My Hero Academia: Sniper Rifle

[Damage3245]

Well, I wouldn't say I have no problem whatsoever - but what is the counter-proposal for what we do instead?

 

[Therefir]

Stop bothering people about a calc that probably isn't even going to be used in the profiles.

The thread has already reached a consensus, but clearly you can't stop bumping the thread and repeating the same arguments as before.

@Damage3245 I think this thread should be closed, it was a waste of time since the beginning.

 

[Damage3245]

@Therefir; I don't have a problem with closing the thread but I'll allow the OP a chance just to say what they think should be done instead.

 

[Therefir]

But they have nothing to say, we have expressed both interpretations, but what really bothers me most is the uselessness of it, talking about a calc that was replaced.

 

[Onelixy]

Well, I wouldn't say I have no problem whatsoever - but what is the counter-proposal for what we do instead?

Either an acknowledgment implemented in the calculation(s) that explains this is based on and assumes the bullet is fired and Shigaraki's hand is first seen at the same time. Maybe include that's the interpretation and consensus this community arrived at, and direct it to this page, or something akin to that.
Or, we figure out a different way to achieve a timeframe if possible. And, if none of that is viable, dismiss the calculation as a whole.

That's what I think would've been appropriate.

I guess you can close the thread now if that's what's wanted. I've said my piece, and I hope not to deaf ears.

@Therefir I'm not trying to bother or annoy, but I think there's a legitimate issue with people jumping on certain interpretations when there's a lack of substantiation. While it's entirely possible this feat is fine as is, I think there should be an acknowledgment in the calculation (which people outside of this community rely on) that this is only one of several ways the feat could've played out, and shouldn't be treated as a fact.

 

[Damage3245]

Yeah, the calculation may not even end up as the primary one for the character in question.

OP seems fine for the thread to be closed so I'll close it now.