- 15,828
- 8,835
Furthermore, scans are already doing a valid job. With references, you either propose one of 2 things. The complete eradication of scans, or a mix of both scans and references. Eradicating scans is a hassle would just encourage users to bullshit statistics that would be harder for for people to source because they would have to go through the effort of actually hunting down said source. Mixing would be redundant because the scans already do the work.
Again, I'm all for references. I just don't think they should be mandatory.
Again, I'm all for references. I just don't think they should be mandatory.