Make Arnos Great Again (MAGA): Hypertimeline

[Fixxed]

Seems like just different time flow rate, which per the FAQ is not nearly enough for hyper timelines. Otherwise, our own universe would have so many time axes due to black holes and time dilation inside them.

I'm outside home right now, so will make a more elaborative comment later when am back, in a few minutes to at best some hours.

If it was finite yes. Infinite amount of time cannot be considered as just different different flow of time, as oppose we consider it as one whole timeline. The standard clearly stated this

No...
This is basically the same as saying that a line segment in terms of a number of points it has is equivalent to uncountable infinity... Which is utterly wrong by the way.

Bruh i think you must search before you reply or just ask chatgpt, the set of real numbers was uncountable by default
Cantor prove this by binary digit (0 and 1)

• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor's_diagonal_argument
• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_the_continuum

And this what chatgpt say

The set of all decimals between 0 and 1 has the cardinality of the continuum, denoted by 𝑐, which is the same as the cardinality of the real numbers.

To understand this, consider that any decimal between 0 and 1 can be written as an infinite decimal expansion. For example, the number
0.𝑎1𝑎2𝑎3..., where 𝑎𝑖 is a digit in the set {0,1,2,.…,9}, can be mapped to a sequence of digits, and there are infinitely many such sequences. This set is uncountably infinite, meaning it has a cardinality larger than that of the set of natural numbers (which is countably infinite).

Thus, the cardinality of the set of decimals between 0 and 1 is the same as the cardinality of the real numbers, 𝑐, which is 2^ℵ0 , where ℵ0 represents the cardinality of the natural numbers.

 

[BestMGQScalerEver]

And this what chatgpt say

unfathomably mid. i think i'll disagree for this alone

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

considered as just different different flow of time, as oppose we consider it as one whole timeline. The standard clearly stated this

Not really. Mind quoting a part of the standards that say an infinite time achieved by time acceleration is equivalent to Low 2-C?

Because by the same logic, they means every snapshot of the "World" has to be of the same length, which presents several problems:

• Beings with clearly finite lifespan are clearly shown to live more than just an "instance".
• Anos himself should have been able to live for more than an instance, at all, yet we can see they as the accelerated time on his body returned to normal, nothing more happened to it.

Therefore, due to several anti feats, it's not a full on hyper timeline. After all, for a hyper timeline, each and every single snapshot IS equal to a 4D eternity, it's not a "they can be" but rather "they are" each equivalent of that, yet I see no such thing here.

Bruh i think you must search before you reply or just ask chatgpt, the set of real numbers was uncountable by default
Cantor prove this by binary digit (0 and 1)

• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor's_diagonal_argument
• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality_of_the_continuum

And this what chatgpt say

Hmm, interesting. It seems my analogy was wrong for this case. My bad, in that case. I also went ahead and confirmed it by a human source, and it seems it's true.

In any case, my overall assessment of the in-verse case remains the same.

 

[Ottavio_Merluzzo]

unfathomably mid. i think i'll disagree for this alone

I concur with this. Like... ChatGPT ???

 

[Fixxed]

Not really. Mind quoting a part of the standards that say an infinite time achieved by time acceleration is equivalent to Low 2-C?

This

In those cases, the destruction of any one timeline is only counted if it was not connected to any other timeline for an infinite amount of time. Otherwise, if there are several timelines none of which are separate for an infinite amount of time, they would all be counted as just one timeline for the purpose of tiering their destruction or creation.
Note that timelines, by default, are assumed to be infinitely long i.e. it’s assumed that there is no end to time.

Because by the same logic, they means every snapshot of the "World" has to be of the same length, which presents several problems:

• Beings with clearly finite lifespan are clearly shown to live more than just an "instance".
• Anos himself should have been able to live for more than an instance, at all, yet we can see they as the accelerated time on his body returned to normal, nothing more happened to it.

Therefore, due to several anti feats, it's not a full on hyper timeline. After all, for a hyper timeline, each and every single snapshot IS equal to a 4D eternity, it's not a "they can be" but rather "they are" each equivalent of that, yet I see no such thing here.

The nature of every frame in timeline is same basically there are no bigger and smaller frame, If one frame can contain infinite amount of time the other frame can

Also the keeper literally have ability to accelerate the time to infinity in his own domain/world in a single instant. He can use this anytime he want inside his domain. So it correct to say every frame can contain the eternity of time. He can basically doing that again and again. Soo yes every frame can contain eternity of time

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

This

This is aII taIking about timeIines, separate space-times, not some time acceIeration stuff -_-

The nature of every frame in timeline is same basically there are no bigger and smaller frame, If one frame can contain infinite amount of time the other frame can

That is for timeIines, different causaIIy isoIated space-time continuities, not time acceIeration, once again.

Also the keeper literally have ability to accelerate the time to infinity in his own domain/world in a single instant. He can use this anytime he want inside his domain. So it correct to say every frame can contain the eternity of time. He can basically doing that again and again. Soo yes every frame can contain eternity of time

But aII of those frames are not of that eternaI Iength aII the time, the time keeper has to manuaIIy do it. So again, that is a can be case, not a they are case.

RegardIess, it seems the base of your argument is that the time acceIerated stuff is treated as a different timeIine, which is just wrong.

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

unfathomably mid. i think i'll disagree for this alone

PersonaIIy, same, but eh, I went ahead out of curiosity and found a human source saying simiIar stuff on a math site.

 

[AwkguyDB]

disagree fra

 

[Wikisource]

Ig I'm neutral now, this seems vague...

 

[Robo432343]

huh shouldn't the verse be Low 1-C anyway because of chapter 425 stuff

"Each sanctuary is a microcosm of the world. Just as the upper limit of the root of the world is fixed, the number of fire dewdrops in da ku kadate is fixed, as is the number of flowers in this sanctuary."