oh god, here you go again with your conspiracy theories. You gonna pull the “tire the staff” card Again? Stop with the ad hominems, you’re more aggre then everyone here.
Theres only one staff here and he agrees with low 2-C.
Him surviving the epicenter of the Explosion/Black Hole, and him not being instantly incinerated, but just stunned by Low 2-C heat. Those are two Low 2-C feats in base.
wasn't epicenter and there's no evidence that he was hit. IT just says that he narrowly escaped same as the rest of the cast. To say that he was universal because he survived a blast that recreated the universe would imply everything in the marioverse is Low 2-C.
this shows the universe being destroyed, Rosalina saving Mario and Peach, and then the universe is recreated and they're back on the Mushroom Kingdom. Unless you think Bowser's durability is infinitely higher than Mario it does not make sense for him to have "tanked" it.
Bowser is usually>>>Mario in durability
Which Bowser was there and survived, case and point. Nothing exactly pin points Mario would've died from it, I mean Bowser didn't so naturally Mario shouldn't. If anything, Rosalina did so because she was teaching Mario about the universe. Yet again, please provide proof of your previous claims, do not just suddenly shift the argument.
False equivalence, difference between being there when the big bang happened and exists/created because the big bang happened
Ah yes, I must have forgotten about my basic biology lesson on
Okay that made me laugh lol
They would both have Low 2-C durability, with Bowser having higher durability than Mario.
This is ridiculous. Mario would have died from the "Low 2-C" explosion so he doesn't have Low 2-C durability even by this same premise.
The burden of proof is on you bud
Prove it.
It is proven in the argument. If Mario can be killed by Low 2-C and needed Rosalina to shield him from it even if he wasn't in the epicenter of the blast he's not Low 2-C in durability.
I mean, even if you're tier 2 you would rather not be hit by something, so just because he was shielded isn't automatically an anti feat in terms of context to begin with.
The Prima Guide says that Mario and Peach would have died had Rosalina not shielded them from the universe-ending blast.
Where though? All it says is that Rosalina shielded them from the blast. Also, downscaling exists.
Where? It just says Mario and Peach escaped the destruction of the fabric of the universe from being shielded. Where did it state Mario would've been killed?
Pretty sure Bowser was at the epicentre... Rechecking the cutscene, the celestial body he's on that becomes the supernova/supermassive blackhole is a 1:1 to what he was standing on a few frames before...
Not at all, no one is name calling.
Well Alright if you say so, just seems this Topic has a very odd overwhelming air to it here
Fair enough.
I don't think so
