- 1,290
- 459
Oh, thanksЕnd of stories
EoS base Mob = ???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, thanksЕnd of stories
EoS base Mob = ???
I think Teru also needs a new keyBase BoS | Base Post-47 Division Ark | 100% | ???/EoS
BoS = High 8-CI think Teru also needs a new key
It's WorksBoS = High 8-C
EoS = 7-C+
That's fine, since Hanazawa himself said he's been training for a while and there's been a gap of at least a month, probably more since Claw's invasion.BoS = High 8-C
EoS = 7-C+
I'm not sure. Personally, I don't think so because his only real feats are blocking his attacks with the umbrella and using it as a barrier. I mean, MAYBE he could have 6-C durability with the umbrella, but I'm against it since he was never shown to be on-par with Toichiro or 100% Mob in anyway.Would Serizawa escalate to 6-C or not?
Yes, he willWould Serizawa escalate to 6-C or not?
The umbrella is the conductor of his power, not the source. Later on, he used this power much better.That's fine, since Hanazawa himself said he's been training for a while and there's been a gap of at least a month, probably more since Claw's invasion.
I'm not sure. Personally, I don't think so because his only real feats are blocking his attacks with the umbrella and using it as a barrier. I mean, MAYBE he could have 6-C durability with the umbrella, but I'm against it since he was never shown to be on-par with Toichiro or 100% Mob in anyway.
In case he doesn't scale to 6-C he could still scale to 7-C+I'm not sure. Personally, I don't think so because his only real feats are blocking his attacks with the umbrella and using it as a barrier. I mean, MAYBE he could have 6-C durability with the umbrella, but I'm against it since he was never shown to be on-par with Toichiro or 100% Mob in anyway.
That's why I'm bothered by the 6-C scaling for Serizawa. Would there be such a substantial gap between Shimazaki and Serizawa? If they are comparable, then everyone who fought against Shimazaki would scale to 6-C, which ruins the scaling chain.Wait, doesn't this affect Shimazaki? Or we assume that Shimazaki does not have as much raw power but has more "technical".
In this case I agree. And I think we could put 6-C just for its durability.That's why I'm bothered by the 6-C scaling for Serizawa. Would there be such a substantial gap between Shimazaki and Serizawa? If they are comparable, then everyone who fought against Shimazaki would scale to 6-C, which ruins the scaling chain.
Due to the high 6-A feat being an outlier it can not be used.
I have not looked into Mob psycho 100 verse I was under the impression that at least 12 or 15 feats taken from that show are alre 6-A or closer to High 6-A but it seems like there are only a few feats in Tier 6, so I guess we can rule out High 6-A.
Literally 2 feats 6-C for the weakest forms. Scaling up to High 6-C.Due to the high 6-A feat being an outlier it can not be used.
I have not looked into Mob psycho 100 verse I was under the impression that at least 12 or 15 feats taken from that show are alre 6-A or closer to High 6-A but it seems like there are only a few feats in Tier 6, so I guess we can rule out High 6-A.
It looks like the calculation of the explosion was accepted.By the gods, can't we just settle the accepted stuff (6-C/High 6-C and High Hypersonic+) then deal with this? People were saying this could just be solved here and didn't need a separate thread 200 posts ago .
This would give a radius of 75 km for the explosion.Quick question has it been shown that psychic power scales linearly with speed?
If so I might have an alternate way to do the Toichiro explosion
Here's the method 100% Mob is superior to Teruki who can go 60 km/h
100% Anger Mob is roughly equal to 4% Toichiro which would make 100% Toichiro 1500 km/h
We can use that to find the minimum distance and then we can decide if melting can be used
I know and it is likely that they will be rejected. I'm just voicing my thoughtsThese calculations have to be accepted for to begin with, I must remind.
I know and it is likely that they will be rejected. I'm just voicing my thoughts1. Personally, I'm fine with it. I'd have to see what the calculation group members have to say.
2. As I've said, I'm not too confident in the assumption but if others are OK with it then sure.
3. Neutral to it. You'd have to get a calc member to give input there.
Make sense.In general, I go with 1%
You're not a member of the calculation groupWhich calces needs to be accepted? Link me
That’s creepy as hell
I know but I have calc members online on discord duhhhYou're not a member of the calculation group
Oh, in that case, I'll be grateful.I know but I have calc members online on discord duhhh