- 61,177
- 14,747
Jhin literally says that he can destroy the entire universe instantly but just chooses not to
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its almost like the Dark Star itself scales above the Dark Star CorruptantsMonarch Laciel said:- The Dark Star God, a living black hole which is capable of destroying universes, does not scale to the Corruptants. It is their god, them being weaker than it is inane.
Fun fact.Rocker1189 said:The dark Star itself would consume everything. Thresh himself consumed they void which is what he scales to. You clearly did not understand the scaling.
Attempting to do bigger things when your direct rivals (those being the Cosmics) still exist is downright stupid.
The void as it currently is is 5-D and was directly consumed by thresh. And the others scale to him. That is a direct feat he did. In fact thresh sees the void as a worse version of the Dark Stars. The void is at least 2-A even ignoring the Low 1-C showings. This would make the Dark Stars at least 2-A.LSirLancelotDuLacl said:And what are they based on? I've been skimming the arguments and counters a couple of times because I wanted to get my mind off something else and not seeing much else.
Not only is the 5-D stuff being contested for the void, if not outright feeling rather insufficient when I read it, there seems to be far more consistent feats in a certain range from people that "should scale", putting that in contention.
Used the wrong word, should have been equalRegisNex1232 said:A little confused here. Do you mean that the DS God is weaker/stronger than the Corruptants, or just that the DS God has its own feat and doesn't scale to the Corruptants and vice versa?Monarch Laciel said:- The Dark Star God, a living black hole which is capable of destroying universes, does not scale to the Corruptants. It is their god, them being weaker than it is inane.
No, he says "everything".WeeklyBattles said:Jhin literally says that he can destroy the entire universe instantly but just chooses not to
Them feeding it to the Dark Star in accordance with their usual modus operandi does though.WeeklyBattles said:>Uses plural, not singular. He's talking about all the corruptants doing it together (likely with the Dark Star God because that's their modus operandi), not just himself.
A bunch of characters destroying a 5-D realm doesnt discredit them destroying it. Hell a bunch of characters destroying an infinitely 3-D realm doesnt discredit it.
Are literally any of those different statements beyond the ones where an obvious timeframe isn't given and makes it sound like a gradual process?WeeklyBattles said:Yes im chosing that becaus he has multiple other statemets of being able to destroy the universe to back up the interpretation that he i saying he could destroy the universe.
Yes you can rule over people far stronger than you. Did you not read Marvel/DC comics, or BNHA? It happens all the time. Having control over a stronger character than yourself (through whatever means) isn't something impossible.Rocker1189 said:Also on the note if the Dark Star being above everyone else, you do know that they literally have the power to control it right? Dark Star Liz literally wants to rule the Dark Star itself. There is no way you can rule over something far more powerful than you. It is an entity not a place.
And you haven't provided anything like this to show the statements above are obviously not as consistent whyyyyyyyyy?WeeklyBattles said:Honestly lowballing it to tier 4 or even 3-C is horribly inaccurate given that w have statements like Jhin saying that destroying a galaxy is a trivial matter and Lux saying she can destroy galaxies with a thought
The Dark Star =/= The Dark Stars Champions/Cosmic Court Champions. It would be nice if you could stop making such ridiculous arguments and post what you claim is self-explanatory evidence.WeeklyBattles said:@Regis Glad you agree because the Devs said that the Dark Star is stronger than the Dawnbringer and Nightbringers which are Low 2-C
He doesn't say it's "trivial". He says it is pedestrian and derivative. These are words that art critics use to describe bad art. Not words that indicate it is something super easy for him.WeeklyBattles said:Honestly lowballing it to tier 4 or even 3-C is horribly inaccurate given that w have statements like Jhin saying that destroying a galaxy is a trivial matter and Lux saying she can destroy galaxies with a thought
What you just said is the absolute definition of a no limits fallacy. You are seriously trying to argue that just because the lore doesn't say destroying galaxies are their limits, we should assume they can therefore destroy the multiverse.Planck69 said:None of those statements cited by Monarch even remotely hint that that's the extent of their power.
I will keep saying this.Rocker1189 said:Except he is right most feats on this wiki that are high end do not have a given timeframe or are over time.