- 2,317
- 1,080
i think what he's saying is that the narrative has too many contradictions if you assume everyone mid or late game has immeasurable speedaccept
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i think what he's saying is that the narrative has too many contradictions if you assume everyone mid or late game has immeasurable speedaccept
Yeah, I stated that earlier that it's JRPG's so this shit is weird. But in cutscenes, dialogues, etc, it's pretty clear cut they have speed limitations. You can only ignore so many plot elements until you have to go "Okay, well...that's probably not what the writers intended for them to be able to do. I don't think Yukari is going back in time to save her father." I think SMT can safely constitute it but not P3-P5. Maybe P5's metaverse stuff if I'm understanding it correctly tho.In all fairness, the issues you've brought up are just a product of the natural discrepancy between travel speed and Combat / Reaction Speed that's present in virtually any JRPG. Those low-end showings wouldn't really vanish even if we downgraded them, since the next most reasonable end is Massively FTL+ off of the Three Wise Men outspeeding a ship that was in the middle of travelling between universes in Strange Journey. It's odd, yeah, but ultimately not practically solvable in a way that corroborates with the nature of the entities they defeat all the time.
This is just Immeasurable again because they go between different space times. Personally, Immeasurable is fine for people without an insane amount of anti featsThree Wise Men outspeeding a ship that was in the middle of travelling between universes in Strange Journey.
That happens a lot in virtually all verses. Authors simply don't know nor care. If the feats are legit still, then that's that.Yeah, I stated that earlier that it's JRPG's so this shit is weird. But in cutscenes, dialogues, etc, it's pretty clear cut they have speed limitations. You can only ignore so many plot elements until you have to go "Okay, well...that's probably not what the writers intended for them to be able to do. I don't think Yukari is going back in time to save her father." I think SMT can safely constitute it but not P3-P5. Maybe P5's metaverse stuff if I'm understanding it correctly tho.
From not being knowledgeable on P1-2 by your own admission, to the claims of Nyx not losing, to Nanako dying, I'm unsure you even played any of these games, enough for me to wonder why you're making these arguments at all. No, Nanako did not die.I seem to recall Nanako dying, so what exactly DID happen then?
No, I'm not. They're immeasurable by the time they can summon and control Low 1-C Demons, which is Mid-Game. Your entire argument hinges on PIS, and the fact that they do not go back in time to respect the past. That's literally the entire concept of Eternal Punishment, he chooses to remember the memories he was sworn to forget in the new universe.Aren't you the one straw manning me? I already pointed out things outside of Makoto's legacy. Like, if you'd say they'd get it statistically at end-game, then at any point during December they could've just been like "Hang on a second, why do we have to fight Nyx?" And just go stop everything.
This post is banking on the concept of Makoto's post-seal which I agree they would not, but now you're gonna have to define WHEN they become Immeasurable speed otherwise they could logically have done it whenever before that and disregard the whole notion of anyone's legacy.
Accel probably got the bad ending where Nanako dies. Even in the other endings she was in bad condition.From not being knowledgeable on P1-2 by your own admission, to the claims of Nyx not losing, to Nanako dying, I'm unsure you even played any of these games, enough for me to wonder why you're making these arguments at all. No, Nanako did not die.
does this apply to P3 pre answer, P4, P5?No, I'm not. They're immeasurable by the time they can summon and control Low 1-C Demons, which is Mid-Game. Your entire argument hinges on PIS, and the fact that they do not go back in time to respect the past. That's literally the entire concept of Eternal Punishment, he chooses to remember the memories he was sworn to forget in the new universe.
Can you tell me why it wouldn't?does this apply to P3 pre answer, P4, P5?
then we should rewrite our description of itLet alone Immeasurable Speed does not mean you can time travel, and it works on a case by case basis.
such as?Let alone that there can be a myriad of in verse reasons to not time travel, or character reasons.
The burden of proof is on you. P2 does not have the same characters or events as P3-5.wouldn't
The problem is that they aren't legit though because of all the anti-feats.That happens a lot in virtually all verses. Authors simply don't know nor care. If the feats are legit still, then that's that.
From not being knowledgeable on P1-2 by your own admission, to the claims of Nyx not losing, to Nanako dying, I'm unsure you even played any of these games, enough for me to wonder why you're making these arguments at all. No, Nanako did not die.
Who is getting Eternal Punishmented here? Why are you bring up that game and Tatsuya's stuff?No, I'm not. They're immeasurable by the time they can summon and control Low 1-C Demons, which is Mid-Game. Your entire argument hinges on PIS, and the fact that they do not go back in time to respect the past. That's literally the entire concept of Eternal Punishment, he chooses to remember the memories he was sworn to forget in the new universe.
you're not realThe burden of proof is on you. P2 does not have the same characters or events as P3-5.
Sorry, but I'm the real you. Now stop derailing.you're not real
I honestly mix the two up since all subsequent playthroughs I mash hard through the cutscenes like a speedrun, but I mean, my point still stands she was dying/in critical condition and no one could do anything.Accel probably got the bad ending where Nanako dies. Even in the other endings she was in bad condition.
Not by the wiki standards for the speed, better get to reworking it then.Let alone that there can be a myriad of in verse reasons to not time travel, or character reasons.
Let alone Immeasurable Speed does not mean you can time travel, and it works on a case by case basis.
Let alone that Persona/Megami Tensei works on multiverse theory.
This argument is done.
You're are quite possibly the most dishonest person I have ever met. Is there EVER any definitive difference in how one controls their Persona, in any series? Burden of proof for what? About the games I wasn't talking about, when this entire section is about P3-5? What the **** are you talking about?The burden of proof is on you. P2 does not have the same characters or events as P3-5.
I've already made it quite clear that I'm not going to let this cosmological gatekeeping slide. This was established in the first thread, in which you were on, why not mention anything then? No, Teddie did not revive Nanako. Do you remember the entire sequence where he RAN AWAY because he thought she was dead, and loses his purpose? The plot never intended her to die to begin with, so why would it matter?Well now you're just being rude. I sure as hell have played the games several times, P4G being my fav btw with P3 having my favorite persona story. You aren't helping your case here as a friendly debater.
Anyways, like, her monitor goes beeep and she's gone. She's brought back by Teddie somehow but I don't see how this means she didn't die or at least was pretty much at the bare edge of death. Again, a perilous situation that none of the P4 cast could solve because they can't bring out their persona's.
Eternal Punishment reiterates the same thing Persona 3: The Answer did.Who is getting Eternal Punishmented here? Why are you bring up that game and Tatsuya's stuff?
So why doesn't Goku incinerate everything within a 100km radius when he goes MFTL? Why doesn't Flash kill the people he's trying to save when he approaches "trans-time velocity"? Why doesn't infinite universes not work when there's a possibility in those infinite universes that nothing happens at all? Why does 2-A exist when there will just be another timeline where it's destruction doesn't happen? What you are arguing here is story 101.You just said they'd be so by mid-game, but that introduces a tone of holes. No one at that point cares about respecting anything mid-game, they just know how ****** they are from killing the Shadows and resurrecting Nyx.
I didn't mention anything then because my activity is sparse. I did have problems with it, but I wasn't really in a frame of mind to debate it.I've already made it quite clear that I'm not going to let this cosmological gatekeeping slide. This was established in the first thread, in which you were on, why not mention anything then? No, Teddie did not revive Nanako. Do you remember the entire sequence where he RAN AWAY because he thought she was dead, and loses his purpose? The plot never intended her to die to begin with, so why would it matter?
Which is irrelevant as they have immeasurable speed in Mid-game, which is pre-Answer and thus they have no reason to respect or even understand the concept.Eternal Punishment reiterates the same thing Persona 3: The Answer did.
And we gain feats from these stories and the things in them, as well as anti-feats. If enough anti-feats exist to question it, then it comes to reason to doubt whether they've really capable or not. And for the record, your examples there are on characters who have been shown and proven to perform feats like that to begin with, which...Persona does not have, at the very least, not P3-5. So it's not a fair comparison. What you're saying is akin to how an Orange tastes the same as an apple because it's round .So why doesn't Goku incinerate everything within a 100km radius when he goes MFTL? Why doesn't Flash kill the people he's trying to save when he approaches "trans-time velocity"? Why doesn't infinite universes not work when there's a possibility in those infinite universes that nothing happens at all? Why does 2-A exist when there will just be another timeline where it's destruction doesn't happen? What you are arguing here is story 101.
you were talking about eternal punishment...which is P2... you need proof that pre-answer p3, p4, and p5 characters wont **** with the pastYou're are quite possibly the most dishonest person I have ever met. Is there EVER any definitive difference in how one controls their Persona, in any series? Burden of proof for what? About the games I wasn't talking about, when this entire section is about P3-5? What the **** are you talking about?
because the story still works with those speeds and was built around them. That;s not the case with what I'm seeing for Persona.So why doesn't Goku incinerate everything within a 100km radius when he goes MFTL? Why doesn't Flash kill the people he's trying to save when he approaches "trans-time velocity"? Why doesn't infinite universes not work when there's a possibility in those infinite universes that nothing happens at all? Why does 2-A exist when there will just be another timeline where it's destruction doesn't happen? What you are arguing here is story 101.
I wouldn't mind, but I don't think I could participate in any threads anytime soon, got stuff coming up on my end. But when it's clear I could probably compile the anti-feats and reasoning on the persona speed (After SMT V-)Maybe it is better to postpone this argument until a later thread, as it seems to be derailing now?
I can do it. I actually already had a downgrade CRT for Persona in google docs, although that was to do for power instead of speed.I wouldn't mind, but I don't think I could participate in any threads anytime soon, got stuff coming up on my end. But when it's clear I could probably compile the anti-feats and reasoning on the persona speed (After SMT V-)
Very difficult dealing with some of the most rat & fraudulent arguments I’ve ever seen on this site back to back. I won’t respond for a couple of hours, the longer I’m here the more my teeth grind.Also, Milly, please try to calm down.
^I don't think that he is an intentional liar. He just has another take than you.
Personally I happen to think my arguments are very 'simple' and 'clean'.Very difficult dealing with some of the most rat & fraudulent arguments I’ve ever seen on this site back to back. I won’t respond for a couple of hours, the longer I’m here the more my teeth grind.
I meant that you can maybe create another thread about it after you have everything in order, but for the moment we should focus on getting the accepted revisions done.I wouldn't mind, but I don't think I could participate in any threads anytime soon, got stuff coming up on my end. But when it's clear I could probably compile the anti-feats and reasoning on the persona speed (After SMT V-)
Oh, it’s definitely rat. And I hate using that word. I try not to say anyone wanks or downplays, because everything is subjective, but when the game and narrative argue against it, then I absolutely know you’re dishonest.I don't think that he is an intentional liar. He just has another take than you.
However, I largely agree about you "story 101" argument.
Milly, I was initially siding with you, but now I have to side with Accel because your 'Story 101' doesn't make sense. At all.Oh, it’s definitely rat. And I hate using that word. I try not to say anyone wants or downplays, because everything is subjective, but when the game and narrative argue against it, then I absolutely know you’re dishonest.
Exactly.I think that you are likely being paranoid and overreacting. Also, we should try to be polite in this forum.
You're going to need to chill, people can look at a thing and perceive many alternative things. I respect the work you've done, but you need to stop insulting people so much, it doesn't go down well on this site, let alone anywhere (well... that's not exactly true I suppose).Oh, it’s definitely rat. And I hate using that word. I try not to say anyone wanks or downplays, because everything is subjective, but when the game and narrative argue against it, then I absolutely know you’re dishonest.
that's litterally arguing from incredubilityMilly, I was initially siding with you, but now I have to side with Accel because your 'Story 101' doesn't make sense. At all.
Why would ATLUS writers think of certain characters having Immeasurable speed...when the story they made does not work with them being that level? It's like top tier DBS only being super sonic- nobody would be able to get to other planets and thus Toriyama would have to fix the story.
Cough! Social media. Cough!it doesn't go down well on this site, let alone anywhere (well... that's not exactly true I suppose).
Damn dude it's just a debate.That’s fine. I won’t stop you from thinking that. I’ll return later, since I’m not the only one who agrees these arguments are rooted in bad faith.
If you could, that'd be good, but probably wait for the revisions first and for me to compile some anti-feats. Just DM me maybe in a week to check in on me and I'll see what I can do.I can do it. I actually already had a downgrade CRT for Persona in google docs, although that was to do for power instead of speed.