-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mcu 6-a and speed rough draft
- 17,295
- 27,107
The folly of live action superhero media scaling will always lie with studios taking the characters and feeling the need to downplay and degrade their power because the bigger scale stuff scares them and makes them believe that they'd be too strong to have any stakes or relatablity with audiences (plus it requires less effort to not make planet busting characters planet busters)
- 17,295
- 27,107
Apparently because it didn't happen on screen it's not usable even if it's from the head of the MCU saying Captain marvel could punch a moon away
The common calc for punching a moon out of orbit is high 6-A and my lazily thrown together calc here even using a smaller celestial body instead of our moon yields high 6-B and high 6-A results
Captain Marvel punches a moon
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #1,084
That’s very weird, it sounds like they tried to hand wave it tbhApparently because it didn't happen on screen it's not usable even if it's from the head of the MCU saying Captain marvel could punch a moon away
The common calc for punching a moon out of orbit is high 6-A and my lazily thrown together calc here even using a smaller celestial body instead of our moon yields high 6-B and high 6-A results
Captain Marvel punches a moon
- 17,295
- 27,107
This was the exact quote:
"With Captain Marvel, who has powers that approach a level that we haven’t seen before in our films, you need to counter-balance that by finding somebody who is also very human and very relatable and can get into a groove with the audience, where they’re willing to see her fly through the sun and punch a moon away from a spacecraft".
Also for some reason we're also binding captain marvel to Surtur's High 6-B destruction as a peak however even taking the lowest end of my calc Captain Marvel punching the moon away is High 6-B so it wouldn't even contradict the limit Surtur set and in fact look here
126.187 teratons of TNT (Destruction of Asguard)
127.9404756 Teratons of TNT (Lowest end for Captain Marvel Punching away a moon)
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #1,086
And this is why we should have put a counter for surtur’s death. Along with many other things
- 8,411
- 8,872
- 17,295
- 27,107
To be fair DCEU has even more solid anti-feats like Snydercut Supes being vaped by a surface wiping blast from the motherboxes a clear showing against those moon and Planetary arguements people try and make for it
- 8,411
- 8,872
Which doesn't count since the snyder cut ain't canon
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 17,295
- 27,107
Yeah but even then lets be real there's no planet level feats in the DCEU like people claim let alone star level like I've seen people wank to
- 8,411
- 8,872
Well maybe if it goes on even longer, eventually there will be.
- 17,295
- 27,107
This is facts I'm hoping so but hell even superman in superman and lois undid the merging of two universes with a single strike a sun dipping himself which is like beyond the entire DCEU currently(we don't scale him to this sadly I think we consider it just hax)
- 17,295
- 27,107
I'd have to look into but as I'm sure you're aware it's some pretty big and ergrigous wank
- 20,551
- 17,470
Tier 4 S&L or DCEU Superman? If someone meant in general there's ways to get like, Smallville Superman to Star Busting pretty easily.
If its high balling then it's probably CW Superman. I've seen people on ComicVine do some meme scaling with him and Supergirl before to try and say they're Star Busting or Universal before.
If its high balling then it's probably CW Superman. I've seen people on ComicVine do some meme scaling with him and Supergirl before to try and say they're Star Busting or Universal before.
- 4,643
- 5,436
- 20,551
- 17,470
That one was more along the lines of Cyclops' beams being rejected as SoL rather than them having a bunch of Relativistic feats.
- 17,295
- 27,107
DCEU Supes
You mean like with the doomsday planet stuff?
Now that's absolutely insane
- 4,643
- 5,436
Eh? Cyclops being SoL was accepted as far as I know since the scan literally says that his beams move at the speed of light, what was rejected was Relativistic combat speed since the characters can be hit by bullets or something like that
- 20,551
- 17,470
Nah. Just that if you go with the original size of Apokolips and Superman throwing it you'll get 4-C or High 4-C pretty easily because of how fast/big it was.
Since it's off topic for the thread, I'll try to stop after this comment. But from memory it was with the Black Hole stuff, scaling to the Anti-Monitor and some children's novel that no one read to push for universal.
- 20,551
- 17,470
Oh I never noticed.
But on your rework CRT I rejected it and the only person to argue for it being kept was KLOL who then dropped it. Cyclops was never meant to have kept the SoL rating, since it doesn't work with everyone reacting to it.
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #1,104
Kinda countered by the whole power growth thing
- 4,716
- 4,220
Where were all these people when we were arguing for the upgrades?
- 20,551
- 17,470
Scared off by my raw primal energy
- 4,716
- 4,220
Yea I guess ******* so.
Aight who wants to go through the movies in search of statements?
- 8,411
- 8,872
Weren't they not in there?
- 4,716
- 4,220
Idn it just seemed like it was me and Qwasedf going back and forth for quite a while
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #1,110
Not really, meaty was going at it with Q for awhile. I was also debating Q and fast for a bit. Then there was the whole WoG statement thing
- 17,295
- 27,107
Legit was lost for a good while in there ngl it went 2 pages in like 1 day
- 8,411
- 8,872
I see, I could've sworn I've seen more debates with Qaws at there
- 4,716
- 4,220
Don't take it to seriously im just salty
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #1,114
Also I just looked at carols profile but I find it funny how one of the justifications for her tier is a variant going agianst Wanda
- 20,551
- 17,470
Yeah that should be removed.
- 20,551
- 17,470
Okay, so I looked into it. It was added by user @Eseseso without a CRT and no one noticed the change. As such I'm removing the justification since it breaks the current scaling policy.
- 18,631
- 12,902
I apologize for that. It was meant as a minor support feat, before any of the recent upgrades
- 4,643
- 5,436
Speaking of Infinity Ultron, why does his profile says: "WoG states that Ultron is legitimately punching through universes across the multiverse and turning them into one messy universe soup" when the statement actually says "he's legit punching across multiverses turning them into one messy universe soup"? Both things sound different to me
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #1,120
Because people don’t want to accept the fact that he was destroying multiple multivreses
