Your question is irrelevant triviality meant to assert some tough guy cred against the staff, otherwise I genuinely see no point to pursue it. I choose not to answer it, it's got nothing to do with the thread. It's derailment.
Claims that Marvel has never once acknowledged inconsistencies in-canon when there are multiple runs where they very blatantly reference it if you think for more than 5 seconds. Claims that somehow this downplays the verse when we got High 1-B stuff off of shit as basic as Lee-Kirby era, for universes alone.
...what the absolute hell are you even talking about? You debunk your own claim that TOAA is variable by asserting he can take lower forms, and any form of his own choosing, implying he can shape cosmology to his whim. The "writer connection" is an assumption for indexing convenience, not something present in-verse, I acknowledged that already, if you can muster better ideas I'm up for hearing them, and Marvel Universe being a narrative is affirmed across multiple stories like No Road Home and the like, ehich is what becomes relevant towards TOAA's needs for shifting definitions. Them being the writers isn't a fraction as relevant to my revision as it is them being writer-like to begin with that matters, which is what you YOURSELF state.
Do I just let you debate yourself to a conclusion here, mate? Because the route you're going with the stuff you say, ends up just being things written in the OP.
Prove shit before claiming it. Your current argument is genuinely just, "No its not", with nothing added to it except taking even more points, and slapping "no its not" with little to no, or trivial elaboration, recognise my proposal is hinged on it being demonstratively true, which you haven’t given a single, properly worded argument against.
Actually a time waste to continue this discussion, there isn't a semblance of a point you've made, except "other sites think you're bad" and "this downplays marvel".
