting Naruto earth sizes that were like 5x bigger or more and that it would just lead to outliers for most of the calcs that we have or use now

EDIT: just cause something is outdated doesnt mean it cant be used. As long as it makes perfect sense and it makes things consistent there is nothing wrong w/ it
 
I use outdated when things have already been redone with a different accepted result or deemed incorrect, thus they are outdated. That specific image was deemed incorrect.
 
now everything is outdated ?

i can understand that nf calc is outdated cuz it was from 2014

but u are saying (may)2018 calc also outdated.how? u want every years new calc for same things?

why nitpicking so much all the time...... sigh
 
If you understood what I typed then you would see where I point out that the 2018 calc by Kep used an outdated image that had false information. Said image was deemed incorrect and needed to be redone.

Edit: Plus, Kep himself reiterated he's for an irl Earth sized Naruto planet after he had made that calc based on an incorrect image.
 
Since i can't find the root sizes for 63 km i decided to re-do it from our currently accepted shinju tree size here

Untitledsasaedada
god tree width =63 km = 51 px
Root size = 22 px = 27.1764705883 km


Slight diameter downgrade to 35,971.6017029 kilometers
 
I still feel we should just not calculate the size of a planet and upgrade feats with it.

Betond feeling very calc stackish, it also leads to inflated results more often then not.
 
It's from the accepted calculations on NF, but i can't find the calc that puts it at 63km, just calcs that use it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sus
calculating the size of a planet and its GBE
Replies
8
Views
752
Requiem_Yoriichi
Requiem_Yoriichi
Nami_Kami
The Desert Spada and Ground Death calcs
2 3
Replies
112
Views
5K
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
  • Locked
DBS: Destruction of Planet Vegeta, Frieza Upgrade
2 3 4
Replies
132
Views
10K
Damage3245
Damage3245
Gravitational wave is often ignored in calculations
Replies
0
Views
391
VictoriaGenesisBOA
SizzlinSelect
Problems with MHS MCU/TASM Spider-Man Calculations
Replies
3
Views
925
darkphantom9805
darkphantom9805
Back
Top