• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Low 2-C Mario: In The Final

Status
Not open for further replies.
if you do it with magic energy it isn't?
black jewel has to sustain that level of energy to keep it from collapsing so i think it applies, plus https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/The_Sun_(OneShot) is low 2-C dura from sustaining the universe
Just a question, what's the point of Rosalina shielding Mario and Peach if, at the ending of the scaling chain, they are as durable as her anyway?
would be an outlier if mario got low 2-C
He doesn't he has no power ups.
he does in SM3DW from bowser fighting rosa.

edit: typo
 
the only thing which rosa's ap would apply to is the minor bosses which would be too big of outliers i think.
 
DUDE. Use your brain man, plenty of characters, Mario and Sonic included have these types of things, yet all of their feats aren’t considered outliers.
This isn't an argument.

My point exactly that Rosalina being harmed by Bowser is game mechanics. You can't use this as evidence that Bowser scales to her therefore Mario scales to her when:

1. Rosalina lacks a single solid durability feat.

2. Mario and Peach were gonna die from something Rosalina casually shielded them from.

To do otherwise makes the ending of Galaxy illogical and "Cast got stronger" is a headcanon not reflected in the text.
 
Btw I don't mind either way if this CRT gets accepted or not so I guess that makes me neutral? (not that my opinion matters in the long run).

But I will say, folks should try everything possible to keep the arguments concise and on topic while trying to be as "objective" as possible, I know it can be easy to let emotions flair when a popular verse gets major upgrades or downgrades but bias aside lets keep it clean shall we?

I swear if this thread breaks the 1000 message mark, I'm going to commit spaghetti!
 
No. This is a classic Watsonian vs Doylist problem.

The more logical solution is that Rosalina being harmed in 3D World is there to make playing as her fun and challenging.
I really can’t tell you why rosalina thought it was necessary to protect peach and Mario, other than 2 options.

1. She protected them like she would any living being, even if it wasn’t nessesary
2. The game devs wanted to tell a story, and wanted rosalina to be stronger then Mari, without taking into account the ways that other games feats may be taken, and never expected us to use the characters and feats literally.
 
Now that I got a bunch of other stuff out of the way hopefully; though worried they might all come back by the time I finish. I'm going to write up an uber lengthy post to address the OP for and against bit by bit.
 
2. The game devs wanted to tell a story, and wanted rosalina to be stronger then Mari, without taking into account the ways that other games feats may be taken, and never expected us to use the characters and feats literally.
Option 2 is most likely correct imo, consistent with Miyamoto's more carefree approach to Mario
 
1. She protected them like she would any living being, even if it wasn’t nessesary
2. The game devs wanted to tell a story, and wanted rosalina to be stronger then Mari, without taking into account the ways that other games feats may be taken, and never expected us to use the characters and feats literally.
1. That's not what it's stated at all, it's stated they would have died otherwise.

2. teh game devs don't expet anyone to take ANY feat because they're not thinking about it. Get the Vs Debate mentality of your head and imagine being a game dev who doesn't care about anyone's power level. Rosalina is going to be damaged by everything from Goombas to Bowser because she's a character in a game.
 
Out of all the low 2-C feats/statements Blaze (excellent name btw) submitted, which ones are unanimously/mostly accepted as legit?
 
1. That's not what it's stated at all, it's stated they would have died otherwise.

2. teh game devs don't expet anyone to take ANY feat because they're not thinking about it. Get the Vs Debate mentality of your head and imagine being a game dev who doesn't care about anyone's power level. Rosalina is going to be damaged by everything from Goombas to Bowser because she's a character in a game.
1. Ok I apologize
2. How is this relevant to what I just said, I was referring to smg. That is literally exactly what I said.

2b. I will say this again, the game devs never meant for us to take any of these as feats. They never ment for us to take all of these potential feats. The ending of smg is just pis. That’s all it is by our standards.
 
They fought here. Dimentio said it was just an amusement, yet he was still clearly shaken from the fight
 
No. We are not scaling anyone into Low 2-C. Honestly, scaling anybody to low 2-C is not only off putting but pretty much goes against the consistency and coherence to begin with. Not to mention it also means scaling everyone else and I speak for everyone when I say low 2-C Toad is ridiculous. I really don't know why we keep getting this repeated vouch topic.
 
Last edited:
No. We are not scaling anyone into Low 2-C. Honestly, scaling anybody to low 2-C not only is off putting but pretty much goes against the consistency. Not to mention it also means scaling everyone else and I speak for everyone when I say low 2-C Toad is ridiculous.
Arguments please.
 
Should probably clarify that Dimentio D strengthened/amped the protagonists...

Also, this.
Screenshot_82.png
 
No. We are not scaling anyone into Low 2-C. Honestly, scaling anybody to low 2-C not only is off putting but pretty much goes against the consistency and coherence to begin with. Not to mention it also means scaling everyone else and I speak for everyone when I say low 2-C Toad is ridiculous. I really don't know why we keep getting this repeated topic.
All of the Staff besides Cal rejected it as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top