- 1,012
- 622
I dont think so because as @DarkDragonMedeus stated the speed of the debris scattering is already lowballed to "average" to compensate for that but a CGM probably knows better
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DBS: Destruction of Planet Vegeta, Frieza Upgrade
- 11,220
- 17,425
Clover? What'd I do???
- 224
- 134
I think he meant klolClover? What'd I do???
- 1,012
- 622
My bad I wanted to write KLOLClover? What'd I do???
- 32,758
- 37,913
Couldn't find such a formula for relativistic KE so until something like that comes up (DT didn't greenlight it AFAIK), we stick with the Relativistic KE calculator.
- 29,709
- 24,644
KLOL506; please stop posting. I never said I don't have an argument to post. I'm going to delete the last few comments that are derailing the hell out of this thread. If you've got a problem with me, take it elsewhere for the love of God.
- 21,101
- 30,040
Yeah you use 1/12th
- 11,220
- 17,425
For planet destruction calcs? No, that's never been the case. We have a ton of planet destruction calcs involving flying debris that use 1/2
Edit: It's been explained why in further detail above
Last edited:
- 32,758
- 37,913
Can't do that for relativistic KE, and your 1/6 suggestion hasn't been accepted by DT, if anything we were waiting for an alternative from him, but uh... he dipped so tough luck.
- 2,069
- 1,745
Could you not just multiply the KE value by the Lorentz factor (the multiplier that tells you how much higher your KE would be than its Newtonian counterpart) at whatever speed it is?
- 1,276
- 328
You mean, like:
(mass / 12 x velocity²) x Lorentz Factor for omnidirectional relativistic KE?
- 2,069
- 1,745
Yeah, pretty much.
- 1,276
- 328
I'm down for that, can't speak for everyone though.
- 32,758
- 37,913
The Lorentz factor multiplier appears to be barely a 1x multiplier using the speed difference according to this calculator.
So KE: (1/12) * 5.083E+26 * 15606258.2721^2 = 1.0316596e+40 J or 2.4657256 quettatons of TNT, High 5-A+
I can't evaluate my own calc so make that of what you will.
So KE: (1/12) * 5.083E+26 * 15606258.2721^2 = 1.0316596e+40 J or 2.4657256 quettatons of TNT, High 5-A+
I can't evaluate my own calc so make that of what you will.
Last edited:
- 29,709
- 24,644
Low 4-C begins at 7.505 Quettatons, I believe, so that result would be High 5-A.
- 1,276
- 328
Makes sense. I mean, even for a 2x multiplier, you need to be going 86.6% SoL. The multiplier is mostly negligible under 50% SoL.
- 32,758
- 37,913
Corrected.
- 32,758
- 37,913
The energy is more spread out in this case.
- 1,012
- 622
Wouldn't all of this warrant a different blog with multiple methods out of which one method gets accepted? i feel like the currently accepted one with 2 CGM votes and an admin vote should be kept as it is
- 32,758
- 37,913
No? You'd only need to dump in the correction and job's done.
Gilad_Hyperstar
He/Him- 11,188
- 4,222
I think Planet Vegeta being much bigger than Earth seems accurate since it's a rocky planet with 10 times Earth's gravity. Usually Planets like this are pretty big, especially when Earth is specifically mentioned by King Cold to be very small and insignificant (unlike Vegeta)
- 11,220
- 17,425
Planet destruction calcs involving flying debris don’t use any alterations to the KE or relativistic KE formula, it’s that simple. I don’t think this is the thread to try and change that
Last edited:
- 1,276
- 328
Perhaps this could help in determining the size (or not) of planet Vegeta by comparing it to its moons.
- 1,276
- 328
I did NOT expect it to send the entire thing, I thought it would only send the link-
Nvm, that's an unknown planet, carry on
Nvm, that's an unknown planet, carry on
- 11,220
- 17,425
We don’t know the size of any of the moons, compared to the point of comparison we have between Planet Vegeta and a Super Dragon Ball
- 1,012
- 622
this is what I was trying to say. That seems like a topic for a staff discussion thread standard change rather than something to be decided on the fly for a calc that has always been done using the same method
- 1,276
- 328
Toeiverse: Freeza destroys Planet Vegeta
vsbattles.fandom.com
I found this calc, which apparently compares the size between Earth and Vegeta?
- 2,228
- 2,569
I never thought about using GT, wowToeiverse: Freeza destroys Planet Vegeta
I found this calc, which apparently compares the size between Earth and Vegeta?
- 11,220
- 17,425
Toeiverse stuff can’t be used for main canon calcs, if I’m not mistaken
- 2,228
- 2,569
Yeah the other interpretation of planet vegeta we had before is fine
- 1,276
- 328
Even though both Toriyama and Shueisha consider GT to be canon?
I mean, GT is even on the official timeline by Shueisha
- 1,294
- 985
- Thread starter
- #74
Even though it's regarded as an alternate timeline, we can't use exclusive sizes from Toei for canonToeiverse: Freeza destroys Planet Vegeta
I found this calc, which apparently compares the size between Earth and Vegeta?
Spinoirr
He/Him- 14,822
- 7,950
Also not to mention planet Vegeta in the broly movie seems to look to have way more water then earth does, thus it seems more in line with a water world that are normally larger then earth is
- 1,012
- 622
unfortunately we can’t really use it. while the cosmologies are the same it doesn’t mean planet sizes are gonna be the same too
- 974
- 1,042
It’d only be in use for Toei iterations of the characters. So you could get a revision for Toei Frieza, Bardock, etc and scale from there if you wanted, but you couldn’t apply it to canon.
- 1,276
- 328
It's the only actual reference we have to Planet Vegeta's size; it's either this or no true reference. Pick your poison.
Also, why would planet sizes change in a different timeline? Occum's razor would suggest they are the same more than likely (Also pretty sure GT splits from Post-Buu Saga, which is tied to the main timeline anyways)
- 11,220
- 17,425
We're not having this discussion now, this was already decided before and trying to overturn it would require it's own thread)
Also, Toeiverse deviates from the main timeline much earlier than that. Filler episodes and movies comprise such deviations
Similar threads
