• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Moon Moving Question for calcs

16,927
4,844
Just a small question and I have somewhere to be soon, so i'll ask it now to get it out the way.

For feats that involve moving the moon, is it an actual requirement to have a distance be applied to the feat or is there a way for us to calculate moon moving feats without a distance?

That is all. I'd appreciate some feedback on this please as im seeing a bit of both answers thrown around and IDK which one is correct.
 
Distance is required for literally every "moving" feat in fiction. Otherwise, unquantifiable "5-C"
 
Thats strange then, because ive seen a moon calc that didnt use distance but the rotation of the planet (earth in this case) and it ended up being High 5-A.

And calc-group members have approved the math itself being legitimate too.
 
If it's just a statement, then it would be 5-C, but if there's onscreen movement, then calcing the speed of it being moved is applicable.
 
I feel like a simply statement, it should be below 5-C, since moving < destroying; so unless there's a minimal amount of energy to put a celestial body out of its orbit (according to SA its needed 1/10 of its weight to do so, but I think its has no scientific basis), I'll go with At most 5-C.
 
Mmm, not sure, one do not need to completely stop the moon, just moving it out of its orbit.
 
I feel that the more accurate result would be an integral of the KE of an orbiting body (G*M*m/[2*r]), but I'm too old for integrals.
 
Back
Top