- 624
- 475
Doesn't make any much difference tbf"I'm talking about stage hazards, mostly"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't make any much difference tbf"I'm talking about stage hazards, mostly"
If you argument is that they were attacks coming from a 4-A person, when they aren't, yes it does.Doesn't make any much difference tbf
Game mechanics,and even then,they mainly effects the karts not the racersIf you argument is that they were attacks coming from a 4-A person, when they aren't, yes it does.
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, so you're against any form of low 2-C Mario including the varies compromise?How is it derailing to disagree with an upgrade?
I am fine with a varies. I agree that Mario reaches Low 2-C (or higher) at his peak, I just don't think it's his usual power level.Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, so you're against any form of low 2-C Mario including the varies compromise?
And yes (I'm tired I've keep having to say this) using explicit game mechanics is indeed a derail, since its not an argument.
Definitely disagree with a varies tier based on Mario getting hurt by spikes and wooden barrels n shit. Every video game character has Tier 9 anti-feats during gameplay,unless there's a game where the character just bulldozes through the levels and isn't affected by stage hazards.
The topic is low 2-C. The downgrade side is derailing using game mechanics.I don't think we'll achieve anything out of this mess. This thread should be closed and one with only 1 topic being talked about should be made, like most bosses in the Galaxy games not scaling to their power source, we can deal with that, then have no one brings it up again and we then move on to other topic. That would be organized. A Varies up to Low 2-C is no going to happen out of dishonest tactics, it's not a natural conclusion, just people asking what they want to see.
There's way more arguments than that. I'm just using this to argue that his peak is also below 4-A. Don't try and use this to illegitimize other arguments.The topic is low 2-C. The downgrade side is derailing using game mechanics.
Exactly. Scrutinized. Black Jewel for example would have zero issue if it were some light or visual novel.As much as I'd like to see a Tier 2 Mario I'm not sure if a "Varies, up to Low 2-C" can work at this point considering every Low 2-C feat was scrutinized to death and the majority of staff here disagree with them.
Ok. Lemme get it straight. Staff has no reason to have more weight on the decision. They regulate the conversation.As much as I'd like to see a Tier 2 Mario I'm not sure if a "Varies, up to Low 2-C" can work at this point considering every Low 2-C feat was scrutinized to death and the majority of staff here disagree with them.
Agreed, but mostly in the sense of calling out everyone.You don't need a good argument to accept something as truth, nor do you need to prove it. This is a problem with this thread, everybody on Matts side who agrees gets blamed for not having a reason while people who said accepted it on Weebs side don't get called out. You call out everybody or you call out nobody, just don't give them shit for not contributing much.
Exactly. Scrutinized. Black Jewel for example would have zero issue if it were some light or visual novel.
There was also...There's way more arguments than that. I'm just using this to argue that his peak is also below 4-A. Don't try and use this to illegitimize other arguments.
I'm glad you have decided these are the rules now.Ok. Lemme get it straight. Staff has no reason to have more weight on the decision. They regulate the conversation.
That’s the point, StarI don't thing having surface area for 2-C as an argument is a truth
Ant himself already pointed out that "regulating the conversation" isn't the ONLY purpose of the staff...Ok. Lemme get it straight. Staff has no reason to have more weight on the decision. They regulate the conversation.
This ain't a rule. This is a logical fact. Staff are to regulate the discussion. Case closed.I'm glad you have decided these are the rules now.
Yeah right, to make judgements. They probably aren't biased, but this doesn't suddenly lift their arguments.
My respect for trying, mateYou know what, I was trying to come up with a potential solution for both sides, but it seems like that isn't gonna happen. So I give up, gl on the thread.
Complaining about the unfair staff in every single post is a non-essential activity. I will ask you to stop.Yeah right, to make judgements. They probably aren't biased, but this doesn't suddenly lift their arguments.
Whatever helps you sleep at nightThis ain't a rule. This is a logical fact. Staff are to regulate the discussion. Case closed.
I'm saying you're unfair. I'm saying we shouldn't just count the amount of staff agreeing and nothing else.Complaining about the unfair staff in every single post is a non-essential activity. I will ask you to stop.
Eeeeem.... What?Whatever helps you sleep at night
If it’s such a problem then you should’ve stopped me from saying things like that five years ago when that was the crux of my arguments. Also...prove me wrong then.Cal, make an argument that doesn't involve pointing at the neighbor's grass challenge. All you're doing is complaining that other series have higher ratings.
Neither of those are arguments. Like, they're not even bad arguments, they're just notIf it’s such a problem then you should’ve stopped me from saying things like that five years ago when that was the crux of my arguments. Also...prove me wrong then.
Tbh I don't blame you, I've tried being reasonable and kept the middle ground as well as reminding folks to not bring up other verses into this debacle not to mention pointing out the clear hypocrisy but this ad nauseam status quo for any popular verse's major CRT is just ridiculous!You know what, I was trying to come up with a potential solution for both sides, but it seems like that isn't gonna happen. So I give up, gl on the thread.
You realize not every post I make is an argument, right?Neither of those are arguments. Like, they're not even bad arguments, they're just not
Fair enough.You realize not every post I make is an argument, right?
Yeah and his black jewel argument was hilariously awful, so only 1.Actually, when has Matthew disproven all of the Low 2-C feats? I am checking this thread and it looks like he only really disproved 1-2 if we cut him some slack.