I actually did use it from the very first video I litterly explained that it was .5 seconds after Raiden cut the APC. In fact you can even see the cut pieces of the APC in the second shot. I brought this up to you and YOU agreed to it. The second timing thing I will check out though, however since it seems that it might outright be invalid I it doesn't seem to matter much now.
Actually that's when Raiden enters blade mode, the boxcar doesn't actually start moving until frame 133. Go check if you don't believe me, it only rotates
Meh, won't matter much now. I got 7-B out of that exact same scene too.
Now that I look at it,
Because you used the time it took after Raiden entered blade mode to when the apc got to him instead of using when the APC actually started moving
That's exactly when the APC starts charging at him tho.
I really don't think it is it doesn't start moving until Raiden whips out his sword all the way
You really need to look in closer if you think that.
No, it rotates in the air until Raiden fully pulls out his sword. Look id be willing to find another clip where its easier to see in order to prove it to you if you want?
Go frame-by-frame my dude, and zoom in specifically for the Boxer and nothing else, it doesn't just rotate, it even approaches closer to PoV.
The result would be the exact same, the APC starts to move almost immediately after Raiden initiates Blade Mode. The basic premise would remain the same regardless of what clip you show me.
I see that that is the case now but just to prove that it's around half a second here.
That's the rain bro. Also it's not from within the cutscene where the Boxer is chopped off.I see that that is the case now but just to prove that it's around half a second here.
Watch YouTube & Vimeo videos frame by frame | Watch Frame by Frame
Watch Frame by Frame allows you to watch YouTube and Vimeo videos frame by frame and in slow motion.
Movement starts at frame 421 and ends at frame 469
Actually if you look at the clip Raiden WALKS faster than the EMP so I guess we have relativistic+ travel speed raiden
Nah, he'd be blatantly FTL given that the EMP burst doesn't even cover as much distance as his moves do. He walked back several meters while the EMP eyeballed alone is hardly breaking the 2 m range.
Doesn't matter whether it's the scene where the boxcar is cut or not. We see objects in the dozens of tons hurled at raiden in around half a second. Also the raindrops are not completely random, they spawn in set patterns all you need to do is find the same raindrop spawn location as the one earlier in the clip. Nothing here changes, the raindrops speed stays the same, and the speed at which the objects are hurled stays the same. It's just nitpicking to say this doesn't count.
It actually kind of does, otherwise we get wildly inconsistent results.
Not the issue, the issue is that those raindrops can vary in pixel-size at a different angle and distance from PoV. Hence why both the Boxer getting cut and the raindrop all need to be in the same exact frame to yield the most accurate results. Don't even get me started on the headaches this would lead to at higher resolutions and image quality.
It isn't nitpicking, the raindrop pixel-size changes, which would make it all the more inconsistent than if you used the raindrop in the same exact scene where the Boxer is being cut. And once you factor in resolution and image quality, you risk increasing those inconsistencies tenfold.
That isn't the point. The point is we have already found the raindrops speed. Changing the angle does not impact that whatsoever. The rains speed does not change end of story.
Grossly incorrect. Changing the angle and distance from PoV wildly changes the pixel-size count of the raindrop and thus changes the meter-per-pixel value travelled by the raindrop, thereby affecting speed in tandem.
Possibly.
Here we go again. WE have found the speed of the rain in a completely flat angle, this is the most correct the speed can be. Changing the angles once again does nothing if we have already established the speed of the rain. But since your so insistent on me doing it your way I will create a whole new clip. I look forward to finding a rain speed nearly exactly the same as we already have it.
You forgot the distance between the raindrop and the PoV bruv.
Except again, you forgot to take into account the distance of the raindrop from PoV. Angle and distance from PoV both combine to influence the pixel-size of the raindrops on the screen.
Why tho? The first video should be more than enough to solve everything. You're just doing too much effort for something that requires so many less steps.
Because you seem insistent on making the timeframe longer than it is. So I will provide a clear view of the shot so there's no room for debate on the timeframe.
Because it leads to less inconsistencies with the observed apparent speed of the rain in dilated time.
But it is just outright wrong. There' no debating that.
Not at all, if anything it would be more wrong to use raindrops from a different scene and then use that exact same scenario in that feat where the raindrops aren't even the same pixel-size anymore.
Well then don't worry I'm re-doing it even though it's probably useless now
Ya forgot to do the slice bruv, but yeah this is the exact scene I would be talking about, almost perfect but you didn't use the slice. Would've been better if you also included the exact scene where the slowdown starts but eh, this will do.
Yeah, I think that's up for debate but I feel that's for another thread.
A Boxer being yeeted at 6-C levels of energy that surpasses everything else in the series is nothing short of an outlier, this isn't even taking into consideration the KE rules it would violate or the fact that Raiden saw it as moving faster than EMPs by the sheer virtue of the Boxer covering that distance much more quickly than he saw the EMP travelling at which point KE would be straight up unusable because FTL.
The slice tanking the speed would only mean Raiden stopped it dead in its tracks, it wouldn't affect the actual speed it crossed the initial distance with, we only need to know how far it covered before time gets further dilated (Though again, the raindrops moving at the same pace even then poses problems). We only need the speed of the distance it covered, extra seconds being added to this entire feat after the APC gets sliced would only mean the raindrops require even more time to travel thus massively increasing the dilation time and thus the APC's speed in tandem.
Good then. That's all you need, anything after that is just more seconds being added by the slices to how long the raindrops were viewed as frozen for.
And what I'm saying is that normal EMP's aren't even visible. This could just as easily be an explosive that releases large amounts of Electromagnetic and other types of waves.
Okay so were good on the apparent speed and the distance correct?
proof?
Once you make a clip involving the parts where Raiden goes into Blade Mode and the part where he slices the APC until Blade Mode wears off, and make proper adjustments to the APC being yeeted which takes roughly a second to move from point A to B, maybe, but I very strongly doubt 6-C going through.
The game itself has something else to say about it: It literally uses electromagnetic pulses.
No. It's against our KE rules to do so, to make up new physics for stuff that defies physics.
